|
You are not authorized to post a reply.
|
Prev Next
|
| Author |
Messages |
|
Dug Registered Users
Posts:36

 |
| 08/11/2008 10:42 PM |
|
In an effort to maximize r-value as economically as possible, consider the following...
Take a simple 1800 sq ft rancher and build with 2x4 exterior walls, then build a second wall inside the exterior wall with a 1 inch dead air gap. Fill each cavity with r-13 fiberglass, vapor barrier on the interior and tyvek on the exterior.
Compared to a 2x6 stick wall with r-19, you have 27% greater r value for about $400 extra cost (not including labor). Compared to foam, it's half the cost.
Crazy?... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brock Registered Users
Posts:209


 |
| 08/12/2008 1:02 PM |
|
One problem might be humidity being trapped between walls. I toured a home one that was called an envelope home. It literally had double exterior walls. The space between the two was circulated by itself, not heating or cooling, but it was a storage space. The oddest part was the windows, with and inside windows in front of an exterior window. You have the same sq ft of glass, but it certainly didn't let in nearly as much light.
I would think the cost would be a lot more then $400 for materials. Heck two windows and your there. I might add 2 inches of pink form to the exterior before siding. Or maybe 1 inch on the interior side before sheet rock? We did that in our basement and the electrical guys hated us because none of the boxes stuck out far enough and every box had to add a spacer. |
|
Green Bay, WI. - geothermal heated indoor pool with a small solar setup |
|
|
MDiver Registered Users
Posts:28

 |
| 08/12/2008 4:47 PM |
|
| why not just build a 2x6 wall and concentrate on building it tight, or forget about using batt insulation and go to a spray foam as this will be more efficient than what you are proposing (even in you 2x4 walls). On a side not please don't base all of your decisions on r-value (it really isn't the best measure of walls true performance). |
|
|
|
|
Dug Registered Users
Posts:36

 |
| 08/12/2008 5:29 PM |
|
Brock,
The moisture in the dead air space was brougth up on another thread and has me somewhat concerned. But, it seems a vapor barrier on the interior wall and tyvek on the exterior will allow the wall to breathe should moisture enter the dead air space. (?)
As for the cost, a 2x6 is nearly double the cost of a 2x4. And, there would not be double windows, each window would be trimmed out with jamb extensions similar to a SIP house.
I looked at foam boards on the exterior, but you are looking at a significant price increase (about $1 per sq ft versus 25 cents per sq ft for r 13 fiberglass).
Just thinking out loud and trying to find the weak points before I go through with this crazy idea... : -) |
|
|
|
|
Dug Registered Users
Posts:36

 |
| 08/12/2008 5:38 PM |
|
The double 2x4 is only slightly more expensive than a single 2x6. In terms of building tight, the double 2x4 would negate thermal transfer via the studs as each one would be indepent of the interior/exterior wall.
Spray foam is ridiculously expensive! While it provides a higher r value per inch, deeper walls with fiberglass allows one to acheive equivalent r values with much less cost.
If I don't consider r value, what measure whould I use? Take away air infiltration, and R is a great measure of the effectiveness of insulation...
I know there are some that believe in foam ( I think it's great, just too expensive when other possibilities exist.) This will be my personal residence and I want the very best product for the money I can find.
Thanks for the reply.
Dug |
|
|
|
|
thevidy Registered Users
Posts:7

 |
| 08/13/2008 2:31 PM |
|
Dug, You might want to check out www.bestofbuildingscience.com they have some wonderful info on insulation and how it should be integrated in your building system. Be careful what might be best in the southeast may be altogether different then say the midwest or the northwest. |
|
|
|
|
Jelly Registered Users
Posts:274

 |
| 08/13/2008 8:41 PM |
|
| Dug, where are you building? Climate will definitely have a bearing on insulation for various reasons. But having said that, fiberglass batts don't get much love by anybody around here, regardless of the geographical location. |
|
|
|
|
Dug Registered Users
Posts:36

 |
| 08/13/2008 9:47 PM |
|
I'm in Kansas City.
Fiberglass has taken a beating compared to foam, but is it really that bad? Take away air infiltration and one insulation is no better than another...? With fiberglass being so cheap and the price of wood down, one could insulate to a much higher r value as compared to foam. Not really looking for an argument, just looking for the best bang for the buck. And considering fuel costs, maximizing insulation has never been more important.
l will break ground on my home later this month. The basement will be ICF. If things go well, the first floor will be ICF also. However, if I have problems with the basement, I want a back up plan, thus the double wall with fiberglass. We built with SIPs a couple years ago. I liked the product, but am looking at various options.
|
|
|
|
|
Jelly Registered Users
Posts:274

 |
| 08/13/2008 11:07 PM |
|
Posted By Dug on 08/13/2008 9:47 PM ...but is it really that bad?
I know I'm not alone here when I say yes, it really is that bad. Some even see it as a big hoax. I don't know about all that, but there certainly are much better options.
|
|
|
|
|
Dug Registered Users
Posts:36

 |
| 08/13/2008 11:32 PM |
|
Going with my gut, I would agree with you. But, considering the price difference, I want to fully investigate the possibilities with fiberglass. Take away air infiltration and what makes an r20 foam better than an r20 fiberglass? Certainly, one would need a deeper cavity for the fiberglass to acheive the higher r, but...
As I said, if all goes well, I will go with ICF on basement and 1st floor, then fill the attic with an r50 cellulose. But I can't help but wonder about the value of fiberglass.
Thanks for your replys.
|
|
|
|
|
Brock Registered Users
Posts:209


 |
| 08/14/2008 7:33 PM |
|
| I think R20 is R20. The problem is foam will stay R20 unless you break it off. You can get it wet, try to squeeze it, try to blow air though it and unless it is physically broken it is still R20. Fiberglass set in can be the same R value, but if it gets damp, or somehow slumps down or is pushed aside by wind, electricians, plumbers, sheet rockers or whomever, then you R value is greatly reduced or even eliminated. I can't tell you how many times in remodeling or after the fact looking at an exterior wall in one spot that is really cold, you open it up and guess what. The insulation is all bunched up, pushed aside or just plain missing. |
|
Green Bay, WI. - geothermal heated indoor pool with a small solar setup |
|
|
MDiver Registered Users
Posts:28

 |
| 08/14/2008 11:29 PM |
|
| Batting an empty wall cavity (no wires, plumbing, vents, etc.) isn't so bad as long as you have it installed correctly, the problem with batt insulation is that it gets pretty hard to do a good job of insulating a real wall (full of wires, etc.). The insulator has to split a batt and do their best to ensure a good job. Even if a wall is sealled up tight, batt insulation looses some of its efficieny due to convection currents within the batt where it is not correctly installed, or split around a wire or anywhere a void occurs in the batt. |
|
|
|
|
PatrickT Registered Users
Posts:138

 |
| 08/15/2008 7:34 AM |
|
Dug,
The key points are; Thermal bridging, R-value and air infiltration. I'm not a fan of fiberglass but if you want to use it....I'd go with a 2x4 frame wall, sealed in from the inside with a spray foam. They can do a 1/2" layer and this will seal all your osb to 2x4 frame. Then fill the cavities with fiberglass and sheet the exterior with 2" foam. This gets all the key points fairly low cost. You could reduce the osb use everywhere except the corners by going from 1-1/2" foam over the osb to 2" foam over the studs.
Patrick T |
|
|
|
|
egouin Registered Users
Posts:21

 |
| 08/16/2008 10:10 AM |
|
|
Dug,
I hope you can find someone to build what you want. In my experience,
builders tend to stick with what they know. When you ask for something
different the price goes up much higher than it really should.
If you choose to use fiberglass insulation, you might consider using closed
cell spray foam to seal the structure (as others have mentioned). If you
do the heat load calculations (or have someone do it for you), the air changes
per hour (ACH) value has a huge effect on your heat loads. Fiberglass
provides no air sealing whatsoever, and loses most (if not all) of its
insulating properties with a little air flow. Build tight.
Ventilate right.
Check out the status of our project... perhaps the most energy efficient
modular home ever built - www.GouinGreen.com.
Good luck with your project. Ed
|
|
|
|
|
Dan Morrison Registered Users
Posts:10

 |
| 08/16/2008 2:46 PM |
|
Dug, here are a few comments about your plan:
Insulation and air sealing are the best investment you can make right now. You can cut your usage by 40%, which is quite a pay off, but when skyrocketing energy prices are factored in, the payoff is huge. Don't skimp. But you don't need to throw your money away either.
Exterior foam will do everything you need cheaper than spray foam. 1-1/2 in. of rigid foam on the outside of your walls will eliminate the thermal bridge, make a nice air barrier, keep the interior framing warm, and act as a drainage plane behind your siding. Skip the plastic vapor barrier on the inside -- it won't help and it may hurt in your climate (during AC season). As Dr. Joe says "Houses get wet in summer and they rot in winter" because AC units pull exterior humidity inwards, the plastic traps it there and the wall can't dry out in the winter. Vinyl wallpaper counts as a vapor barrier, incidentally. (http://www.buildingscience.com/documents/digests/bsd-106-understanding-vapor-barriers/view?searchterm=vapor%20barrier)
With a good air barrier fiberglass batts CAN POTENTIALLY work. But everything has to be perfect -- 2% voids can slash performance by up to 40% (surf arounf the Oak Ridge Nat'l Lab web site for a lot of info on insulation performance). It's much easier to get excellent installation with a blow-in type insulation like cellulose, BIB, or Spyder. Exterior foam and dense pack cellulose would be a super good and fairly inexpensive choice.
Double walls use way too much wood for what you get. And it doesn't seem like the greenest choice, using twice as much wood as you need to. If you really want deep walls, you could do what the people at e-colab (www.e-colab.org) do: use I-joists for studs.
The "envelope house" referenced earlier is sort of a gimmic. Read about it at Environmental Building News. Why try to reinvent the wheel? theree are plenty of ways to build super efficient houses.
The comment about builders liking to stick to what they know is true, but there are some who are ahead of the curve. Fine one of those guys to anything other than standard, leaky, coinstruction. Remember, code is the worst you can build without going to jail.
Good luck, Dan www.thegreenbbuildingadvisors.blogspot.com
|
|
|
|
|
Dug Registered Users
Posts:36

 |
| 08/17/2008 3:27 PM |
|
Thanks to all for the replys. I have been surfing this site for quite some time and have gained considerable knowledge. I will break ground on our new home on the 25th and will personally oversee all aspects of the project. This is the house I plan to stay in until they carry me out, so i want to ensure everything is perfect.
|
|
|
|
|
Ebo Registered Users
Posts:6

 |
| 08/17/2008 6:58 PM |
|
| Anyone ever put the foam directly on the studs 1 1/2 or 2" and then osb over for a nail base for the exterior finishes? |
|
|
|
|
PatrickT Registered Users
Posts:138

 |
| 08/19/2008 6:08 AM |
|
Ebo,
You loose a lot of the intended sheer strength of the osb sheet when the nails are going through the foam. The osb needs to be against the stud.
Patrick T |
|
|
|
|
SoCalScott Registered Users
Posts:40

 |
| 08/19/2008 9:59 PM |
|
The basement will be ICF. If things go well, the first floor will be ICF also. However, if I have problems with the basement, I want a back up plan, thus the double wall with fiberglass. Remember, if you have problems with ICFs, they will be with the contractor, not the product. Make sure that your installer is QUALIFIED and has experience. If you have concerns, have your local ICF supplier / tech support go to the jobsite during installation to evaluate techniques. Also, make sure they use ICF bracing/scaffold & don't try to use 2xs to brace the wall and make sure they understand concrete mixes.
Every year over $100 million of ICFs are sold in the U.S. and I would guess that 99.9% of the installation have no problems.
|
|
|
|
|
freakboy Registered Users
Posts:32

 |
| 08/19/2008 10:04 PM |
|
Dug, I too believe that spray foam is expensive but you get what you pay for. I have owned my home long enough to remodel the bathroom again.. the first time I took great care when insulating with fiberglass to fit it just right. When I recently remodeled that room again I found the fiberglass had gaps and those telltale dark spots on the pink which showed the air leaks. I again used fiberglass but also added a layer of 1" foam under the sheetrock. I used this system on the rest of the upstairs remodel a few years earlier and have beeen very happy with the results. With all I have learned from this site I would probably use spray foam next time. There is a fairly new company out of FLA which came up with a new spray foam system. The system which uses foam cartridges like caulking and can be shipped via regular mail which cuts down on the cost considerably. This foam system allegedly has a quick learning curve for DIY. I am glad to hear Dan state that rigid foam can do all spray foam can... and more by reducing thermal bridging. With a brick house that was not an option for me.
|
|
Dont run thru the forest with your face on fire
|
|
|
|
| You are not authorized to post a reply. |
|
|
|
ActiveForums 3.6
|
Professionals Serving Your Location:
GBT Project Albums:
|