Heat load and HRV efficiency
Last Post 14 Aug 2009 05:04 PM by hgoed. 3 Replies.
Printer Friendly
Sort:
PrevPrev NextNext
You are not authorized to post a reply.
Author Messages
hgoedUser is Offline
New Member
New Member
Send Private Message
Posts:10

--
24 Jul 2009 02:04 PM

Does anybody have a formula or suggestions for calculating the heat load of forced ventilation through an HRV?  Specifically, I'd like to figure out the practical difference (as far as load on my heating system) between using a standard HRV with about 74% sensible effectiveness vs. upgrading to a dual core HRV with about 95% sensible effectiveness, given the same air flow.

Thanks.

Jesse ThompsonUser is Offline
New Member
New Member
Send Private Message
Posts:81

--
24 Jul 2009 04:18 PM
PHPP (the Passivehouse design software) has this capacity.

If you are in the US, there is a list of local PH consultants here: http://passivehouse.us/passiveHouse/PHIUSHome.html
Jesse Thompson
Kaplan Thompson Architects
http://www.kaplanthompson.com/
Portland, ME

Beautiful, Sustainable, Attainable
VentolatorUser is Offline
New Member
New Member
Send Private Message
Posts:9

--
13 Aug 2009 04:19 PM

Before changing units, compare apples to apples using HVI certification, qualify airflows and electrical use.  Many air exchangers test their units at the lowest possible airflows to come up with big numbers that are not practical, or at the airflow you will be using.  Unless units are independently HVI certified, the numbers are unsubstantiated.  Qualify same efficiency number descriptions by HVI.  There are two numbers given on this report; Sensible Recovery Efficiency and Apparent Sensible Effectiveness (usually @ 10 points higher), and these will be qualified by airflow, for example 74% Sensible Recovery Efficiency @ 120 cfm.  The unit you may be looking to buy could be 95% Apparent Sensible Effectiveness @ 64cfm.  They might actually be rated closer than you think.  Look at watts per cfm. and Total Recovery Efficiency (@95F, a summer number).  You may be spending a lot of money for very low return or even a loss.

hgoedUser is Offline
New Member
New Member
Send Private Message
Posts:10

--
14 Aug 2009 05:04 PM
I found in some literature put out by Bryant a comparison of their various units and their effect on heating and cooling load. The difference between their high efficiency 190cfm model, HRVBBLVU1200, which is the same as the Venmar and VanEE units and has an EFFICIENCY of 84% (I think that number should take into account the fan motor) vs. their regular 190cfm model which has an efficiency of 64% averages about 2500btu/hr for the heating season. I'm assuming that is btu/hr that the air is being exchanged, but I'm not sure. I have yet to calculate how this would translate into energy used and $$.
You are not authorized to post a reply.

Active Forums 4.1
Membership Membership: Latest New User Latest: jtraut New Today New Today: 9 New Yesterday New Yesterday: 10 User Count Overall: 17374
People Online People Online: Visitors Visitors: 568 Members Members: 55 Total Total: 623

GreenBuildingTalk

Welcome to GreenBuildingTalk, the largest, most active forum on green building. While you can browse the site as a guest, you need to register in order to post.

Register Member Login Forum Home

Search Directory

Professionals Products

Get Free Quotes

Tell us about your building project and get free quotes from green building professionals. It's fast & easy! Click here to get your free quote.

Site Sponsors

For Advertising Info:
Call 866-316-5300 or 312-223-1600

Professionals Serving Your Area:

Copyright 2010 by BuildCentral, Inc.   Terms Of Use  Privacy Statement  Free Quotes  Professional Directory  Advertising Programs