Would desuperheater for extra heat exchanger inprove efficiency?
Last Post 09 Feb 2011 06:02 PM by jonr. 6 Replies.
Printer Friendly
Sort:
PrevPrev NextNext
You are not authorized to post a reply.
Author Messages
tsddawsonUser is Offline
New Member
New Member
Send Private Message
Posts:7

--
06 Feb 2011 09:20 AM
I have a 2 ton split geosystem with a desuperheater used to keep a large cotage from freezing in the winter but do not use the desuperheater since I'm not there enough to justify plumbing it into the hot water system, but I was wondering if I set the desuperheater output loop into a liquid to air exchanger would my overall efficiency be increased? The system is normally used to just keep the cottage above freezing temperatures in the winter. I think the desuperheater circuit provides an extra 6K btu's. Would it be worthwile to plumb it into another exchanger or into a thermal mass water tank in this case?  Any opinions would be appreciated.

Thanks,
Tim Dawson
Palace GeothermalUser is Offline
Veteran Member
Veteran Member
Send Private Message
Posts:1609

--
06 Feb 2011 10:20 AM
No. The desuperheater only reroutes some of the capacity, it does not give you more.
Dewayne Dean

<br>www.PalaceGeothermal.com<br>Why settle for 90% when you can have 400%<br>We heat and cool with dirt!<br>visit- http://welserver.com/WEL0114/- to see my system
geomeUser is Offline
Advanced Member
Advanced Member
Send Private Message
Posts:987

--
06 Feb 2011 12:27 PM
I agree. Keep the DSH turned off if you are not using it.
Homeowner with WF Envision NDV038 (packaged) & NDZ026 (split), one 3000' 4 pipe closed horizontal ground loop, Prestige thermostats, desuperheaters, 85 gal. Marathon.
engineerUser is Offline
Veteran Member
Veteran Member
Send Private Message
Posts:2749

--
06 Feb 2011 12:30 PM
If the DSH is unused (no water pumped through it) refrigerant discharged from the compressor carries all its heat to the air coil
Curt Kinder <br><br>

The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is - Winston Churchill <br><br><a href="http://www.greenersolutionsair.com">www.greenersolutionsair.com</a>
tsddawsonUser is Offline
New Member
New Member
Send Private Message
Posts:7

--
09 Feb 2011 05:14 PM
Thanks for the info.
Was'nt sure if I could get another 6Kbtus out of it, but that makes sense.

Thanks again,
Tim Dawson
cnygeoUser is Offline
Basic Member
Basic Member
Send Private Message
Posts:170

--
09 Feb 2011 05:52 PM
Actually, I think there would be a slight efficiency gain on paper - you would effectively be increasing the size of the of the condenser, which would drop your condensing temp closer to your water or air temp, reducing compressor load. In practice, though, this gain would probably be too small to measure, unless the condenser was really undersized to start with.
jonrUser is Offline
Senior Member
Senior Member
Send Private Message
Posts:5341

--
09 Feb 2011 06:02 PM
I second what cnygeo said.
You are not authorized to post a reply.

Active Forums 4.1
Membership Membership: Latest New User Latest: croccohvacusa New Today New Today: 0 New Yesterday New Yesterday: 0 User Count Overall: 35027
People Online People Online: Visitors Visitors: 579 Members Members: 0 Total Total: 579
Copyright 2011 by BuildCentral, Inc.   Terms Of Use  Privacy Statement