Most efficient unit available?
Last Post 02 Jun 2008 01:05 PM by engineer. 16 Replies.
Printer Friendly
Sort:
PrevPrev NextNext
You are not authorized to post a reply.
Author Messages
GRickardUser is Offline
New Member
New Member
Send Private Message
Posts:45

--
03 Mar 2008 04:02 PM
   I recently had a 3 ton dual capacity Water Furnace Envision unit installed in my new 2400' (main floor)ICF house. the dealer tells me that it is the most efficient water to air unit on the market. The manufacturer posts a 30 EER  and 5 COP.
   Just out of curiosity, is this unit far above other brands or about the same as the rest of the pack?

   At this point (still under construction) I'm heating the main floor, no door to the insulated attic, three ducts to the full basement, and an open connecting door to the insulated garage. Thats around 6000 square feet and I haven't seen it go past stage 1 heat. So far I'm pretty impressed with geo.
Palace GeothermalUser is Offline
Veteran Member
Veteran Member
Send Private Message
Posts:1609

--
03 Mar 2008 04:14 PM
Geo is pretty impressive.  :)

Climate Master touts their latest as producing 27 EER and 4.6 COP.

Of course any EER and COP numbers are totally dependent on what the entering water temp is.
Dewayne Dean

<br>www.PalaceGeothermal.com<br>Why settle for 90% when you can have 400%<br>We heat and cool with dirt!<br>visit- http://welserver.com/WEL0114/- to see my system
tuffluckdrillerUser is Offline
Advanced Member
Advanced Member
Send Private Message
Posts:630
Avatar

--
04 Mar 2008 12:44 AM
Water furnace does have that COP and EER, but only if you maintain an entering water temp. of 53 deg. or something. It's only on an open loop (pump and dump) not on their closed loop. They get to make that claim, only with fine print...
Clark Timothy ([email protected])<br>Geothermal Heat Pumps: Heating and Cooling that's Dirt Cheap!<br>www.pinksgeothermal.com
KlorinthUser is Offline
New Member
New Member
Send Private Message
Posts:33

--
05 Mar 2008 10:24 PM
I recently picked up a couple of quotes from a local installer. They have presented me with some interesting numbers.

Three different setups were presented. Two single stage and one two stage. The prices basically went up $1200 for each, $24K-$26.5K

The interesting thing was that the annual electricity savings between the lowest and highest was $57. Compare that to the $2600 difference in installation means it would take about 45 years for the more expensive to make itself worth it. Am I wrong here? What am I missing? It is looking like the differences in efficiency are minimal once you look at actual $ savings.

I can see how you can get potentially large differences from company to company, but this seems fairly minimal for the same companies supposed improved model.

How about some numbers:

WaterFurnace Priemer 3 Ton vs Envision 3 Ton Dual Capacity.

Heating Load = 65.3 million btu
Auxillary = Priemer 177 kwh   vs   Envision 59 kwh
COP = Priemer 3.08   vs   Envision 3.46

Cooling Load = 7.1 million btu
EER = Priemer 18.3   vs   Envision 26.1

DHW Load = 13 million btu
COP = Priemer 1.66   vs   Envision 1.61

Heating Run Time = Priemer 2743   vs   Envision 3255

Cooling Run Time = Priemer 187   vs   Envision 216

I'm just having trouble seeing how I can justify spending an extra $2600 for only $57/year savings.
HELP!
Palace GeothermalUser is Offline
Veteran Member
Veteran Member
Send Private Message
Posts:1609

--
05 Mar 2008 11:15 PM
I don't understand why the more efficient unit has longer run times in both heating and cooling. Unless running on first stage is counted as full speed run time.

Did you ask the installer the same question? I would be interested in what he says.

Do you live in a high humidity area? Since you are very heating dominate, you might want a two stage unit so that when cooling you can have longer run times on first stage to better dehumidify.

That would be the only reason I can see to pay for a two stage unit.
Dewayne Dean

<br>www.PalaceGeothermal.com<br>Why settle for 90% when you can have 400%<br>We heat and cool with dirt!<br>visit- http://welserver.com/WEL0114/- to see my system
KlorinthUser is Offline
New Member
New Member
Send Private Message
Posts:33

--
05 Mar 2008 11:22 PM
I did ask about the run times, mainly because of the high humidity that we can get here. The reponse was that they are counting the half speed time along with the full speed. So the numbers do not differentiat between the two.

I do like the idea of the longer run times in summer, but is it worth it? Or is it better to simply use a stand alone dehumidifier? Cost to benefit ratio?
Palace GeothermalUser is Offline
Veteran Member
Veteran Member
Send Private Message
Posts:1609

--
05 Mar 2008 11:26 PM
Where I live, we don't have to worry about humidity. I really can't offer any advice to you there. How much does a stand alone dehumidifier cost to purchase and run?
Dewayne Dean

<br>www.PalaceGeothermal.com<br>Why settle for 90% when you can have 400%<br>We heat and cool with dirt!<br>visit- http://welserver.com/WEL0114/- to see my system
tuffluckdrillerUser is Offline
Advanced Member
Advanced Member
Send Private Message
Posts:630
Avatar

--
06 Mar 2008 01:10 AM
The longer run time is a good sign to me that it's not just the efficiency difference. Usually with longer run times, there will be a more comfortable, even temperature in the home. It's definitely not just about paying for a little bit better efficiency. Rather, it's about comfort. That's really why you want a heating and cooling system anyway, right? For the comfort!

Most likely, any one of the three systems would be comfortable, because they are geothermal. However, I would bet the most efficient unit is more comfortable than the less efficient ones.
Clark Timothy ([email protected])<br>Geothermal Heat Pumps: Heating and Cooling that's Dirt Cheap!<br>www.pinksgeothermal.com
TechGromitUser is Offline
Advanced Member
Advanced Member
Send Private Message
Posts:634

--
06 Mar 2008 08:51 AM
What is the big deal with 2 stage systems anyway? So what the blower runs at two different speeds, I thought the lion share of energy consumed was used by the compressor. I would think you would want the blower speed to be fast as possible to minimize the amount of time the compressor is on.
 
As for the EER and COP ratings, so the manufactures tweak there numbers to get the highest rating possible? So when your shopping for systems, you could be comparing apples to oranges since they are using different input temperatures to get there ratings.  

 

Palace GeothermalUser is Offline
Veteran Member
Veteran Member
Send Private Message
Posts:1609

--
06 Mar 2008 08:56 AM
On a two stage the compressor has two output levels. Stage one is usually 40% of capacity. It is not just the blower running slower.

Even though the advertising can be mis leading the ARI numbers are all done when testing at 32° incoming water temps. This is so you can compare apples to apples.
Dewayne Dean

<br>www.PalaceGeothermal.com<br>Why settle for 90% when you can have 400%<br>We heat and cool with dirt!<br>visit- http://welserver.com/WEL0114/- to see my system
KlorinthUser is Offline
New Member
New Member
Send Private Message
Posts:33

--
06 Mar 2008 10:16 PM
So i've run some of the numbers on a few different dehumidifiers that I might use (i have two already). I'm a little disturbed as to how high the consumption can be with these.

The combo air conditioner/dehumidifier is up to $246/150 day run. That 24.1 kwh/day @ $0.068.
Others run closer to $192/150 day run. 18.84 kwh/day @$0.068.

Now these are all removing a range of 50-80 pts/day. What can a geo system do compared with these? Same amounts? Less? More? Obviously they can do it with less power. Anything else?

The other down side of the standalone units is the heat that they produce. I can't quantify that though.
caja_caUser is Offline
New Member
New Member
Send Private Message
Posts:14

--
06 Mar 2008 10:20 PM
is that with running a desupe?
GRickardUser is Offline
New Member
New Member
Send Private Message
Posts:45

--
07 Mar 2008 08:20 AM
Klorinth, 
   What part of the country are you in? $26.5k seems pretty high compared to the cost in western KY. Maybe its just something thats less expensive here, I don't know, but the 3 ton Envision unit installed with desuperheater, horizontal loop, and all metal duct work(no flex) was less than $14k.

Greg
KlorinthUser is Offline
New Member
New Member
Send Private Message
Posts:33

--
07 Mar 2008 09:23 AM
Yes to the Desupr.
$26.5K is with everything you mentioned except vertical 800', not horizontal. I'm still waiting on a horizontal quote and a well to well.
Drilling runs about $22.50/foot standard, cheaper with geo installation but still costs.

I have a possible four more quotes to come in, so things may change, but the cheapest i think I might get is about $20K.

Oh ya... I'm in Manitoba Canada.
[/quote][/quote]
ANdadUser is Offline
New Member
New Member
Send Private Message
Posts:91

--
29 May 2008 08:15 AM
"Of course any EER and COP numbers are totally dependent on what the entering water temp is."

So if you are going to compare units can you just look at their tables and pick a constant entering water temp (say 50 degrees) and then compare the COP at that temp?
Palace GeothermalUser is Offline
Veteran Member
Veteran Member
Send Private Message
Posts:1609

--
29 May 2008 10:20 AM
Posted By Todd6286 on 05/29/2008 8:15 AM


So if you are going to compare units can you just look at their tables and pick a constant entering water temp (say 50 degrees) and then compare the COP at that temp?

That is how I would do it.
Dewayne Dean

<br>www.PalaceGeothermal.com<br>Why settle for 90% when you can have 400%<br>We heat and cool with dirt!<br>visit- http://welserver.com/WEL0114/- to see my system
engineerUser is Offline
Veteran Member
Veteran Member
Send Private Message
Posts:2749

--
02 Jun 2008 01:05 PM
I compared CM and WF and the Envision series seemed to be about 10% more efficient. That and their heat exchangers run at lower heads, useful in my situation. Definitely only compare COPs and EERs at same water and air conditions (flows AND temps). Advertised efficiencies are supposed to be at ARI-standard conditions, leveling the playing field. Envision gets 30 EER with 3 ton unit (only) at low speed at ARI standard 59 degree groundwater temp. CM around 27 EER at same conditions

Standalone dehus are fairly cheap but typically noisy and quite inefficient. Exception is those by Therma-stor, but those ain't cheap. Any central AC, geo or conventional, will typically remove much more water than a portable dehu, but the compressor needs long run times to do it - hence the interest in 2 speed systems - longer run times at low speed.

Two speed systems offer greater comfort (less noise, better dehumidification) along with greater efficiency

Dehus add sensible heat to the surrounding air at the rate of (3.413 Btu / hr per running Watt) + ~1000 Btus for every pint of water removed. Hows that for quantification? As a practical matter, it tends to mean that rooms with operating dehus are quite a bit warmer. This is nice in case of a cool damp basement in a heating climate / season, but miserable during cooling season.

A single speed unit along with a portable dehu waould result in less comfort at likely greater cost than a 2 speed without a dehu.

Curt Kinder <br><br>

The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is - Winston Churchill <br><br><a href="http://www.greenersolutionsair.com">www.greenersolutionsair.com</a>
You are not authorized to post a reply.

Active Forums 4.1
Membership Membership: Latest New User Latest: Scottnorton New Today New Today: 1 New Yesterday New Yesterday: 1 User Count Overall: 34728
People Online People Online: Visitors Visitors: 150 Members Members: 0 Total Total: 150
Copyright 2011 by BuildCentral, Inc.   Terms Of Use  Privacy Statement