Is DX good in bedrock?
Last Post 13 Jul 2009 11:03 PM by engineer. 9 Replies.
Printer Friendly
Sort:
PrevPrev NextNext
You are not authorized to post a reply.
Author Messages
propaneBeGoneUser is Offline
Basic Member
Basic Member
Send Private Message
Posts:106

--
11 Jul 2009 03:22 PM
Speaking of grout... We hit bedrock within 8' of the surface here in Southern NH.  Is that a better or worse conductive situation for DX vs. different soil types?


dbelisleUser is Offline
New Member
New Member
Send Private Message
Posts:12

--
11 Jul 2009 08:51 PM
Yes , it is good .....

Ledge is very good .... I am waiting to have my wells drilled for a DX system.....

I should hit ledge within 10 feet . I am in Western ,NH ......


Dave


geo fanUser is Offline
Basic Member
Basic Member
Send Private Message
Posts:408

--
11 Jul 2009 09:14 PM
depends on the type of rock vs the type of soil , some are better some a little some a lot , and some are worse
it realy is splittling hairs , except for the drill guy


Down2Earth GeothermalUser is Offline
New Member
New Member
Send Private Message
Posts:59

--
11 Jul 2009 09:29 PM
Bedrock almost has a higher thermal conductivity than regolith (i.e. unconsolidated deposits). The only exception is saturated sands/gravels that are highly transmissive to groundwater and then it is due to the moving water transferring the heat.



propaneBeGoneUser is Offline
Basic Member
Basic Member
Send Private Message
Posts:106

--
12 Jul 2009 06:05 AM
As far as I know, it's all granite. Some places we couldn't get more than 4' down when digging the basement.


Palace GeothermalUser is Offline
Veteran Member
Veteran Member
Send Private Message
Posts:1609

--
12 Jul 2009 11:36 AM
this chart tells the story





Attachment: vertical loops.pdf

Dewayne Dean

<br>www.PalaceGeothermal.com<br>Why settle for 90% when you can have 400%<br>We heat and cool with dirt!<br>visit- http://welserver.com/WEL0114/- to see my system
Down2Earth GeothermalUser is Offline
New Member
New Member
Send Private Message
Posts:59

--
12 Jul 2009 07:18 PM
Something else to consider is that DX is not sized based on the subsurface strata, but rather the mean earth temperature. This is due to the face that DX relies on a much higher temperature gradient associated with the latent or phase-change heat exchange method it utilizes.


propaneBeGoneUser is Offline
Basic Member
Basic Member
Send Private Message
Posts:106

--
13 Jul 2009 10:09 AM
Thanks Dewayne, that chart makes bedrock look fine.

The phase change idea does sound better than moving all that water around for a small delta, I like it!


Bruce FreyUser is Offline
Basic Member
Basic Member
Send Private Message
Posts:429

--
13 Jul 2009 12:23 PM
Posted By geodean on 07/12/2009 11:36 AM
this chart tells the story



What do the "cond" and "diff" numbers mean, and what are their signicance?

Bruce


engineerUser is Offline
Veteran Member
Veteran Member
Send Private Message
Posts:2749

--
13 Jul 2009 11:03 PM
Conductivity and Diffusivity.

Ability of ground to provide / absorb / dissipate heat. Factors in chart are entered into loop design software and impact loop length needed per system ton. The factors for the various soil types listed will result in greatly different loop designs. It is critical to system performance and cost of operation that this be gotten right.


Curt Kinder <br><br>

The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is - Winston Churchill <br><br><a href="http://www.greenersolutionsair.com">www.greenersolutionsair.com</a>
You are not authorized to post a reply.

Active Forums 4.1
Membership Membership: Latest New User Latest: croccohvacusa New Today New Today: 0 New Yesterday New Yesterday: 0 User Count Overall: 35027
People Online People Online: Visitors Visitors: 179 Members Members: 0 Total Total: 179
Copyright 2011 by BuildCentral, Inc.   Terms Of Use  Privacy Statement