|
|
|
Foam over SIPs as strategy versus cantilevered SIP
Last Post 08 Mar 2010 09:21 AM by altovintner. 7 Replies.
|
Sort:
|
|
Prev Next |
You are not authorized to post a reply. |
|
altovintner
 New Member
 Posts:33
 |
| 03 Mar 2010 10:49 AM |
|
Hello Everyone. I have searched these forums and read about cantilevered SIPs and the recent thread about foam on SIPs. I should like to get your opinions as to a potential strategy I am thinking about.
Background: We are in S. Central New Mexico, 7100 ft. altitude, 5500 - 6000 HDD. We have extremely high winds and sunshine percents as high as anywhere in the US. House plan for some 2 years from now: 2300-2400 sq. ft., single story, L-shape, 5/12 hip metal roof, 6 to 7% South facing high SHGC windows for passive solar gains. Additionally we plan to have an insulated monolithic slab, 2" XPS both under and on perimeter. Walls using 4 1/2" Poly SIPs for R28; roof using 6 1/2" poly SIPs for R40. Stucco. General goal is to attain some of the features of PassivHaus, but not all. Sort of a "PassivHaus wannabe."
I have recently purchased Joseph Lstiburek's book "Structural Insulated Panels" and am attempting to memorize it as we speak. On page 169, there is a drawing of a Monolithic Slab --- SIP Above Grade Wall. Well, that drawing shows the sill plate and sip cantilevered by what appears to be 2", along with rigid foam on the perimeter of the exposed concrete slab. In other words the distance that the SIP wall assembly is moved out from the foundation perimeter wall equals the width of the foam insulation on slab perimeter. To me, if I use 4 1/2" SIPs the notion of cantilevering just does not seem to make sense. Hence, I am toying with an idea to have the insulated slab --- both perimeter and underslab --- and avoid the cantilevering. The idea: Insulate the monolithic slab with 2" XPS, including the perimeter. But, also add 2" XPS over the 4 1/2" poly SIPS so that the exterior wall XPS lines up with the perimeter XPS. Of course this extra XPS would add R10 to the walls as well. I calculate that, for our walls, there is 2586 gross sq. ft. Assuming the 2" XPS costs $1.00/sf and installation adds another $1, then my investment is $2/sf x 2586 = $5,172. (FYI, $2/sf is the difference in price between 4 1/2" SIPs and 6 1/2" SIPs for two companies I contacted.)
Or, do you think that I should change from a monolithic slab to another type of slab, such as a form of slab-on-grade shown on page 164, with insulation on the interior of perimeter? Or just go on ahead and have the perimeter slab insulation be covered with something like cement board and stick out 2 " or so beyond the wall above it? Or do you think my worries about cantilevering are not justified?
What do you think?
Thanks!
Steve |
|
| Eager to learn new things here in the foothills of the mountains of the Lincoln National Forest of New Mexico. |
|
|
|
|
adi43d
 New Member
 Posts:87
 |
| 03 Mar 2010 03:34 PM |
|
if somehow you'll get moisture between SIP and the extra layer of foam will be very difficult for the SIP to dry. I wouldn't add rigid insulation to a SIP wall (interior or exterior) because the installation and detailing becomes critical. If you really want to add consider some sort of spray foam. so water vapor doesnt represent an issue. good luck Adi
|
|
| http://torontonetzerohouse.blogspot.com/ |
|
|
altovintner
 New Member
 Posts:33
 |
| 06 Mar 2010 09:45 AM |
|
Posted By adi43d on 03 Mar 2010 03:34 PM if somehow you'll get moisture between SIP and the extra layer of foam will be very difficult for the SIP to dry. I wouldn't add rigid insulation to a SIP wall (interior or exterior) because the installation and detailing becomes critical. If you really want to add consider some sort of spray foam. so water vapor doesnt represent an issue.
good luck Adi
Thanks, Adi. I think you are right. I guess I need to consider another strategy. Regards, Steve |
|
| Eager to learn new things here in the foothills of the mountains of the Lincoln National Forest of New Mexico. |
|
|
SimonD
 Basic Member
 Posts:113

 |
| 07 Mar 2010 12:30 AM |
|
Altovintner,
When you say, "the notion of cantilevering just does not seem to make sense", I'm assuming what you really mean is that you feel it doesn't seem structurally sound. However, it is a structurally sound configuration and solves the problem of the extra thickness of insulation on the foundation. If you really understood how the structural loads were distributed and dispersed by SIPs, you would not be puzzled by the cantilevering. |
|
| Building Designer<br>PANELfusion, LLC, Tampa, FL<br>simon@panelfusion(dot com)<br>"Metal SIP Advocate" |
|
|
Greg Freyermuth
 Basic Member
 Posts:131
 |
| 07 Mar 2010 02:22 PM |
|
Steve, Are you guys in Alto? We are working in Timberon and Cloudcroft currently. Who are you using what alternative methods of heating are you going to use? If this is affordable we would like to discuss it with our clients currently entertaining mountain-sceond home scenarios. I have looked at PassivHaus, but my mind cannot get around metric, I guess they use U value, i.e. .10W/(m2K) and this makes no sense to me. Obviously super-insulating is one effective and cost effective method, but what about using a SIP floor and buinding with an insulated crawl space. How do the numbers work in this scenario and have you considered it? Thanks for the time. |
|
| Greg Freyermuth<br>915-256-7563<br>[email protected]<br> www.energreensips.com |
|
|
altovintner
 New Member
 Posts:33
 |
| 07 Mar 2010 06:31 PM |
|
Hello SimonD. Since I am a pilgrim in all this, it is good to hear from you about the cantilevering issue. I have done quite a bit of research on SIPs and believe that I do understand the load bearing "I-beam" type abilities of SIPs. My concern about it is with regard to the possibility of using a 4 1/2" poly SIP for the walls. If I choose to use 2" of XPS on the concrete perimeter, then the 4 1/2" SIP may have to be cantilevered 2" of the 4 1/2 ", or some 44%. Now, while I am not an engineer, I have a few fundamental questions about this. For one, would the 44% cantilevering be suitable in the area where I live with the highest high winds in the US? We are on the eastern side of the Sacramento mountains in south central New Mexico. The only blemish on our living in paradise out here is that it is nothing for the winds to blow in excess of 70 mph. Not for just a few minutes but 3 to 5 days without abatement. We had a period a couple of years ago where the winds blew in excess of 100 mph for over 24 hours! This is a formidable design issue. 2x6's 24" OC smart framing is totally out of the question, fyi. Hence, my bottom line is a concern about the structural integrity of such cantilevering in extreme situations. Otherwise I could use different types of SIPs and/or a different type of foundation. I sure hope my worries are not justified. However, I am trying to do my due diligence. Thanks for taking your time to share your thoughts with me.
Hi Greg. Yes, we are in Alto, about 1.5 miles from the Spencer Theater on NM 220. Right now, we are just doing preliminary plans for a build some 2 years out. Hence, for now, we have not chosen much of anything. Two of our neighbors out here used Thermocore SIPs on Clydesdale timberframe builds. It is because of their experience that I am pondering the poly SIPs. Not 100% sure yet, but, you get the picture. I have a contractor here who built about half of our current timberframe house working under a GC and then later went out on his own as a GC. He worked on one of the other houses out here with the SIPs. So he has experience putting up the SIPs. Plus he is someone who you can trust. Not to mention one heckuva a good carpenter.
We have two things that are free here: world class sunshine and wood. If I build a reasonably insulated and tight house, then we could use passive solar for 40 to 50% of the heating, plus a 55000 btu iron+soapstone wood stove (like the Fireview Wood Stove, www.woodstove.com.) Backup would be baseboard heaters with smart thermostats. Would put in an HRV. You mentioned the crawlspace idea. Yes, we are thinking about that and it depends on just where we build. If we build on a slope then the crawlspace option moves right into the picture. We have that right now. On the other hand, we already own 10 acres near here where the building envelope choices are all pretty much flat --- i.e., ideal for either monolithic slab or slab on grade. As you might already know, a large number of house builds here in Lincoln county are stemwall-crawlspace because of slopes.
As far as PassivHaus is concerned, as much as I would like to go all the way down that road, the math and costs just do not work for me. But I do intend to borrow what I can from the PH concept for parts of our house plan. Things like reduction of thermal bridging are good ideas, PH or otherwise. I suppose that is why I characterize our plan as a "PH Wannabe." |
|
| Eager to learn new things here in the foothills of the mountains of the Lincoln National Forest of New Mexico. |
|
|
SimonD
 Basic Member
 Posts:113

 |
| 08 Mar 2010 01:51 AM |
|
Altovintner,
Your reasoning is sound if you are sticking to a 4 1/2" SIP for your wall. You would need at least a 6 1/2" SIP to do the cantilever. So your choice becomes, do I increase the foam core thickness of my SIP by 2" and do the cantilever, or do I add 2" of foam to the exterior of the SIP and eliminate the cantilever. I guess either way you are needing 2" of foam thickness. Now you have to figure out which is the better choice for your circumstances. If your climate is dry, I wouldn't worry too much about moisture issues, so applying additional foam to the face of your SIPs should be ok. If you think your walls will be subjected to the forces of high winds and need the reinforcement, then additional bearing of the sill plate of the SIP wall on the edge of the slab makes sense. As mentioned above, in a climate with more moisture applying foam to the face of your SIPs could be problematic. The type of slab doesn't factor into the decision. If you went with the cantilever configuration then the top & bottom plates of your SIP wall would be more of a thermal bridge and not be as insulated as applying the additional foam, so that may also influence your choice. You are on the right track. |
|
| Building Designer<br>PANELfusion, LLC, Tampa, FL<br>simon@panelfusion(dot com)<br>"Metal SIP Advocate" |
|
|
altovintner
 New Member
 Posts:33
 |
| 08 Mar 2010 09:21 AM |
|
Posted By SimonD on 08 Mar 2010 01:51 AM Altovintner,
Your reasoning is sound if you are sticking to a 4 1/2" SIP for your wall. You would need at least a 6 1/2" SIP to do the cantilever. So your choice becomes, do I increase the foam core thickness of my SIP by 2" and do the cantilever, or do I add 2" of foam to the exterior of the SIP and eliminate the cantilever. I guess either way you are needing 2" of foam thickness. Now you have to figure out which is the better choice for your circumstances. If your climate is dry, I wouldn't worry too much about moisture issues, so applying additional foam to the face of your SIPs should be ok. If you think your walls will be subjected to the forces of high winds and need the reinforcement, then additional bearing of the sill plate of the SIP wall on the edge of the slab makes sense. As mentioned above, in a climate with more moisture applying foam to the face of your SIPs could be problematic. The type of slab doesn't factor into the decision. If you went with the cantilever configuration then the top & bottom plates of your SIP wall would be more of a thermal bridge and not be as insulated as applying the additional foam, so that may also influence your choice. You are on the right track. Hi Simon. Once again, I thank you very much for your counsel. Your thoughts are most appreciated and helpful to me as I ponder all this. Regards, Steve |
|
| Eager to learn new things here in the foothills of the mountains of the Lincoln National Forest of New Mexico. |
|
|
| You are not authorized to post a reply. |
|
Active Forums 4.1
 |
Membership: |
 |
Latest:
croccohvacusa |
 |
New Today:
0 |
 |
New Yesterday:
0 |
 |
Overall:
35027 |
 |
People Online: |
 |
Visitors:
240 |
 |
Members:
0 |
 |
Total:
240 |
|
|
|