Been busy writing a sell sheet mini/erv my
proposed design report for a Dr client that never heard of them, typical, said he wants
to research it and I bet he ends up with the same questions……this is an
interesting one to model see how close I can get.
I see GBA blogger D1 chimed in
now we are on the slopes of the eastern cascades skiing?? Hot coco on the house
@ RandySea Cascade Cabin Oasis? I’d been more impressed if you predicted the
unit was not freezing before he told you but, I do admire the absolute humidity
theory to explain. Oh, how simple complex physics can become when needed.The rest of your post made me feel like I just got out of a Mitsubishi factory test lab, been there done that many times & wrote those final test reports you are reading that cannot be used alone in situ like this, can be way off I'll prove to you all soon. Not sure what that all had to do with one at a job site or the answer to the question.
<!--[if gte mso 9]>
Normal
0
false
false
false
EN-US
X-NONE
X-NONE
“I moved a Mitsubishi MSZ-GE12NA-9 and
MUZ-GE12NA2 over to the cabin. "
NA9 wall mount 1 ton
indoor/outdoor system, 12NA2 1 ton outdoor unit. 22 SEER, 11.4 HSPF, single zoned.
Have inverter driven
compressor valves that continuously modulates compressor or heating and cooling
vs stop/start.
Now that I took the time to
look deeper, your running 2-1 ton outdoor units 1- 12K indoor, 500 SF, both not
shown in NEEPs cold climate database. It explains the issues with HSPF in low cold
temp performances (tested @ steady state, sub-17F), provides better info than mfgs. These properties are
related and one should not be changed w/o changing the other.
http://www.neep.org/initiatives/hig...-heat-pump
The E-Plus sim model I ran used CC-MSHP VRF flow that allows
for more accurate performance at part load and low temps with capacity
retention and impact of pan heaters on performance. Retention of heat capacity
at colder climates is highly related to system size.
I applied a Heating Capacity Retention fractions to the
model, not sure what yours are so I’ll use values for MSZ-FH12NA2 26 SEER, 12.5
HSPF to see how it would perform in 6. Max heat retention 65% @ 5F /47 F max,
100 % @ 5F/17F maintenance capacities. -5F is the outdoor dry bulb temp at
which the fraction is defined. Limited COP points can be misleading so, the sim
model uses a liner relationship between this point and the rating point to
determine max heating capacity as a function of outdoor ambient temp and sensible/latent
heat curves from a TMY3 weather tower.
I’ll keep the party in Spokane since it’s the closest tower
I can find at elevation ~ 1850'. Vapor drive based on temperature of water, absorbent
state, not air or absolute humidity alone, are the determining factors of
frost/thaw cycles but, to simplify the model uses RH most Z6 area winters
>60%.
Pan heaters typically operate when the compressor is running
& outdoor dry bulb temp thermistor is < 32F & typically reduces HSPF
.1-1.0 points. NA2 uses 106W that won’t have much impact on COP about 15%
reduction.
Other values I used:
Heat Capacity Retention factor is X temp (5 & 17F)/47 F.
Heating capacity offset (difference between heating/cooling
capacities) 1,600 BTU/HR
.40(RC) min cooling, 1.20 max.
Min rated cooling capacity:
2500 min/12K rated = .2btu/hr
4.
Max rated cooling capacity: 13,600 max/12K rated
= 1.1
5.
Min/Max Heat flows/ton: 200-400. Cooling: 200-425
cfm/ton
6.
SHR .73
7.
Fan: .07 W/cfm
Ra Ran two conditions,
1.
1. Auto size for max heating/cooling load.
2.
2. Size up
to 1.3X for VSR in colder climates when heating exceeds cooling (per ACCA
Manual S)
-5F retention temp results shown. Auto-sizing shows more
heating at max or using Manual S. SML-F (size for max load false, uses MJ/S) SML-T size
for max load true used simulated design conditions). Resulted the same more heating loads in Z6.
Required MJ8/S capacities
are for more efficient unit than your models so your capacity requirements s/b
higher. I don’t think a 1 ton is going to cut it according to it try 2.

E-PLUS supposedly more accurate, less conservative, less empirical
than MJ8 shows heating capacities under 1 ton. MJ8 50%+ oversizes too much this is much lower...
Both BB(blue) and CC-MSHP(orange) are superimposed in graph
charts. When I zoom in close you can CC-MSHP is delivering slightly lower btu/hr
stand alone to maintain 50F in a small 500 SF cabin, Spokane, in the month of Jan where your peak loads are.

As far as stand alone site metered peak power consumption CC-MSHP
is far less I’d be running it anytime I could, use BB for back up only.

<!--[if gte mso 9]>
Normal
0
false
false
false
EN-US
X-NONE
X-NONE