Posted By heatoftheearth on 12 Jun 2010 10:48 AM
Looby, I have used that spreadsheet for all my climatemaster installs,
about 15 and counting. It has been dead on every time, verified with
a flow meter.
I saw what you mean about the AF correction factor. Didnt seem right
to me either ....
When a program's output "doesn't seem right," I want to know why.
Every source I've seen, including CM's Flow Center Installation Guide,
shows significant increases in dynamic head (compared to water) for
methanol and ethanol. There's nothing "company specific" involved
here -- it's jus' plain physics -- and the 1%-3% AF correction factors
displayed by that spreadsheet are jus' plain wrong.
Maybe the script "fixes up" the final results by applying an opaque
"base pumping penalty" or some other invisible skullduggery -- but
I've been flogging bits for enough years to distrust the final output
when the intermediate results are certifiable nonsense.
Again, I dont think the recommended flow rate for the 026 are 7 and 8 gpm.
IMO its is 6gpm.
I concede, you are correct. I don't know why the Tranquility27 spec
sheet lists 7 and 8 GPM for the TT026 since they're inconsistent
with other CM recommendations (in the case of the TT026, only):
http://www.climatemaster.com/downloads/97B0015N01.pdf
"Loop Circuiting - Loops should be designed with a compromise
between pressure drop and turbulent flow (Reynold’s Number) in
the heat exchange pipe for heat transfer. Therefore the following
rules should be observed when designing a loop:
• 3 gpm per ton flow rate (2.25 gpm per ton minimum). In larger
systems 2.5 to 2.7 gpm per ton is adequate in most cases.
Selecting pumps to attain exactly 3 gpm per ton is generally
not cost effective from an operating cost standpoint."