davewick
 New Member
 Posts:13
 |
| 07 Sep 2008 08:54 PM |
|
I've just spend the last 2 hours with our backhoe operator digging test
pits across the back yard looking to see what the depth is to bedrock.
Just to give everyone the sense of the site I'm hoping to install in...
We live a the base of a mountain in western Massachusetts and based on the test pits the water table is about 5 feet down in most places. This would make sense given that just to the
south of my property there's an intermittent stream coming off the
hill, and even my basement has an intermittent streaming flowing
through it! I'm looking to swing a series of 4 800' 3/4" pipe slinky
coils across the backyard and wrapping around the north side of the
house (I'm installing a 4 ton Tranquility 27). The test pits we just
dug show that bedrock for most of the southern end of the property is
about 5.5 to 6 feet down. As you move north it becomes progressively
deeper, but this part of the site is complicated by the fact that there
are 100' white pines covering this part of the property.
So, the question is, in Massachusetts does it even make sense to install the pipes in
the region with the 5.5 to 6 deep bedrock? From what I've been told 6-7 feet is ideal in my region. Do I get any benefit from
the fact that the soil at that depth is saturated for most of the year? Or does
it make sense to bite the bullet and start cutting down trees to the north to take
advantage of the ability to dig deeper. I'm not a tree hugger (not that
there is anything wrong with that!), it's just the fact I don't want to
spend the extra $1000's to take down some very beautiful 100 year old trees.
Suggestions appreciated.
Thanks
David |
|
|
|
|
|
|
WEL0058
 New Member
 Posts:41
 |
| 07 Sep 2008 09:35 PM |
|
Hi Dave,
Your frost depth in your area is about 4' correct?
I do not see you having any problems. It sounds like you have an excellent situation: Trench depth, high soil moisture, bedrock thermal mass.
Most trenches are dug 5' to 7' deep. Plus with the high moisture content of the soil, you should have excellent thermal conductivity. You may want to dig your trenches down to the bedrock, bed the trench with a 3" layer of soil and lay the horizontal slinky on this bed. You can also added more soil on top of the loop field surface to increase its depth. How long are your trenches going to be?
My situation was after digging the first trench, the depth at the end was only 2' down to bedrock. Had to relocated the loop field which had some of the pipe laying on bedrock at 4' depth. Measuring each loop temperature, I can not see any major difference to the one trench at 7' depth.
You should have a glycol or methanol antifreeze solution in the loop to prevent freezing.
Bob
|
|
|
|
|
Palace Geothermal
 Veteran Member
 Posts:1609
 |
| 07 Sep 2008 10:26 PM |
|
I agree. No sense cutting down the trees. If you can add extra dirt on top of the slinkies, it will improve your loop performance. |
|
Dewayne Dean <br>www.PalaceGeothermal.com<br>Why settle for 90% when you can have 400%<br>We heat and cool with dirt!<br>visit- http://welserver.com/WEL0114/- to see my system |
|
|
joe.ami
 Veteran Member
 Posts:4377

 |
| 11 Sep 2008 12:19 AM |
|
Frost line is the key question. In MI, 5 to 6 feet is fine. Did wonder about trench length, the first thing that jumped out at me in your question was size of your slinkies. We can go as short as 110'/ton here with a 20 degree minimum design temp for a 4' of 3/4"pipe /foot of trench. Soil obviously matters, but you are approaching twice my minimum design length. perhaps depth gets easier if runs are shorter. Check the design. Joe |
|
Joe Hardin www.amicontracting.com We Dig Comfort! www.doityourselfgeothermal.com Dig Your Own Comfort! |
|
|