Posted By woodturner2 on 04/21/2009 7:00 PM
I live in cold climate upper Michigan,plan on useing owens corning foam sheathing,the attic has no floor just fiberglass insulation on top of drywall,house just has crawlspace not insulated inside. The furnace cold air return is in the attic under 16 inches of fiberglass insulation.
Spraying 4" of half-pound foam or 2.5-3" of 2lb foam to the underside of the roof deck between the rafters to insulate and seal the soffit/ridge vents is probably the right thing to do. Unless you have an extremely tight attic floor (spray-foam seal under that fiberglass) and mastic-sealed ultra-tight ducts a significant amount of conditioned air is ending up in the attic only to condense/frost on the wood or in the fiberglass before exiting out the attic vents. By sealing and insulating the attic you will be eliminating that air migration out of the house and slowing (but not eliminating) the communication between the conditioned space & attic, reducing condensation potential in the attic somewhat. (It might still need a de-humidifier up there- depends. Monitor the relative humidity to be sure.)
Owens Corning makes a variety of XPS foam sheathing- go with the one with the highest permeabilty (Foamular ? which is still pretty low), but definitiely NOT the low-perm ProPink, and don't use any low-permeability sheeting or sheathing over that so that at least SOME outward drying can occur.
At R5 per inch you're looking at a true R15 clear-wall value on the outside of ~R7-R9 studwall. The average winter humidity & temperature profile through the wall probably puts the dew-point inside the foam, and keeps the studs in the dry zone, which is good. Be sure to use low permeability interior finishes to allow the wall to dry inward though. (No foil or vinyl wallpapers or low-permebility paints.)
An alternative would be to use 3" fiber-faced isocynaurate insulation (often sold as roofing insulation for flat or low-slope roofs) for the walls above the foundation (still use XPS on the foundation though), held in place with a high-permeability sheathing like Stedi-R. In that case the wall structure would be fully outward-drying (good, in cold climates), and would add about R21-23 to the existing structure for about the same cost & thickness as going with XPS sheathing. Then using vapor-retardent interior paints or wallpapers would be a GOOD thing, especially if combined with good caulking/air-sealing around all kick-boards, plumbing & electrical penetrations, crown moldings, etc to keep room air out of the wall cavities.
By sealing up the upper house & foundation with foam paneling from the outside crawlspace vapor pressures become an issue. Be sure to block any crawlspace vents, use concrete-sealer on the interior walls, and put a 6-10-mil full-span poly vapor-retarder on the floor, sealed to the concrete at least a foot above the dirt with mastic, mechanically held to the wall with furring strips. Any seams/splits on between sheets of poly need a 1' overlap, sealed with mastic. Insulating the floor with 2" of XPS foam might be your next insulating step too.
http://www.fpl.fs.fed.us/documnts/techline/crawl-space-ventilation.pdf
Foam sheathing plus converting to unvented attic/crawspace may tighten up the place to the point where you'll need/want active ventilation with either a heat-recovery ventilation (HRV) system, or a small bathroom exhaust vent running off a timer, humidistat, or occupancy sensor etc. In a tight house you also have to be mindful of potential backdrafting/combustion air supply problems for the furnace when it's running, particularly when you have kitchen/bath exhaust ventilation & clothes-dryers running. (Carbon monoxide detectors are must anyway, tight house or not- get them if you don't have them!) If possible, convert the furnace to run "sealed combustion", drawing it's combustion air from outdoors. (Woodburning appliances, same story.) Also, consider that by tripling the clear-wall value of your walls (20-fold on the foundation!) your heat loss will probably be cut by more than half, and the furnace is now oversized for the load (which it might already be in the first place), which means it won't run anywhere near it's rated efficiency. Do a careful heat-loss calculation (Manual-J or similar) and if the existing unit turns out to be 400%+ oversized (which is surprisingly typical) a "right sized" replacement is probably cost-effective.