Posted By BadgerBoilerMN on 04 Mar 2010 09:11 AM
The use of foil (of any kind) in any radiant floor application, adds vary little (if anything) to the overall efficiency of the system. Good money is better spent on real insulation of any verifiable quality.
The advocacy of foil should be a warning sign to the savvy homeowner.
This string smells of astroturf.
In plated radiant systems, the value is VERY close to zero, since the emissivity of the aluminum plates is extremely small relative to that of bare PEX tubing and bare wood. In a plated system the PEX temps are lower, the amount of exposed wood is a fraction of the total and the net flux of radiated heat into the cavity that the radiant barrier is reflecting is already less than 1/3 (maybe under 1/4) of what it would be with 180F water in a suspended tube or staple up.
And the fact that you have to leave a gap between the foil and radiating surface for it to work at all makes it worth somewhat
less than nothing since it creates a potential thermal-bypass channel for air currents to flow, which wouldn't be there if the fiber was snugged right up against the plates. Only with the tightest installation methods is it a net-positive, and getting it up to even net-zero benefit requires some attention to detail. There's some evidence that there might be some benefit with the fiber snugged against the plates and the RB on the side away from the plates, but not enough to make it cost effective at low temp. A best-case laboratory scenario gives RB about an R6-effective if you have an inch of air-gap, but filling that inch with another ~R3.6 of fiber is more reliable.