Posted By tbm878 on 05 Mar 2012 11:21 PM
A couple more thoughts....
Would it be worth the small extra cost to install the extra 2" (so 4" total) of under slab insulation in the basement? I am not using radiant floor heat, and i do see the basement being finished at a later date but not for a good 10 years.
Also, how about the garage floor? I had planned to install 2" of foam under the garage floor slab. I do plan on installing a small natural gas unit heater at ceiling height to make the winter temps more bearable if i'm working in the garage. I do not anticipate spending a ton of time out there in the winter months. Would the garage slab insulation be worth it in the end (total cost of about $500)? Oh, and should i insulate the exterior 4' garage foundation walls too?
The breakdown of how much sub-slab R is "worth it" depends on several factors:
*Your location/climate/
subsoil-temp*Your per BTU fuel pricing & mechanical systems efficiency
*The cost per R per square foot of the foam
*The relative R-value of the soil type
Buying reclaimed goods your foam costs are dramatically less than the ~10cents/R/square-foot of virgin-stock EPS, more like 2-4 cents/r-ft, depending on the deal. The installation labor may be ever so slightly higher than with virgin stock due to more sorting and ding-repair, but probably not even 10% more, so figure the installed cost of the foam will be something like half.
For virgin-stock foam and average utility costs the sub-slab foam that makes some longer-term economic sense can be found on the right-most column of Table 2, p10 of
this document, sorted by the
US climate zone number, found in the left-most column. If you're paying half as much for the foam and you're heating is something like propane or oil (not recommended) going 2-3x those valued might have a reasonable net-present-value, but if the heating is supplied by geothermal in a low-electricity cost market or condensing gas in a low natural-gas cost area anything more than the recommended values might have a long payback, even with half-price foam. At 4x those values the lifecycle cost of virgin stock is probably more expensive than photovoltaic electricity driving mini-split heat pumps, (a criticism often leveled at the PassiveHouse folks for their high-R sub-slab recommendations by people on the Net Zero Energy side of the fence) but may still beat that metric when using reclaimed goods.
The subsoil R will vary by soil type and moisture content, distance to the water-table, etc, and it would almost always be cheaper to add another R8 in reclaimed EPS than it would be to do the site-testing to figure out if it was actually necessary.
So, long story short, if you live in US zones 5 or higher doubling up the sub-slab EPS to 4" for ~R16 would almost always make some economic sense with half-priced foam. In zones 7 & 8 there's probably a rationale for taking it to 6" (~R24). But in zones 3 & 4, maybe not, unless you have expensive utility costs. In zones 1 & 2 (and even the warm edge of zone 3) it's very design and site specific- sometimes "earth coupling" the house to the subsoil can reduce heating & cooling costs, but in very high-R homes PassiveHouse style you may still want some sub-slab R in those zones. The only way to tell for sure would be to model the whole house with site, orientation, and climate factors for it's estimated energy use with either a pretty good freebie like
DOE2 or
BeOpt, or the (relatively) low cost
PassiveHouse tools.
It's worth insulating the garage foundation as well, but probably not to much more than in the table in the BSC RR-1005 document. (Note that the R-values are for "whole assembly" R, with all thermal bridging from framing factored in, eg: A wood sheathed wood-siding 2x6 wall with R20 insulation between the studs and a 20% framing fraction comes in at ~R14, not R20.)