Posted By kogashuko on 20 Jan 2013 11:37 PM
Yes very aware of the house wrap providing nothing other than a vapor barrier. 2x4 framing and located in Virginia so it meets code. However, since I dont want to pull drywall down later I would like to get it right the first time. Oh and I wish we had used a radiant barrier under the siding too. The existing house not only has 1 inch rigid foam but rigid foam with a radiant barrier. Seems kind of odd for late 1980s construction but it is nice. The radiant barrier does play hell with the cell phone reception out here too. I have a sprint airave for the inside of my house and since they left the existing insulation in the walls between the addition the thing does zero for cell reception in my addition. Also, worst case scenario the existing house only has R9 between the studs. Unfortunately, I found the same insulation under the attic stairs which were over the main staircase to the house. I had to rip out the stairs to put in R30 and reshim the existing framing to allow space for the R30. The stairway is no longer a hot or cold experience to walk up and down.
House wrap is highly vapor-permable, and absolutely NOT a vapor barrier. If properly detailed (that's a big "if"), it can be made into an AIR barrier.
Radiant barrier is nearly worthless under siding. It requires real air gaps on both sides of the material to achieve any significant performance, and then only at the temperature extremes. But the inch of rigid foam makes a 2x4 wall perform as well as a 2x6 wall. If there is at least 3/4" of nothing but air between the radiant barrier and the siding it may be giving you somewhat better than an R1 average improvement in performance but not much more, whereas the foam is giving you pretty much it's rated R/inch. (~R4 if EPS, ~R6 if polyiso.)
It's usually possible to "dense-pack" fiber insulation over the thin "econobatts" without opening up the wall. This is done by drilling a ~2.5" hole in either side of the wall at each bay and snaking in the blowing tube to the top/bottom of the bay before blowing. In doing so it compresses the batts a bit (to a higher R/inch density) and adds R value, but it also dramatically improves air-tightness. This is usually a very worthwhile retrofit in a VA climate.
Back to the original question, compressing an R30 batt into a 7.25" space delivers R25 at center-cavity, so if you took it all the way down to 7.0" you'd be looking at ~R24. But the thermal bridging of the studs cuts that down substantially to no more than R19-R20.
http://numsum.com/spreadsheet/show/21111 (<< those are Owens-Corning's numbers- Certainteed has published similar tables with identical numbers.)
Any fiber-insulated cavity that is not fully filled will suffer severe performance loss issues at the temperature exteremes due to parasitic convection currents within the cavity and through/around the batt. It's far better to compression-fit a fatter low-mid-density batt into the space than it is to only partially fill the cavity.