Posted By easyrider470 on 16 Apr 2014 08:36 PM
Well since I got the foam for free, and it's once used foam off a roof I felt it was the logical, gree. and economical choice to make. Don't think anyone can argue with me there.
Secondly like badger says I am not nearly as concerned with what is on top of the. Spot barrier as much as I am what is below it getting I to the house
Now, back to my actual question. Is the support under the foam a huge deal or will the concrete hold it down and level it pretty well. Do I need to worry about the fronts footer area???
When using reclaimed XPS you are extending the lifecycle of material that is already manufactured, which has far less environmental hit than using any virgin-stock.
I've never seen the issues involved with finish floor damage first hand, but have more than one second-party reference to the issue. Joe Lstiburek of the Building Science Corp thinks it's enough of a risk that it's worth swapping the layering in the stack, placing the poly above the foam rather than below.
Type-II EPS (~1.5lb nominal density) is easy to source from multiple vendors, and is almost universally cheaper than XPS. I suspect Morgan's source problems are for Type-IX foam (2lbs nominal density), preferred by those radiant slab builders who staple the tubing directly to the foam for it's superior staple-retention. Pricing on Type-IX EPS has always been lower than XPS in my (albeit limited) experience, but I could believe there would be markets/situations where you'd pay a premium for Type-IX EPS over 1.5lb XPS.
Raking the gravel layer reasonably smooth (even compacting it) prior to laying down the foam is good practice. Don't count on the weight of 3-4" of concrete to flex 3" XPS to any sharp or deep anomalies.