Don't Wait
Last Post 03 Oct 2008 09:14 AM by senecarr. 92 Replies.
Printer Friendly
Sort:
PrevPrev NextNext
You are not authorized to post a reply.
Page 3 of 5 << < 12345 > >>
Author Messages
Bruce FreyUser is Offline
Basic Member
Basic Member
Send Private Message
Posts:429

--
21 Sep 2008 03:27 PM
The middle column that you added is a bit of a red herring as you are really comparing future value to present value.  I think the real payback time is when NPV = 0 (sometime between years 12 and 13)

Now that Pandora's box is open, the question everyone needs to ask is "as compared to what?"  A good use of a NPV would be to compare one solution to another, i.e., a GSHP compared natural gas heating and regular air conditoning or a mini split system.  Again, these are better comparative tools than for absolute predictions.  Again, you can't put NPV (or ROI) in the bank.

ROI is not rally a valid tool for this, in my opinion.

I really suggest that anyone who is interested in using financial analysis tools do a little study so you do not misrepresnt yourself (easy to do).  It is not rocket science, but it does take a bit of understanding.  I am not a financial guy, but I have learned a bit by osmosis over the past 30 years working for a real estate developer and hanging around with some really smart guys.

Bruce


BrockUser is Offline
Advanced Member
Advanced Member
Send Private Message
Posts:599
Avatar

--
21 Sep 2008 08:41 PM
Ahhhh, I wasn't thinking when I did that, I was just looking at the crossing "$0" time, but I see what your saying. At my job I have just enough financial knowledge to mess things up ;)

I do think for most people though who don't use time of use or tiered electrical rates the payback is typically further out then 5 years. Of course it all depends on what you currently have for heating, what your current cost is for that “fuel” and what your electricity cost is and what it will be next year and the year after and so on.


Green Bay, WI. - 4 ton horizontal goethermal, 16k gallon indoor pool, 3kw solar PV setup, 2 ton air to air HP, 3400 sq ft
BrockUser is Offline
Advanced Member
Advanced Member
Send Private Message
Posts:599
Avatar

--
21 Sep 2008 08:47 PM
I pulled that "total" line I added back out.


Green Bay, WI. - 4 ton horizontal goethermal, 16k gallon indoor pool, 3kw solar PV setup, 2 ton air to air HP, 3400 sq ft
joe.amiUser is Offline
Veteran Member
Veteran Member
Send Private Message
Posts:4377
Avatar

--
21 Sep 2008 10:11 PM
Again, I can only speak to a heating dominated climate, but 5 year paybacks are conservative against fuel oil or LP and that is not calculating in equipment replacement which is often due within 5 years and always due within life span of new equipment.
NPV's are way more useful in areas where folks buy "it" because they can afford to. In my area people with modest means and perhaps no investment strategy are buying geo because they can't afford not to. Fossil's are sucking an extra house pay a month out of people around here that are trying to hold on to their homes.
Not trying to sound contrary but concerns are regional like everything else in our business. The main reason I'm interested in value added to a home around here is to try to find enough equity for people to finance the systems. Houses are worth 40 to 60% of what they were 2 years ago so equity loans are hard to come by and 15 to 25K systems exceed most common folks savings. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac may have used NPV's around here but we can't. We're down to dollars and sense (not a typo).
Again not trying to sound snippy, but the thread was "Don't Wait". I say that because I don't think my neighbors can afford to.
J


Joe Hardin
www.amicontracting.com
We Dig Comfort!
www.doityourselfgeothermal.com
Dig Your Own Comfort!
183eejUser is Offline
Basic Member
Basic Member
Send Private Message
Posts:127

--
21 Sep 2008 10:48 PM
Posted By joe.ami on 09/21/2008 10:11 PM
Again, I can only speak to a heating dominated climate, but 5 year paybacks are conservative against fuel oil or LP and that is not calculating in equipment replacement which is often due within 5 years and always due within life span of new equipment.
NPV's are way more useful in areas where folks buy "it" because they can afford to. Joe, the NPV approach applies to rich and poor people alike.  A geothermal purchase is either a good deal or it isn't.  It doesn't matter if it's paid for up front by rich people or on the installment plan like I did.  The beauty of geothermal is that, even with borrowed money, it is a good deal because you effectively neutralize energy inflation for 20 years with an ultra high efficient system.  In my case, I borrowed all the money for my geo system and after paying the extra mortgage amount each month, I'm pocketing an extra $100 a month from the savings on my electric bill. In my area people with modest means and perhaps no investment strategy are buying geo because they can't afford not to. Fossil's are sucking an extra house pay a month out of people around here that are trying to hold on to their homes. 

Not trying to sound contrary but concerns are regional like everything else in our business. The main reason I'm interested in value added to a home around here is to try to find enough equity for people to finance the systems. Houses are worth 40 to 60% of what they were 2 years ago so equity loans are hard to come by and 15 to 25K systems exceed most common folks savings. Most people have to finance something like geothermal so it is not restricted to your area.  You may be aware of this already but the Electric & Gas Industries Association has teamed up with GE Capital to provide financing for geothermal system installs.  It's unsecured debt, no lien, no equity required in the home, up to $50K loans, up to 20 year terms, and staged funding so the dealer can cash flow the business.  Here's the link if you haven't heard of it http://www.egia.com/DesktopDefault.aspx?VendorID=57&TabID=506 Don't think you're fightin this war alone buddy.  There are alot of folks on your side.  Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac may have used NPV's around here but we can't. We're down to dollars and sense (not a typo).
Again not trying to sound snippy, but the thread was "Don't Wait". I say that because I don't think my neighbors can afford to.  
J




Dale Walker<br>EarthTap<br>www.earthtapenergy.com<br>Where the sun never sets on energy savings<br>
BrockUser is Offline
Advanced Member
Advanced Member
Send Private Message
Posts:599
Avatar

--
22 Sep 2008 12:27 AM
I should be clearer. For family and friends I know when I have done geo vs existing natural gas with a 10 year old 85% gas furnace the payback tends to be further then 5 years. With a 25 year old propane or fuel oil furnace switching to geo is a no brainier and I agree that payback can be really quick in those cases. The lowest I had calculated was just over three years.

In the end I agree that geo is the way to go, I only wish I had gone this route sooner. Our last property was shale and we were on a 75 foot by 200 foot lot that sloped at about 20%. The estimate we got for geo in the late 90's was about 60K over their traditional system so we just could go that route at the time. In this house it was $20k over the traditional system so we bit and I am glad we did.

I am actually in the process of getting our local geo company a bid for my sister in laws; by my estimation their payback was about 6 years out.


Green Bay, WI. - 4 ton horizontal goethermal, 16k gallon indoor pool, 3kw solar PV setup, 2 ton air to air HP, 3400 sq ft
Bruce FreyUser is Offline
Basic Member
Basic Member
Send Private Message
Posts:429

--
22 Sep 2008 03:16 AM
I chatted a bit with one of my smart colleagues this morning and he suggested that for the comparison of two systems like this, a better approach would be to show initial payment and future utility/loan/tax PAYMENTS, not savings.

In this way the NPV will identify the "least bad" solution and will not give people the impression that you are printing money in the basement.

If it is done with a computer, it must be right, right? ;-)

Bruce


senecarrUser is Offline
Basic Member
Basic Member
Send Private Message
Posts:211

--
22 Sep 2008 10:44 AM
Posted By vhehn on 09/21/2008 9:36 AM
nonsense. i live in south dakota. it doesnt get much colder than that.
there is no need for propane backup. the electric strips will do fine.
sure they will kick on often at 0 or less but it doesnt stay that cold very long.
my hvac bills average about 50 per month. how long will it take to roe an 80k
geo investment saving half of 50 per month?


Unfortunately, if she's getting a bid for 80K for geo, a properly specked air source heat pump(s) should cost at least 20 or 40K. I'm guessing with the farm house element, at least part of that expense would the need for new duct installs. Air source would require those as well. From what I've seen of air source heat pumps, you're looking at a COP of more like 2, and that's for a fairly sophisticated one.


senecarrUser is Offline
Basic Member
Basic Member
Send Private Message
Posts:211

--
22 Sep 2008 11:03 AM
I know in my case, I couldn't even really compare to natural gas. I don't have a line at the house, and from I heard from someone when I was looking at homes, it might cost as much $30,000 to bring the line through. Why the heck would I pay more for a system that costs more to run, even assuming it's available?
I did have the problem that the propane furnace at the house I bought was 92% AFUE, but that still has the problem that the propane that runs it costs per at 100% efficiency than simply using electric heater at 100% efficiency with seasonal heating rate.


BrockUser is Offline
Advanced Member
Advanced Member
Send Private Message
Posts:599
Avatar

--
23 Sep 2008 12:46 AM
It's funny though, what’s the payback on a traditional A/C unit? What’s the payback on a similar replacement furnace? I know geo has a higher initial cost but this always get me.


Green Bay, WI. - 4 ton horizontal goethermal, 16k gallon indoor pool, 3kw solar PV setup, 2 ton air to air HP, 3400 sq ft
Palace GeothermalUser is Offline
Veteran Member
Veteran Member
Send Private Message
Posts:1609

--
23 Sep 2008 12:50 AM
Posted By Brock on 09/23/2008 12:46 AM
It's funny though, what’s the payback on a traditional A/C unit? What’s the payback on a similar replacement furnace? I know geo has a higher initial cost but this always get me.

Great point !!! 

On a new install all you need to worry about paying back is the extra $$  you paid above what a conventional system would have cost.


Dewayne Dean

<br>www.PalaceGeothermal.com<br>Why settle for 90% when you can have 400%<br>We heat and cool with dirt!<br>visit- http://welserver.com/WEL0114/- to see my system
TechGromitUser is Offline
Advanced Member
Advanced Member
Send Private Message
Posts:634

--
23 Sep 2008 11:02 PM

Take this for what it's worth but the Appraisal Institute says that for every dollar saved in a homes operating cost increases the home's value by $20.  If this approach has merit, and I don't know for a fact that it does, it would mean a $100 a month in savings would translate into a $24K increase in the home's value.  Given today's energy cost issues and projected increases down the road, I suspect the idea has merit.  I would think the unanswered question is by how much.


One would think this would be true, but I don't know how much impact this really has in the real estate market as of yet. My next door neighbor is selling his house for 800k, Twice what I paid for mine, sure it's a nicer house (but smaller then mine), or a bigger piece of property, but it's heated in propane. Honestly I can't see him getting his price, even if he had Geo. I'm not sure how many buyers stop to consider the different operational costs of owning a house for various systems... at least not yet. I'm sure it will begin to become more and more important in the future. 

 


TechGromitUser is Offline
Advanced Member
Advanced Member
Send Private Message
Posts:634

--
23 Sep 2008 11:15 PM
Posted By conniepangan on 09/18/2008 2:09 PM
I researched that air source heat pump doesn't work in the extreme cold climate like Northeast. I would definitely go towards this if it's feasible.

I have one, I'm from New jersey, Atlantic County to be more specific. The unit works perfectly fine, for around $3,500 (at least for my house) you can purchase a do it yourself Goodman kit. But there are no where as effiecent as a Water source Geothermal unit. They fall somewhere between propane and oil/gas in efficency. They generally last around 10 years before the outside compressor needs to be replaced, mine in 8 years old.

What do I think about it? I hate it, i think it's 1/2 my electric bill in the winter, I have two zones, a geothermal system for the first floor and a heat pump for the second floor. But it does work perfectly fine, even in the "Extreme cold notheast climate". newer heatpump models are pushing the up effeiency of the units, but there's a bigger price tag to go along with the unit, better just to stick with geothermal if you can afford it. Any cost/benefit analyst needs to take into account that One Geothermal unit can out live three Air Source heatpumps. 

 


joe.amiUser is Offline
Veteran Member
Veteran Member
Send Private Message
Posts:4377
Avatar

--
23 Sep 2008 11:27 PM
Excellent point on ASHP lifespan TG.
Sure hope it goes well for the manufacturers with R-410 systems and 10 year warranties.
Not sure if people shopping for $800K homes look too closely at energy bills, but people in 150K homes in my area sure are. Seneca is an example of someone who's plans included geo so that he could afford to live in his new home.
Meanwhile a fellow I mentioned on another thread skipped geo because it would have made the generator to large for his 13K sf estate. He didn't care much about the gas bill, in fact when we talked about going open loop as he needed (if I recall) 20 ish tons of excavation, he said no, since having a pond would cost 100K by the time he landscaped it in to his specs (can't have a pond without a boat house, ya know)!
J


Joe Hardin
www.amicontracting.com
We Dig Comfort!
www.doityourselfgeothermal.com
Dig Your Own Comfort!
robinncUser is Offline
Advanced Member
Advanced Member
Send Private Message
Posts:586

--
24 Sep 2008 12:52 AM
Joe......I think you meant.....ya can't have a boat house without a pond........:)
Yea....I think most folks that are buying houses 800 grand and up could care less about cost of heating/cooling! IMO....I think there needs to be more competion in the business of geo to help bring it more in line with tradition!


183eejUser is Offline
Basic Member
Basic Member
Send Private Message
Posts:127

--
24 Sep 2008 07:28 AM
Posted By joe.ami on 09/23/2008 11:27 PM
Excellent point on ASHP lifespan TG.
Sure hope it goes well for the manufacturers with R-410 systems and 10 year warranties.
Not sure if people shopping for $800K homes look too closely at energy bills, but people in 150K homes in my area sure are. Seneca is an example of someone who's plans included geo so that he could afford to live in his new home.
Meanwhile a fellow I mentioned on another thread skipped geo because it would have made the generator to large for his 13K sf estate. He didn't care much about the gas bill, in fact when we talked about going open loop as he needed (if I recall) 20 ish tons of excavation, he said no, since having a pond would cost 100K by the time he landscaped it in to his specs (can't have a pond without a boat house, ya know)!
J
Folks who can afford an $800K home probably have payment for their electric bill automatically drafted from their account so it's not likely they even see the bill.  Typically, they are motivated to buy the best and that is important to recognize.  Even in down times, rich people will spend money when everyone else is worried about making the next mortgage payment.  Positioning your brand so that it is seen by this group as the "Lexus" of the heating and cooling systems is pretty big.  Everything about geothermal clearly points to superior engineering and performance.  Properly positioned, people with money are always in the market for good quality.  And bad installs can do so much to tarnish geothermal's perception of quality.



Dale Walker<br>EarthTap<br>www.earthtapenergy.com<br>Where the sun never sets on energy savings<br>
conniepanganUser is Offline
Basic Member
Basic Member
Send Private Message
Posts:112

--
24 Sep 2008 09:51 AM
Posted By TechGromit on 09/23/2008 11:15 PM
Posted By conniepangan on 09/18/2008 2:09 PM
I researched that air source heat pump doesn't work in the extreme cold climate like Northeast. I would definitely go towards this if it's feasible.

I have one, I'm from New jersey, Atlantic County to be more specific. The unit works perfectly fine, for around $3,500 (at least for my house) you can purchase a do it yourself Goodman kit. But there are no where as effiecent as a Water source Geothermal unit. They fall somewhere between propane and oil/gas in efficency. They generally last around 10 years before the outside compressor needs to be replaced, mine in 8 years old.

What do I think about it? I hate it, i think it's 1/2 my electric bill in the winter, I have two zones, a geothermal system for the first floor and a heat pump for the second floor. But it does work perfectly fine, even in the "Extreme cold notheast climate". newer heatpump models are pushing the up effeiency of the units, but there's a bigger price tag to go along with the unit, better just to stick with geothermal if you can afford it. Any cost/benefit analyst needs to take into account that One Geothermal unit can out live three Air Source heatpumps. 

 

Enough said! Thanks TechGromit! Now I am more convinced this is the best route to go. It's not easy to decide because of the cost but again the benefits weighs more than the cost. One Geothermal can out live 3 Air source heat pump...wow! then I don't have to worry when I'm old and gray! :-)

Think about buying a very expensive car (30K for my geo) but will last me 30 years + benefits without depreciation! that's awesome!


Palace GeothermalUser is Offline
Veteran Member
Veteran Member
Send Private Message
Posts:1609

--
24 Sep 2008 09:53 AM
Posted By robinnc on 09/24/2008 12:52 AM
...I think there needs to be more competion in the business of geo to help bring it more in line with tradition!

Sorry ... but this will never happen. 

The cost of installing a ground loop  ( vertical or horizontal ) will never be any less.

The cost of making heat pumps is never going to go down.

You might find some installers who will charge less for labor,  but labor is by far the smallest piece of the geo pie.


Dewayne Dean

<br>www.PalaceGeothermal.com<br>Why settle for 90% when you can have 400%<br>We heat and cool with dirt!<br>visit- http://welserver.com/WEL0114/- to see my system
senecarrUser is Offline
Basic Member
Basic Member
Send Private Message
Posts:211

--
24 Sep 2008 10:12 AM
Posted By geodean on 09/24/2008 9:53 AM
Posted By robinnc on 09/24/2008 12:52 AM
...I think there needs to be more competion in the business of geo to help bring it more in line with tradition!
[/quote]
Sorry ... but this will never happen. 

The cost of installing a ground loop  ( vertical or horizontal ) will never be any less.

The cost of making heat pumps is never going to go down.

You might find some installers who will charge less for labor,  but labor is by far the smallest piece of the geo pie.


Never go down from competition, probably not. Go down from technology? Probably. I'm inclined to think the units will stay close to their cost but go up in efficiency. As for the loop, I think there's still room for improvements in cost. I seem to recall someone mentioning a bore digging machine that just has a power / pull back line. If enough people start installing geo, someone out there will think of a way to dig a cheaper hole - possibly some kind of roomba of drilling / excavating :). I'm also inclined to think the technology will change, which might change the amount of loop needed. If I was in the heat pump biz, I'd keep my eye out for advances in magnetic heat pumps.


cnygeoUser is Offline
Basic Member
Basic Member
Send Private Message
Posts:170

--
24 Sep 2008 11:24 AM
Posted By geodean on 09/24/2008 9:53 AM
Posted By robinnc on 09/24/2008 12:52 AM
...I think there needs to be more competion in the business of geo to help bring it more in line with tradition!
[/quote]
Sorry ... but this will never happen. 

The cost of installing a ground loop  ( vertical or horizontal ) will never be any less.

The cost of making heat pumps is never going to go down.

You might find some installers who will charge less for labor,  but labor is by far the smallest piece of the geo pie.



I have to respectfully disagree here. When I look at a typical gshp, particularly a water-water unit, I see ample room to reduce cost. I don't know all the factors in play, but I assume it's due to some combination of low volumes, relatively high marketing and development costs, and a relative lack of competition. With a few exceptions, the heat pumps I've seen are not highly engineered and optimized units and are not well designed for volume manufacturing. On the loop side, I agree that the traditional ways of installing loops are pretty well fixed in cost, but I could definitely see innovations in installation methods or configuration that would drive cost down. This might be a very regional thing due to specific ground conditions, loads, labor costs, etc.

Of course inflation might negate any cost reductions entirely! I saw an interesting paper on reducing the cost of geo systems that's fairly old but still applicable in many ways. I'll try to locate it and post it here.


You are not authorized to post a reply.
Page 3 of 5 << < 12345 > >>


Active Forums 4.1
Membership Membership: Latest New User Latest: croccohvacusa New Today New Today: 0 New Yesterday New Yesterday: 0 User Count Overall: 35027
People Online People Online: Visitors Visitors: 549 Members Members: 0 Total Total: 549
Copyright 2011 by BuildCentral, Inc.   Terms Of Use  Privacy Statement