Amvic Banner
 
 Register  Login   
User Name: Password:
Learn about green building products and methods Find answers, products, and people Connect with homeowners, professionals, and suppliers Register for free at GreenBuildingTalk
Unanswered Active Topics
Forums Search Members
Forums > Green Building Forums > General Forum - Residential > Subject: Heat load and HRV efficiency

You are not authorized to post a reply.   
Prev Next
Author Messages
hgoedUser is Offline
Registered Users
New Member
New Member
Send a message
Posts:10


07/24/2009 2:04 PM  

Does anybody have a formula or suggestions for calculating the heat load of forced ventilation through an HRV?  Specifically, I'd like to figure out the practical difference (as far as load on my heating system) between using a standard HRV with about 74% sensible effectiveness vs. upgrading to a dual core HRV with about 95% sensible effectiveness, given the same air flow.

Thanks.

Jesse ThompsonUser is Offline
Registered Users
New Member
New Member
Send a message
Posts:60


07/24/2009 4:18 PM  
PHPP (the Passivehouse design software) has this capacity.

If you are in the US, there is a list of local PH consultants here: http://passivehouse.us/passiveHouse/PHIUSHome.html

Jesse Thompson
Kaplan Thompson Architects
http://www.kaplanthompson.com/
Portland, ME

Beautiful, Sustainable, Attainable
Duane AmundsonUser is Offline
Registered Users
New Member
New Member
Send a message
Posts:8


08/13/2009 4:19 PM  

Before changing units, compare apples to apples using HVI certification, qualify airflows and electrical use.  Many air exchangers test their units at the lowest possible airflows to come up with big numbers that are not practical, or at the airflow you will be using.  Unless units are independently HVI certified, the numbers are unsubstantiated.  Qualify same efficiency number descriptions by HVI.  There are two numbers given on this report; Sensible Recovery Efficiency and Apparent Sensible Effectiveness (usually @ 10 points higher), and these will be qualified by airflow, for example 74% Sensible Recovery Efficiency @ 120 cfm.  The unit you may be looking to buy could be 95% Apparent Sensible Effectiveness @ 64cfm.  They might actually be rated closer than you think.  Look at watts per cfm. and Total Recovery Efficiency (@95F, a summer number).  You may be spending a lot of money for very low return or even a loss.

hgoedUser is Offline
Registered Users
New Member
New Member
Send a message
Posts:10


08/14/2009 5:04 PM  
I found in some literature put out by Bryant a comparison of their various units and their effect on heating and cooling load. The difference between their high efficiency 190cfm model, HRVBBLVU1200, which is the same as the Venmar and VanEE units and has an EFFICIENCY of 84% (I think that number should take into account the fan motor) vs. their regular 190cfm model which has an efficiency of 64% averages about 2500btu/hr for the heating season. I'm assuming that is btu/hr that the air is being exchanged, but I'm not sure. I have yet to calculate how this would translate into energy used and $$.
You are not authorized to post a reply.
Forums > Green Building Forums > General Forum - Residential > Heat load and HRV efficiency



ActiveForums 3.6
Find a Green Building Professional
Get Listed
Professionals Serving
Your Location:
Copyright 2009 by BuildCentral, Inc.   Terms Of Use  Privacy Statement