Posted By engineer on 13 Oct 2012 01:06 PM
Posted By joe.ami on 11 Oct 2012 10:17 AM
Posted By engineer on 10 Oct 2012 09:01 PM
In a far northern climate "conditioned" air means heated air most of the year - one pays twice - once to heat the room and again to heat the water. It is not an automatic disqualifier, but must be considered.
Agreed. We did the math on this once upon a time. At the very least found payback horizon out there a ways. Not necessarily a deal breaker, but a HPWH at 3 COP using heat created at 4 COP does not mean you are getting 7 COP
.
Of course not! - Coefficients are multiplicative, not additive, so instead of 3 COP + 4 COP = 7 COP, it is 3 COP X 4 COP = 12 COP!
Something like that, anyway...
That's some pretty kewl math y'all are into- I like it!
But let's lay it out for the kids in the back row who weren't paying attention in class, lest we create a new generation of perpetual-motion theorists, eh?
A heat pump doesn't create the heat, it only moves it. If you move 4x the amount of heat (from the ground, outdoor air, whatever) into the house than you would spending that same energy to heat the space directly, the coefficient of performance (COP) is 4, which is about where purty-good geo systems run.
But no matter how efficiently you then move the heat from room air to the water, the total COP does not (and simply CAN NOT) exceed that of the original COP=4. Having to use
any additional energy at all to move the heat from the air to the water means you've spent more energy for moving the heat without taking any more heat in from the outdoors,
reducing the net COP. But as long as that net COP is still greater than 1 (which is what you get out of a standard hot water heater's resistive elements) you still garner an efficiency advantage.