Posted By missmoo on 22 Apr 2013 02:17 PM
Thanks for all the responses. I guess this is complicated because we are trying to insulate a sound room. Thus all the materials are serving 2 purposes.
1. The outer wall is the foundation wall and we need to insulate that. We can't add another wall inside of that - thus having 3 walls along that side - because that would make a triple leaf for the sound waves. As a result, the room would actually be less sound proof with three walls than 2 walls.
2. We are using extruded polystyrene because of its density. We need this for the soundproofing.
3. We aren't doing the french drains at the interior. We worked to resolve the water at the exterior of the foundation, and then also painted the interior of the foundation wall with Ardex.
4. In order to achieve the soundproofing, we are using double stud wall construction with a 1" air gap in between. If all goes ok, it will be totally sealed for air...The wall assembly is as follows: exterior foundation wall, 2X2 stud wall within which we will put the extruded polystyrene R-10, 1" air gap and then a 2X4 wood stud wall with batt insulation, then the vapor barrier and then the 2 layers of drywall. The rim joists are insulated with a layer of drywall and then a layer of rigid polystyrene.
Given the assembly I am describing and using these materials should I not use a vapor barrier at all? Should I put it on the warm side of the inner stud wall?
Most XPS sheathing sold in box stores is 1.5lbs nominal density, just like foil faced polyiso.
In MA there are several sources for reclaimed 2lb & 3lb roofing iso too. (Insulationdepot.com being just one of a handful. Search the local craigslist for "rigid insulation", you'll find some of the others.)
Air tightness counts more than foam density for STC points on rigid walls. It would seem that the rigidity & density of the foundation itself may render the acoustic properties of the foam moot anyway, but if you're looking for higher density foam, look at 3lb roofing iso (2x the density of box-store XPS.)
Do NOT put 2x2s against the foundation with foam in-between. The low-R of the wood dramatically lowers the thermal performance and the wood wicks ground moisture from the concrete. Instead use 1x furring
over the foam, through-screwed to the foundation 24" o.c. with TapCons. Even if you have to back off on foam thickness it'll end up being higher-R than with the thermal bridging of the 2x2s, and the moisture performance would be an order of magnitude better without the wicking.
Do NOT use an interior side vapor barrier, as that will trap ground moisture inside the stud cavities, creating a mold condition. With even an inch of foam on the exterior the wood stays warm enough to avoid excessive wintertime moisture.
The notion that you need a vapor barrier in this climate is a false presumption. The need for an interior side permeance lower than that of standard latex paint (2-5 perms) can be completely avoided with as little as an inch of exterior-side foam, and you are discussing using 1.5-2" of foam, which provides a HUGE margin.
Without any air barrier against the fiber insulation on the batts it's thermal performance is degraded by convective currents in to and out of the fiber from your 1" air gap. (I'd think a rigid exterior-side air barrier on the studs would also lower the sound transmission too.)