jadi
 New Member
 Posts:6
 |
| 26 Mar 2011 02:36 PM |
|
I'm posting this question b'cos I want to plan ahead what to replace my 15 year 64K btu 80% natgas York furnace with. A/C is 4T, 12 seer. My system is working now but in a few years when it need to be replace I want to be ready to know what I want. I know a few friends who had to replace their system who is 17-18 years old. Most of them just replace what ever their local contractor ( usually joe around the corner ) recommend under emergency situation. My house is 2 story 2100sf. Basement another 1200sf ( unfinish ). Wall r13, attic r46. Temp here is 15F-90F + a few colder winter days & hotter summer days. I have solar that provide 90+% of my electric usage. While doing an energy audit for my solar rebate application, the engineer told me to look into Geo or Dual-fuel for future replacement. I like my thermostat set at 73F in winter & 76F in summer. My most recent gas bill is @ $1.35 per therm delivery & all other charges included. My average gas uasage is 850-920 therm per year base on my pass 5 years history. Electricity is $0.172 per kWh. Bill is $3.00 a month ( customer charge ) so far since solar. I have seen a geothermal open loop system in my area. They don't have nat gas. Like them I have a well for irrigation. If I do go geo, all I need is drill another well for dump( return). But is it worth the while considering I have natural gas. So, what system is more suitable for me here in central/south NJ? GEO or Dual-fuel or a 2stage 95% natgas force-air furnace or anything. All input are greatly appreciated. Thanks Jadi |
|
|
|
|
|
|
engineer
 Veteran Member
 Posts:2749
 |
| 26 Mar 2011 10:09 PM |
|
Kudos to you for planning ahead as well as for your kick-a$$ PV system
Start with a load calculation if you don't already have one. Consider a blower door test to quantify infiltration and identify low hanging weatherization fruit.
After that, feel free to shop geo, but I'll bet it'll be very hard for geo to beat out natural gas given your utility unit costs.
Beware high well pump electricity consumption with open loop geo. It's an easy issue to overlook, but it has significant effect on operating costs and ROI calculation.
|
|
Curt Kinder <br><br>
The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is - Winston Churchill <br><br><a href="http://www.greenersolutionsair.com">www.greenersolutionsair.com</a>
|
|
|
GBT_energy_freak
 New Member
 Posts:13
 |
| 27 Mar 2011 11:01 AM |
|
With all due respect, I disagree with Kurt as your future Geo system will effectively obsolete your existing 4T A/C unit (sell it on eBay) and will save you substantial money on A/C cost compared to your old 12 Seer unit not to mention total elimination of NG expense during heating season. Btw, what is your source for Domestic Hot Water? Depending on your water level pumping cost may not be an issue when using new technology Grundfoss pumps. Btw, how deep your well is nad what its capacity?
Based on your post data, I deducted that your PV system is around 7KW and I wonder which panels did you end up using, how and where did you install them and if you have net metering available where you are. Also, how much did you spend on it and how long you have been using it?
|
|
|
|
|
jonr
 Senior Member
 Posts:5341
 |
| 27 Mar 2011 08:22 PM |
|
At those prices, heating with geo and nat gas (with a modern furnace and average heat pump) are about the same price - and that's not counting pumping costs or the initial install. |
|
|
|
|
GBT_energy_freak
 New Member
 Posts:13
 |
| 28 Mar 2011 08:51 AM |
|
Posted By jonr on 27 Mar 2011 08:22 PM
At those prices, geo and nat gas (with a modern furnace) are about the same price - and that's not counting pumping costs or the initial install.
Hmm..I am totally lost here. First of all Pump & Dump system with average 58-62 Degree incoming water should yield COP close to 4.5-5 on heating cycle which is way too higher of 0.95 most efficient gas furnace. Secondly, the same Geo system will do up to 5.5-7 COP on a cooling cycle. So, what are you comparing may I ask?? |
|
|
|
|
joe.ami
 Veteran Member
 Posts:4377

 |
| 28 Mar 2011 09:06 AM |
|
GBT, love your enthusiasm, but not your numbers. Any one who has ever done an op cost calc on most of the major companies software, knows that average efficiency is 3.5 to 4 for sophisticated equipment. Throwing around peak efficiencies is less helpful. Jadi, Your best bet is to get some estimates and let the sellers convince you about their product. Since you are going to spend thousands on new equipment soon, the playing field is slanted some towards geo (with 30% tax credits on geo). High KW price however suggests you would either want gas aux. or a larger geo system (possibly requiring duct work modification) which will impact your design/price as well. You may also wanna look at FreeWatt. Good Luck, Joe |
|
Joe Hardin www.amicontracting.com We Dig Comfort! www.doityourselfgeothermal.com Dig Your Own Comfort! |
|
|
GBT_energy_freak
 New Member
 Posts:13
 |
|
Looby
 Basic Member
 Posts:401

 |
| 28 Mar 2011 01:21 PM |
|
Posted By GBT_energy_freak on 28 Mar 2011 11:12 AM
I hate to do that but I seriously suggest that you take a gender in this document and then we talk.
I hate to do that, but I seriously suggest that you adjust those numbers
to reflect overall system efficiency -- unless you have a self-pumping
artesian well AND zero-length (or infinite diameter) external ductwork.
Do you need help in converting (CFM x ESP) or (GPM x FTWC) to watts? |
|
| One measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions. |
|
|
TechGromit
 Advanced Member
 Posts:634
 |
| 28 Mar 2011 03:37 PM |
|
Posted By jadi on 26 Mar 2011 02:36 PM
. I have seen a geothermal open loop system in my area. They don't have nat gas. Like them I have a well for irrigation. If I do go geo, all I need is drill another well for dump( return). But is it worth the while considering I have natural gas. So, what system is more suitable for me here in central/south NJ? GEO or Dual-fuel or a 2stage 95% natgas force-air furnace or anything. All input are greatly appreciated. Thanks Jadi
I have a Open loop Geo system in South Jersey and do not have a return well. The ground absorbs water so well here a return well isn't really necessary. I'm assuming your house is fairly small or extremely well insulated, based on your gas usage. $95 a month reminds me of gas bills I had for my first house, it was only 850 sq ft. As Joe pointed out, with the 30% federal tax rebate and the State of New jersey offers another $400 rebate, there are also 0% interest loans or additional rebates available if you meet the programs requirements. If your well can support the additional load, it's pretty much the same cost to switch to a geothermal system as replacing your old gas system. Sometimes the math doesn't quite work out in your favor when basing your currently utilities cost with a Geothermal systems cost and savings, but you have to remember, you'll be protected from possible future price spike with gas. Not that I anticipate any price spikes in the near future, with this fraking process the gas industry has developed, there should be sufficient natural gas supplies for years to come. |
|
|
|
|
geome
 Advanced Member
 Posts:987
 |
| 28 Mar 2011 04:33 PM |
|
small hijack - TG, maybe you could ship us some Jersey tomatoes and corn this summer? :-) |
|
| Homeowner with WF Envision NDV038 (packaged) & NDZ026 (split), one 3000' 4 pipe closed horizontal ground loop, Prestige thermostats, desuperheaters, 85 gal. Marathon. |
|
|
joe.ami
 Veteran Member
 Posts:4377

 |
| 28 Mar 2011 10:56 PM |
|
Posted By GBT_energy_freak on 28 Mar 2011 11:12 AM Joe,
I hate to do that but I seriously suggest that you take a gender in this document and then we talk. Do you need help in converting EER numbers to COP for cooling or you have enough expertise to do it on your own?
GBT, you are playing the kind of number/shell game that makes folks suspect us of snake oil sales. An honest, predictable goal one can meet or exceed based on the thousand plus CM op cost calculations I've run is 3.5 to 4 COP on heating. In MI EER aint that exciting as cooling bills cut in half still save little. There are many geo advocates here, most of us try to offer good advice vs hype. j |
|
Joe Hardin www.amicontracting.com We Dig Comfort! www.doityourselfgeothermal.com Dig Your Own Comfort! |
|
|
jadi
 New Member
 Posts:6
 |
| 29 Mar 2011 12:55 AM |
|
Posted By engineer on 26 Mar 2011 10:09 PM
Kudos to you for planning ahead as well as for your kick-a$$ PV system
Start with a load calculation if you don't already have one. Consider a blower door test to quantify infiltration and identify low hanging weatherization fruit.
After that, feel free to shop geo, but I'll bet it'll be very hard for geo to beat out natural gas given your utility unit costs.
Beware high well pump electricity consumption with open loop geo. It's an easy issue to overlook, but it has significant effect on operating costs and ROI calculation.
I did had 2 installer came to my house. The 1 st was the same installer that did the house in my area. He measure every floor, wall, windows, attic, duct , insulation,....basically everything short of blower door test. He even ask for a copy of the blueprint which he took with him. He called a week later, says he recommend a 5T system w/ aux heat & desuperheater, 80gal tank $18,500. The well driller that he work with who happen to be the same guy that did my well will drill a second well for dump + replace my pump with grundfos veriable speed for $4000. He also suggested that I should look into insulating the main floor since I do not plan to finish my basement. The 2nd installer came and look around but suggest a 2 zone. 3T main floor, 2T 2nd floor, some duct work for second floor. His partner a well driller will do the outside work. Same as the my guy, he will drill a 2nd well, replace with grundfos veriable speed. He also took some measurement and the copy of blueprint. He called 4 weeks later, asked me to meet him at " their " office to go over the contract. Then his "partner" called later that day.....$10,000 for his outside work. Needless to say, I was afraid to meet him at their office. |
|
|
|
|
jadi
 New Member
 Posts:6
 |
| 29 Mar 2011 01:10 AM |
|
Posted By GBT_energy_freak on 27 Mar 2011 11:01 AM
With all due respect, I disagree with Kurt as your future Geo system will effectively obsolete your existing 4T A/C unit (sell it on eBay) and will save you substantial money on A/C cost compared to your old 12 Seer unit not to mention total elimination of NG expense during heating season. Btw, what is your source for Domestic Hot Water? Depending on your water level pumping cost may not be an issue when using new technology Grundfoss pumps. Btw, how deep your well is nad what its capacity?
Based on your post data, I deducted that your PV system is around 7KW and I wonder which panels did you end up using, how and where did you install them and if you have net metering available where you are. Also, how much did you spend on it and how long you have been using it?
City water, gas PV is 7.9K 34 Sharp 235 @ $6.45 Don't know what is net metering. All I know is meter going backward even with A/C on. Maybe something wrong with meter. But I'm not telling the meter man. |
|
|
|
|
jadi
 New Member
 Posts:6
 |
| 29 Mar 2011 01:16 AM |
|
Posted By joe.ami on 28 Mar 2011 09:06 AM
GBT, love your enthusiasm, but not your numbers. Any one who has ever done an op cost calc on most of the major companies software, knows that average efficiency is 3.5 to 4 for sophisticated equipment. Throwing around peak efficiencies is less helpful. Jadi, Your best bet is to get some estimates and let the sellers convince you about their product. Since you are going to spend thousands on new equipment soon, the playing field is slanted some towards geo (with 30% tax credits on geo). High KW price however suggests you would either want gas aux. or a larger geo system (possibly requiring duct work modification) which will impact your design/price as well. You may also wanna look at FreeWatt. Good Luck, Joe
I will look into it. thanks Joe |
|
|
|
|
jadi
 New Member
 Posts:6
 |
| 29 Mar 2011 01:42 AM |
|
Posted By TechGromit on 28 Mar I have a Open loop Geo system in South Jersey and do not have a return well. The ground absorbs water so well here a return well isn't really necessary. I'm assuming your house is fairly small or extremely well insulated, based on your gas usage. $95 a month reminds me of gas bills I had for my first house, it was only 850 sq ft. As Joe pointed out, with the 30% federal tax rebate and the State of New jersey offers another $400 rebate, there are also 0% interest loans or additional rebates available if you meet the programs requirements. If your well can support the additional load, it's pretty much the same cost to switch to a geothermal system as replacing your old gas system. Sometimes the math doesn't quite work out in your favor when basing your currently utilities cost with a Geothermal systems cost and savings, but you have to remember, you'll be protected from possible future price spike with gas. Not that I anticipate any price spikes in the near future, with this fraking process the gas industry has developed, there should be sufficient natural gas supplies for years to come.
I live in a housing development. Ground here is very hard. Dumping well is a must if go geo. House is 2100 sq ft. + basement. thermostat set @ 11pm - 6am set at 60F ( bed time) 6am - 2pm set @ 72 2pm- 8pm set @ 65 (at work) 8pm -11pm set @ 72 Family room, kitchen, eating area all facing south slightly east. Lots of windows , a sliding door. Lots of morning to afternoon sun. Have to remember to leave all blind there open before bed. Its been our routine for years. |
|
|
|
|
jonr
 Senior Member
 Posts:5341
 |
| 29 Mar 2011 08:55 AM |
|
Just a note for people considering the open loop discharge issue - depending on well geometries, one can put most of the water back into the supply well (called standing column).
|
|
|
|
|
GBT_energy_freak
 New Member
 Posts:13
 |
| 29 Mar 2011 12:49 PM |
|
Posted By jonr on 29 Mar 2011 08:55 AM
Just a note for people considering the open loop discharge issue - depending on well geometries, one can put most of the water back into the supply well (called standing column).
WOW...thus further deteriorating overall system performance and efficiency. Is that the reason why most of your "installations" reach overall 3 COP at best??? |
|
|
|
|
jadi
 New Member
 Posts:6
 |
| 29 Mar 2011 04:25 PM |
|
Posted By GBT_energy_freak on 29 Mar 2011 12:49 PM
Posted By jonr on 29 Mar 2011 08:55 AM
Just a note for people considering the open loop discharge issue - depending on well geometries, one can put most of the water back into the supply well (called standing column).
WOW...thus further deteriorating overall system performance and efficiency.
I agree with GBT. Btw my well is 90' deep. Water table is high at 35' in 1996 when we drilled. Higher now after last few years of crazy weather. My well driller said it was at " 1000 year high " the last time I spoke to him about drilling a second well for geo a few months ago. After letting my water run for 2 hours I measure the temp@ constant 57F & 6.6 - 6.8 ph. |
|
|
|
|
joe.ami
 Veteran Member
 Posts:4377

 |
| 30 Mar 2011 06:55 AM |
|
Posted By GBT_energy_freak on 29 Mar 2011 12:49 PM
Posted By jonr on 29 Mar 2011 08:55 AM Just a note for people considering the open loop discharge issue - depending on well geometries, one can put most of the water back into the supply well (called standing column).
WOW...thus further deteriorating overall system performance and efficiency. Is that the reason why most of your "installations" reach overall 3 COP at best???
Jon? Are you only getting 3 COP at best from your "installations"?    TOO RICH!    Jadi, SCW's are rather popular on the East coast, but you would need more well than you have. |
|
Joe Hardin www.amicontracting.com We Dig Comfort! www.doityourselfgeothermal.com Dig Your Own Comfort! |
|
|
jonr
 Senior Member
 Posts:5341
 |
| 30 Mar 2011 09:00 AM |
|
Hah, I can even say that I've never had a geo "installation" where COP was optimized to the detriment of overall cost effectiveness.
|
|
|
|
|