Wall thickness and diminishing returns
Last Post 08 Jul 2015 11:55 AM by Dana1. 1 Replies.
Printer Friendly
Sort:
PrevPrev NextNext
You are not authorized to post a reply.
Author Messages
gonyoUser is Offline
New Member
New Member
Send Private Message
Posts:2

--
08 Jul 2015 10:24 AM

So I live in Fairbanks Alaska and I've begun the process of building a home up here decided on the plan got the land pending. The standard construction up here is 2x6 24" on center I read this book www.uaa.alaska.edu/civilengineering/arctic/upload/Building_in_the_North.pdf called building in the north it says that the best wall thickness based on money to the amount of R-Value you get is 2x8 but that part of the book hasn't been updated since the 80's. Just kind of curious if anything has changed, is there a wall thickness that the general consensus says just gives more back fot the buck.  I under stand there are a lot of other factors to factor into wall r-value ie. windows, doors, vapor barrier and so on just trying to figure out the best bang for the buck.

In Fairbanks Alaska we had 13940 Heating Degree Days in 2014

Thanks

Dana1User is Offline
Senior Member
Senior Member
Send Private Message
Posts:6991

--
08 Jul 2015 11:55 AM
A lot depends on your material costs and anticipated present (and future) fuel costs.  A good starting place is Table 2, p10 (PDF pagination) of this document

Fairbanks is climate zone 8, so look at the row for zone 8.  Note, those are "whole-assembly-R", not center-cavity framed wall values.  eg- A 2x12 studwall 24" o.c. withR50  high density rock wool comes in at about R33 whole-wall, after factoring in the thermal bridging of the studs.  Add 4" of Type-II (1.5lb density) rigid EPS to the exterior of that an you're there (but a double studwall approach would be cheaper.)

IRC code min is 2x4/R13 studwall + R10 continuous sheathing  or 2x6/R20 + R5 continous sheathing (either of which is about R21 whole-wall)  but that would be woefully shy of an optimal net-present-value over a 25-50 year lifecycle in Fairbanks. 

A 2x8 24" o.c. wall with R30 high density batts and wood siding comes in at about R21-R22 whole wall. That may be cheaper to build than an R20 + R5c.i. code min, but it's still just code min. Adding 3" of rigid rock wool or EPS to the exterior of that would bring it up to about R35-ish, and in your climate it's "worth it" if you plan to live there for awhile.

To hit R50-ish on the cheap usually involves a double-studwall  or Larsen Truss construction with blown fiber insulation between the studs, though some in my area have been doing that with open cell spray polyurethane about as cheaply as with blown cellulose or fiberglass.  With 2x4 double studwalls it takes about a 14-15" thick wall to hit R50 whole-wall with cellulose. With high-density rock wool or high-density fiberglass you can get there in about 13".
You are not authorized to post a reply.

Active Forums 4.1
Membership Membership: Latest New User Latest: croccohvacusa New Today New Today: 0 New Yesterday New Yesterday: 0 User Count Overall: 35027
People Online People Online: Visitors Visitors: 233 Members Members: 0 Total Total: 233
Copyright 2011 by BuildCentral, Inc.   Terms Of Use  Privacy Statement