Time to Upgrade HVAC
Last Post 26 Aug 2010 04:03 PM by help-me-conserve. 21 Replies.
Printer Friendly
Sort:
PrevPrev NextNext
You are not authorized to post a reply.
Page 1 of 212 > >>
Author Messages
help-me-conserveUser is Offline
New Member
New Member
Send Private Message
Posts:17

--
22 Aug 2010 07:18 PM

Hello to all,
It is time to get rid of my 5 ton, seer 8 heat pump and replace it.
The house and the heat pump is almost 14 years old.
I live in the Denton Texas (DFW) area so it gets HOT in summer (heat index around 100 -110 from mid July to mid Sept). 
I have a two story home with standard 8 foot ceiling, somewhere around 3500 sq ft. Around 1500 down and 2000 up. (All of the full bathrooms are upstairs (humidity concerns)).

Winter although short can get as low as 18 degrees (overnight lows). Typical nights in Dec-Jan-Feb are in the high twenties to mid thirties so not too bad.
About 4 months of the year is mild and we only heat or cool occasionally.
The mild months we can have electric bills as low as $60.00.
When we get our cold snap in Jan we have to have the heat pump run continuously. It will run day and night for like 4 days and increases the monthly bill up to $330 for Jan.
Some summer bills can get around $300.
I had the current unit checked out a few years ago and it had plenty of refrigerant and I was told it was in good order but was not an efficient unit.

The home was built almost 14 years ago and we have always had cooling and heating challenges.
In the summer we have to close most of the downstairs vents (keeping the upstairs ones wide open) to keep the upstairs cool in summer.
We do the reverse in winter. Close the upstairs vents (leaving them slightly cracked) and open the downstairs fully to keep it warm.
I also added a small window unit upstairs (8000 btu, seer 10.8) and it has reduced my bill by $100 a month and made the upstairs so much more comfortable.
It paid for itself in and then some in one summer. I also added heat reflecting window tint that has also reduced temperatures in east and west facing rooms. Big help.

I have a plan that I am sure will need some scope changes.

Step 1. upgrade from a single 5 ton unit to two 3 ton units.
I have a fake wall next to my air handler that was put there for an extra air handler so I have the inside room.
I am thinking two 3 tons for the following reasons.
The current 5 ton cannot keep up in winter. It runs day and night and we freeze eventhough we are bundled up.
However it does a good job the rest of the year (providing we have half of the vents in the house shut).
I currently have 700 sq ft per ton and it does not do the job.  
This is a 3500 sq ft house with standard 8 foot ceilings. If I go with 600 sq per ton I will need (3500 / 600 = 5.8) or 6 tons.
I have been told that I may have to go with 500 sq ft per ton. Would 500 be overkill?

I have to add that the downstairs stays cool in summer due to the cold air sinking and the upstairs stays warmer due to the heat rising.
So I think I definitely need to stay with 3 ton units. Extra cooling for upstairs in summer (mostly hot in Texas).
3 ton down, for extra heating in winter and the excess will rise anyway.
Plus I plan to vent the returns so that the upstairs pulls from downstairs and downstairs pulls its air from upstairs. and of course I will split out the downstairs from the upstairs into two separate manifolds.

My question Any major or minor problems with step 1? any holes? Did I overlook something?


Step 2.

Do I go with a heat pump for upstairs and a heat pump with natural gas (dual fuel) for the downstairs?
The natural gas line runs down the middle of my attic and it is 1'' diameter. It goes to a fireplace with a log lighter that we almost never use. Or do I go with a GSHP?

I spoke to one guy who wanted $60k just to drill the wells? He wanted to punch five or six 200' holes in the backyard. $60k, no way.  Not in my budget.  

I know how to trench, so I can trench around the house and put in 1'' coil tubing. I am figuring on trenching 430 linear feet to a depth of 6 feet and about a foot wide.
The 1'' spiral tubing should be around1900 feet in length all curled up.
Each curl will be spaced a few inches apart (or does it have to be spaced)?
There is roughly .785375 sq inch per 1 inch tubing (1" I.D.) or is that cubic inches?
100 feet or 1200 inches of one inch (I.D.) tubing has an area (I hope that I am saying this right) of 943 cubic inches.
I am told that a gallon of water has roughly 231 cubic inches.
So 1200 inches of 1'' tubing should hold around 4 gallons of water. Pi * (1/2)^2 = .785375

If I have 1900 linear feet of tubing or 22,800 inches it should be able to hold 76 gallons of fluid.
if my calculations are off (and they very well could be, I was not a math major), wrong, incorrect, way out in left field, not even close please let me know what they should be?

thanks,

But if they are correct, would this be enough fluid to run two 3 ton units?


Step 3.
 
Closed Loop.
Once the length of tubing is verified Is it better to be in a continuous loop of 1900 linear feet?
or would I be better in splitting the 1900 into 3 separate loops?

The 1900 continuous loop seems like it would really have a better chance of normalizing temperatures but then I am having to deal with pressures and pump sizes.
If I use 3 loops will I need 3 pumps? That's 3 electric motors. Will that drive up costs?

Is it better to use 3 loops because it will reduce pressure?

I feel that most of the year I will either be using the upstairs or the downstairs. ONLY in extreme temperatures will I be using both the upstairs and downstairs but of course I want to design the system to run as if both were running.

Can both GSHP use the same common loop?
It would seem that they could as long as the flow rate is there?
Are there different stage pumps that could increase flow as needed?
are there probes that monitor the temp of the fluid going back out into the system buried in the yard as opposed to the fluid that is returning?
Is it possible to use an additional tank so that the amount of fluid in the system is greater?
I would set it up like a power steering pump on a car so that the normalized fluid comes in the top and goes out the bottom into the GSHP and then back out into the yard (but only if needed)?

I think that is enough questions for now.

Thanks

AltonUser is Offline
Veteran Member
Veteran Member
Send Private Message
Posts:2164

--
22 Aug 2010 08:23 PM

Does the attic need more insulation before doing a manual J calculation?  I did not see anything in your posting about any steps that may be possible to reduce the HVAC load.  I am no expert on HVAC but I think it would be less costly to reduce the load instead of buying bigger equipment.  I know in some cases adding insulation is not possible.  Do you plan to use the existing ducts?  If so, have they been checked for leaks?

Residential Designer &
Construction Technology Consultant -- E-mail: Alton at Auburn dot Edu Use email format with @ and period .
334 826-3979
geomeUser is Offline
Advanced Member
Advanced Member
Send Private Message
Posts:987

--
22 Aug 2010 08:49 PM
Posted By help-me-conserve on 22 Aug 2010 07:18 PM

I feel that most of the year I will either be using the upstairs or the downstairs. ONLY in extreme temperatures will I be using both the upstairs and downstairs but of course I want to design the system to run as if both were running.

Can both GSHP use the same common loop?
It would seem that they could as long as the flow rate is there?

We have separate geothermal units for our first and second floor with one common loop that is sized for both units running simultaneously.  When only one geo unit runs, you get the advantage of the larger overall loop.  Our two loop pumps are common to both units (both 245 watt pumps run when there is a call from either, or both geothermal units), but from what I understand you can have dedicated pumps for each geo unit.

Also, if you have 2 geothermal units you can get 2 desuperheaters (hot water assist) and have them both plumbed to your buffer tank/water heater.
Homeowner with WF Envision NDV038 (packaged) & NDZ026 (split), one 3000' 4 pipe closed horizontal ground loop, Prestige thermostats, desuperheaters, 85 gal. Marathon.
joe.amiUser is Offline
Veteran Member
Veteran Member
Send Private Message
Posts:4377
Avatar

--
22 Aug 2010 09:38 PM
I confess my eyes glazed over part way through your post, but was a manual J load anywhere in there?
Observations:
Not necessarily bad if a heat pump runs almost full time but still reaches set point.
(noticed recently TX still has some heating dominated areas)
Was there an instance when set point wasn't achieved (summer or winter)? Or is your concern disparity between up and down temps? This is usually aduct problem that can be leveled of considerably by ECM blower.
Unlikely you have a 14 year old 8 SEER unit. 10 SEER was minimum in '92.
Joe
Joe Hardin
www.amicontracting.com
We Dig Comfort!
www.doityourselfgeothermal.com
Dig Your Own Comfort!
engineerUser is Offline
Veteran Member
Veteran Member
Send Private Message
Posts:2749

--
23 Aug 2010 02:40 AM
I had the same eye-glaze issue and similar desire to see a Manual J, preferably room-by-room, summer and winter.

I wouldn't be suprised at a SEER-10 unit making SEER 8 performance given age and poor ducts.

single 1900' closed loop is unlikely to be optimal design. Multiple shorter loops can be served by one pump. A proper loop design will identify reasonable options and expected temps and efficiencies.

Of utmost importance will be contracting with an experienced, honorable local installer.

A Manual J calc may identify low hanging fruit - home improvements that will reduce load at low cost, reducing size of system needed, cost to install and cost to operate.

I can't say enough in support of a careful load calculation.
Curt Kinder <br><br>

The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is - Winston Churchill <br><br><a href="http://www.greenersolutionsair.com">www.greenersolutionsair.com</a>
help-me-conserveUser is Offline
New Member
New Member
Send Private Message
Posts:17

--
23 Aug 2010 09:23 AM

Thanks for your replies.

I do plan to add some more insulation in the attic.    I have between 8 to 11 inches of the blown-in pink stuff and all of the baffels look clear so I have airflow.

I have added whirly bird vents and started a radiant barrier system using aluminum foil.

It looks like I need to get a Manual J done as my next step.

So a continuous 1900 foot loop using 1'' line is not a good idea?  So I should split that in two if I am using two 3 ton units?


help-me-conserveUser is Offline
New Member
New Member
Send Private Message
Posts:17

--
23 Aug 2010 09:25 AM
The house was built in 1997 most likely with inventory left over from 1996, so it might be seer 8 when it was new.  The ducts seem fine as when I inspected them in the attic so I do plan to reuse them.
joe.amiUser is Offline
Veteran Member
Veteran Member
Send Private Message
Posts:4377
Avatar

--
23 Aug 2010 09:31 AM
No profit in discussing design without first establishing requirements.
j
Joe Hardin
www.amicontracting.com
We Dig Comfort!
www.doityourselfgeothermal.com
Dig Your Own Comfort!
jonrUser is Offline
Senior Member
Senior Member
Send Private Message
Posts:5341

--
23 Aug 2010 10:02 AM
If the major problem is that your current heat pump doesn't keep up in the winter, then some nat gas or electric aux heat might be your most cost effective solution.

LoobyUser is Offline
Basic Member
Basic Member
Send Private Message
Posts:401
Avatar

--
23 Aug 2010 11:16 PM
Posted By help-me-conserve on 23 Aug 2010 09:23 AM
So a continuous 1900 foot loop using 1'' line is not a good idea?
Probably not. But it's impossible to suggest a "better" idea without a Manual-J
estimate of your heating/cooling loads -- plus an experienced loop installer's
knowledge of your local geology. Without those inputs, you don't know what
total length of pipe is needed or how many GPMs are required.

One measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions.
Texas CoolerUser is Offline
New Member
New Member
Send Private Message
Posts:22

--
24 Aug 2010 05:01 PM
I'm just north of Denton with with lots of TX HVAC experience. Your situation with hot/cool is common without zoning and RNC contractor ductwork. Most of the ductwork I see is the R2 flex that is not installed correctly and improperly designed and poorly sealed. Unless you have a lot of land and deep soil to rock, vertical is the best way for geo in our area. Also, package unit retro-fits are difficult when there is no basement to bring the heat exchange lines in below the surface although anything is possible with enough $$$. It is possible to have a geo split outdoors and with only the air handler upstairs. If your bills are only $300/month during the worst times of the year, the ROI for two geo systems would be hard to justify. The first step should be a heat load analysis to determine exactly HOW MUCH heat/air you need. The analysis should also detail how much airflow is needed for heating/cooling in each room. While doing this the technician can also measure the static pressure of the system which can help determine how well it is performing with your current air handler. When this is all computed, you may see that the ductwork installed will not perform regardless of what kind of system you have and may need to be replaced if you expect to receive the efficiency claimed. Lastly, a geo heat exchanger loop system needs to be correctly installed and designed for the installed equipment and site. For the 2 ton geo system I am installing in my workshop office using horizontal trenching, I have to install 1150' for EACH ton buried 7'deep. Additionally, I'm installing a drip sprinkler below the surface just in case we go thru another drought. I'm going horizontal vs. vertical because I have a backhoe, dozer and truck , the available land and it will be cheaper for me to install. I also want to prove to myself that a properly designed and installed horizontal will work every bit as well as the vertical bores.
help-me-conserveUser is Offline
New Member
New Member
Send Private Message
Posts:17

--
24 Aug 2010 06:00 PM
That is great to know that you are in the area and that you have experience.
I was not really planning to spend $$$. I am trying to look for an economical solution. As I mentioned before one HVAC contractor wanted to charge me around $65k to put in the vertical plus everything else would have been around 100k or so. He must of had me confused for "Bill Gates" or "Jerry Jones". Anyway, I feel that I can do most of the labor to help keep costs down. since I have the R2 flex how can I find out if it was installed correctly? I have around 17 drops in the entire house. I have a closet upstaris with one air handler with room for another and of course a 5 ton American Standard heat pump downstairs. Of course the thermostat is downstairs and I replaced it recently and it was only a 4 wire. Which signifies that it is a certain style of heatpump. I do not think that it has any aux heat.

btw,
another guy wanted to rip out all of my downstairs celings so that he could put several returns and wanted to put returns in each room. Not want I had in mind. If you stand by a closed door you can feel the air leaving the room from under the door and returning. When the system is running and if I go up in the attic and follow the duct work I can not hear any blowing or whistling or see any air being moved around. If you stand by a vent with the all of the vents wide open you can feel a lot of air moving but it is best to have the duct work checked and a manual J done.

any ideas what the manual J would cost me?
duct work check?
help-me-conserveUser is Offline
New Member
New Member
Send Private Message
Posts:17

--
24 Aug 2010 06:11 PM
I have heard where somone used copper tubing because copper is 19 times better for therm transfer rate. After doing a pressure test they filled the trench with grout to keep it from being crushed and then refilled the trench.
has anyone else heard of this?
engineerUser is Offline
Veteran Member
Veteran Member
Send Private Message
Posts:2749

--
24 Aug 2010 11:39 PM
Posted By Texas Cooler on 24 Aug 2010 05:01 PM
I'm just north of Denton with with lots of TX HVAC experience. Your situation with hot/cool is common without zoning and RNC contractor ductwork. Most of the ductwork I see is the R2 flex that is not installed correctly and improperly designed and poorly sealed. Unless you have a lot of land and deep soil to rock, vertical is the best way for geo in our area. Also, package unit retro-fits are difficult when there is no basement to bring the heat exchange lines in below the surface although anything is possible with enough $$$. It is possible to have a geo split outdoors and with only the air handler upstairs. If your bills are only $300/month during the worst times of the year, the ROI for two geo systems would be hard to justify. The first step should be a heat load analysis to determine exactly HOW MUCH heat/air you need. The analysis should also detail how much airflow is needed for heating/cooling in each room. While doing this the technician can also measure the static pressure of the system which can help determine how well it is performing with your current air handler. When this is all computed, you may see that the ductwork installed will not perform regardless of what kind of system you have and may need to be replaced if you expect to receive the efficiency claimed. Lastly, a geo heat exchanger loop system needs to be correctly installed and designed for the installed equipment and site. For the 2 ton geo system I am installing in my workshop office using horizontal trenching, I have to install 1150' for EACH ton buried 7'deep. Additionally, I'm installing a drip sprinkler below the surface just in case we go thru another drought. I'm going horizontal vs. vertical because I have a backhoe, dozer and truck , the available land and it will be cheaper for me to install. I also want to prove to myself that a properly designed and installed horizontal will work every bit as well as the vertical bores.
Spot on, especially for post number one.

Well done, full marks, welcome aboard.

Keep us advised as your project unfolds.

Curt Kinder <br><br>

The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is - Winston Churchill <br><br><a href="http://www.greenersolutionsair.com">www.greenersolutionsair.com</a>
engineerUser is Offline
Veteran Member
Veteran Member
Send Private Message
Posts:2749

--
24 Aug 2010 11:43 PM
Posted By help-me-conserve on 24 Aug 2010 06:11 PM
I have heard where somone used copper tubing because copper is 19 times better for therm transfer rate. After doing a pressure test they filled the trench with grout to keep it from being crushed and then refilled the trench.
has anyone else heard of this?

Selecting Copper for its 19x heat transfer rate is a bit like specifying that you will only buy a car capable of 250 mph and then using it on US public highways.

In other words, the copper can superbly conduct all the heat you extract or reject into whatever grout or backfill you choose, and run smack into a heat transfer 'speed limit' of 55 mph imposed by the much lower conductivity of the immediately surrounding material.
Curt Kinder <br><br>

The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is - Winston Churchill <br><br><a href="http://www.greenersolutionsair.com">www.greenersolutionsair.com</a>
LoobyUser is Offline
Basic Member
Basic Member
Send Private Message
Posts:401
Avatar

--
25 Aug 2010 12:08 AM
Posted By help-me-conserve on 24 Aug 2010 06:11 PM
I have heard where somone used copper tubing because copper is 19 times better ...
Silver is even better than copper...

...or gold, or platinum,

Looby

One measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions.
tinoueUser is Offline
New Member
New Member
Send Private Message
Posts:96

--
25 Aug 2010 07:54 AM
Posted By engineer on 24 Aug 2010 11:43 PM
Posted By help-me-conserve on 24 Aug 2010 06:11 PM
I have heard where somone used copper tubing because copper is 19 times better for therm transfer rate. After doing a pressure test they filled the trench with grout to keep it from being crushed and then refilled the trench.
has anyone else heard of this?

Selecting Copper for its 19x heat transfer rate is a bit like specifying that you will only buy a car capable of 250 mph and then using it on US public highways.

In other words, the copper can superbly conduct all the heat you extract or reject into whatever grout or backfill you choose, and run smack into a heat transfer 'speed limit' of 55 mph imposed by the much lower conductivity of the immediately surrounding material.


I struggle with this. Having a DX system myself, I appreciate that it uses direct burial of copper for the fastest energy transfer. At the same time, I think many people forget that there's multiple factors, and heat transfer rate is just one. Ground heat capacity is also very important. The trap I've seen some get themselves into is saying "copper has such great conductivity, we don't need as much ground loop!", so they use shallower wells or shorter trenches. The system then happily sucks the heat out of the ground faster than it can be replenished, resulting in poor system performance.

Using plastic ground loops keeps installers honest, to some degree. Because the transfer rate is lower, they have to use more loop, which is actually good because it forces greater ground capacity, reducing that as a limiting factor, helping to ensure long term performance.
Texas CoolerUser is Offline
New Member
New Member
Send Private Message
Posts:22

--
25 Aug 2010 09:29 AM
Posted By engineer on 24 Aug 2010 11:39 PM
Spot on, especially for post number one.

Well done, full marks, welcome aboard.

Keep us advised as your project unfolds.


Appreciate the compliments.  I just recently added geo (ClimateMaster) to our lineup to compliment our AmStd and Lennox brands.  We don't advertise and generally only work from referrals on projects that require strict adherance to quality and performance.  (no tract RNC work)


I'll post some photos of the progress as my project unfolds.  Right now with the 100+ degree heat, we are out every day until the third week of September installing 15-20 SEER replacement systems to help folks beat the high electric bills.  I hope by next year to convert some of those sales into geothermal.


What I see as a real dis-service to the geo industry is selling complete "kits" for geothermal on the internet.  None of the loop kits would satisfy my heat transfer requirements.  No load calc, no knowledge of soil conductivity and probably no flush cart.  As a long time lurker, reading about some of the install/service practices by "install companies" as described by some of the posters on here make me cringe... 


Dana1User is Offline
Senior Member
Senior Member
Send Private Message
Posts:6991

--
25 Aug 2010 11:28 AM
Posted By help-me-conserve on 23 Aug 2010 09:23 AM

Thanks for your replies.

I do plan to add some more insulation in the attic.    I have between 8 to 11 inches of the blown-in pink stuff and all of the baffels look clear so I have airflow.

I have added whirly bird vents and started a radiant barrier system using aluminum foil.

It looks like I need to get a Manual J done as my next step.

So a continuous 1900 foot loop using 1'' line is not a good idea?  So I should split that in two if I am using two 3 ton units?



Unless your attic floor/upper floor ceiling is truly air-tight, those whirlybird vents are more likely to be INCREASING your cooling & heating loads than reducing them.  Air-sealing between conditioned space and attic is critical, since a hot attic creates a HUGE "stack effect", driving overall air infiltration. The whirlybirds may make the attic cooler, but at least half of that cooling effect is likely from sucking air-conditioned air from the house up into the attic, which isn't exactly the effect you were looking for.  Vented attics don't run dramatically cooler than unvented attics- the primary benefit is to purge moisture from the attic to avoid rot conditions.  In high humidity cooling dominated climates it's self-defeating- drawing in more night-time moisture than it purges during the day.  In hot-dry climates it works. Unless your average January temperature (not the average high or low, but the average) is well under 40F you won't experience enough condensing conditions in the attic to cause damage even with the vents sealed.  When it's below 35F out the whirly birds will suck humid conditioned air into the attic RAISING it's humidity to where it might condense in the cold attic but purges it quickly when the attic temps rise above 40F (it's sort of a "solution-problem"- fixing the problem it's causing under those condtions.)  For the time being we'll assume you'll keep the vents open, but unless you air seal the attic floor and access doors VERY well, de-commissioning the whirlybirds is advisable.

Start by fixing all of the obvious air leaks, like recessed lighting cans, plumbing & electrical penetrations, etc. that you can, and pressure-door test the place to find the less-obvious leaks.  Read up on how to air-seal a place- there are many online resources.  Get familiar with spray foam, cardboard & staples, caulking guns and the like- this IS doable as a DIY, but it takes time.  If your place has a basement or crawlspace, sealing the foundation sill & rim joist (an closing off any crawlspace vents, along with putting a sealed poly vapor barrier down to keep ground gases under control if it's a crawlspace) fixes the bottom of the stack in "stack effect".  If you fix the top and the bottom of the stack you've nailed 3/4 of the infiltration drive, and things like leaky window & door weatherstripping, etc are kinda gravy. If you have a fireplace, a top-sealing damper or chimney-balloon can reduce infiltration drives related to that.  Or, you can find an insulation company that does air-sealing as a service- it's usually a far better bang for buck than mere insulation.

As for the insulation,  the radiant barrier is a good step toward getting that blown pink stuff to actually work during the cooling season, but blown at least 3" of something denser (like cellulose) will make it work better during both the cooling AND heating season.  Blown fiberglass is somewhat translucent to infra-red (radiated heat), and the hottest place in a vented attic other than the roof deck itself ends up being 1-2" BELOW the top layer of fiberglass, so you're insulating against higher-than-attic-air temp with an inch or two less of insulation.  Low density blown fiberglass also passes infiltration-air quite readily, an has high levels of convection within the fiber layer itself.  The radiant barrier blocks the radiated heat, so the temperature gradient through the fiberglass  is now at least monotonic (if not perfectly linear), but it still has significant reductions in R value at high temperature differences (more so in the heating season than in the cooling season, but it happens in both.) A 3" layer of cellulose overblow reduces those convection losses, is opaque to infra-red radiation, and adds ~ R10 to the stackup. But most-importantly, it basically stops the swings in R-value, so you get the full benefit.  If that R10 can also cover the joist-tops, it forms a thermal-break over the short-circuiting effect of the wood, further boosting real performance.  At your insulation depth the labeled-R  would likely average R30-R35, but at the extremes of temperature it's only delivering R20-ish.  With a 3" overblow of cellulose you'd be reliably above R40, all the time.

Depending on your roofing type & material you may be able to reduce peak-loading on the cooling end (and increase upper-floor comfort) with a mop-on/paint-on "cool roof"coating.  Cool-roofs work by reflecting most of the solar-spectrum light, but are highly-emmissive in the deep infra-red, so the re-radiate much of the heat that they do absorb. Most are white or light-colored, but not all, and they're not all created equal.  The aged reflectivity & emissivity numbers are key, and can be used to calculate a "solar reflectance index" (SRI) by which different products/materials can be compared from a total performance point of view. See:  http://www.coolroofs.org/index.html   (I can go into more detail if you think you'll be going this route.)  Beware- this biz is full of wannabes & hucksters with gallons of magic-mouse-milk carrying NASA labels and pictures of the space shuttle- get the real specs from the cool-roof site (and if it's not found there, pass!) There are downloadable SRI calculators available from the Lawrence Berkeley Nat'l Labs to plug the reflectance/emittance numbers into available on many product vendor websites.  An SRI over 75 is good, but over 85 is better (there are some that start out greater than 100, but aged values for reflectance tend to be lower, sometimes MUCH lower.)

In rare instances using cool-roof coatings on S or W facing walls can make a difference, but usually not enough to pay extra for.  Glazing and shading factors are typically at least an order of magnitude higher in the solar-gain equation than absorption & conduction of heat through walls.  The difference in performance between light colored or white paint vs. cool-roof coatings is usually "in the noise" of the total heat gain on exterior walls, and not usually worth paying extra for.
Dana1User is Offline
Senior Member
Senior Member
Send Private Message
Posts:6991

--
25 Aug 2010 11:38 AM
I forgot to mention- if adding more insulation is going to come close to overtopping the ventilation chutes, going with a wet-sprayed "stabilized cellulose" or a wet sprayed ultra-fine higher density fiberglass like JM Spider would be better. (Spider has similar infiltration reduction characterisics as cellulose at similar densities- that may be true of similar products like Certainteed Optima as well, but I haven't seen any data on that. Density counts though- if they can give you 1.5lbs+ density it'll perform better than the typical 1lb density in a horizontal app like this.)
You are not authorized to post a reply.
Page 1 of 212 > >>


Active Forums 4.1
Membership Membership: Latest New User Latest: croccohvacusa New Today New Today: 0 New Yesterday New Yesterday: 0 User Count Overall: 35027
People Online People Online: Visitors Visitors: 138 Members Members: 0 Total Total: 138
Copyright 2011 by BuildCentral, Inc.   Terms Of Use  Privacy Statement