|
|
|
Does a mini split make sense in my climate?
Last Post 19 Dec 2017 05:33 PM by SciGuy. 17 Replies.
|
Sort:
|
|
Prev Next |
You are not authorized to post a reply. |
|
SciGuy
 New Member
 Posts:33
 |
| 09 Dec 2017 08:33 PM |
|
I've just moved into a cabin built in the 1980s as a family's weekend snowmobile getaway. Originally they heated it with electric base board but eventually put in a supposedly high efficiency propane fired forced air unit as it would take a couple of days to warm the place with just base board and then they'd be heading home. Electric here is ~ $ .15/kw and propane ~ $2.50 per gallon so they're both quite spendy to heat with on a full time basis. The There's about 600sf on the ground floor and a loft area of another couple hundred or so square feet. The place has a good deal of glass including a set of sliding glass doors. Every time the propane furnace kicks on in the night I envision dollar bills flying down the road. The cabin is located in the 13325 zip code which puts it in zone 4b. I know that manufactures have made great strides in extracting heat down to lower and lower air temperatures but wonder it it's just too cold here to benefit.
The interior of the cabin is largely an open layout so a single head might well do the trick.
Thanks for any advice regarding how to decide and as well as what units might perform in this climate.
Hugh
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
jonr
 Senior Member
 Posts:5341
 |
| 09 Dec 2017 10:10 PM |
|
Yes, you can beat the operating cost of propane with a cold climate heat pump (eg, Fujitsu 12RLS3YH) in your area. You should air seal, insulate better and then calculate your load to properly size the heat pump. |
|
|
|
|
Dana1
 Senior Member
 Posts:6991
 |
| 11 Dec 2017 05:21 PM |
|
ZIP (not area) code 13325, in Lewis County NY, is NOT in US climate 4B, it's climate zone 6A. https://energycode.pnl.gov/EnergyCodeReqs/?state=New%20York Yes, even though your 99% outside design temp is in negative single digits, and it sometimes hits double digits there are mini-split solutions that work well here. Odds are pretty good that a 3/4 ton or 1-ton cold climate mini-split running on 15 cent electricity would beat $2.50 propane by quite a bit. The rated HSPFs are 12-14 BTU per watt-hour (12,000-14,000 BTU per kwh), and at a 50F standby temp the average efficiency would be higher than that. The binned hourly mean temperature in January in your location is about +20F, which is a 30F delta from an indoor design temp of 50F. At that temperature-delta most mini-splits will beat their HSPF numbers for efficiency.) But even worst-casing it at an as-used HSPF 10 it would only take ~9kwh to deliver the SOURCE FUEL BTU of a gallon of propane, ~8kwh to deliver the net-heat output of a condensing propane heater per gallon of fuel use, ~7kwh to deliver the gallon output of a typical 80-83% efficiency propane wall furnace. 9 x $0.15= $1.35, so its really half the cost of heating with propane, even using a worse than worst-case efficiency assumption on the mini-split. If it dwells under -20F in that location for hours or days on end it will be safer to go with Fujitsu if freeze-up is a concern, since the Mitsubishi units will turn off at some low temp (below -18F) but automatically restart when temps rise to -13F. Fujitsu units will just keep on keeping-on at arbitrarily low temperatures. But the he existing electric baseboards could also serve as the hail- Mary backup plan for when the mini-split can't keep up (or fails unexpectedly), or for when a Mitsubishi goes into it's auto-shutdown mode for a few hours. If any of that glass is single-pane it's worth installing low-E storm windows (or insulating shutters) over them, even assuming 50F standby operation.
|
|
|
|
|
Dana1
 Senior Member
 Posts:6991
 |
| 11 Dec 2017 05:21 PM |
|
deleted double-post |
|
|
|
|
SciGuy
 New Member
 Posts:33
 |
| 11 Dec 2017 08:53 PM |
|
Posted By Dana1 on 11 Dec 2017 05:21 PM
ZIP (not area) code 13325, in Lewis County NY, is NOT in US climate 4B, it's climate zone 6A. https://energycode.pnl.gov/EnergyCodeReqs/?state=New%20York Yes, even though your 99% outside design temp is in negative single digits, and it sometimes hits double digits there are mini-split solutions that work well here. Odds are pretty good that a 3/4 ton or 1-ton cold climate mini-split running on 15 cent electricity would beat $2.50 propane by quite a bit. The rated HSPFs are 12-14 BTU per watt-hour (12,000-14,000 BTU per kwh), and at a 50F standby temp the average efficiency would be higher than that. The binned hourly mean temperature in January in your location is about +20F, which is a 30F delta from an indoor design temp of 50F. At that temperature-delta most mini-splits will beat their HSPF numbers for efficiency.) But even worst-casing it at an as-used HSPF 10 it would only take ~9kwh to deliver the SOURCE FUEL BTU of a gallon of propane, ~8kwh to deliver the net-heat output of a condensing propane heater per gallon of fuel use, ~7kwh to deliver the gallon output of a typical 80-83% efficiency propane wall furnace. 9 x $0.15= $1.35, so its really half the cost of heating with propane, even using a worse than worst-case efficiency assumption on the mini-split. If it dwells under -20F in that location for hours or days on end it will be safer to go with Fujitsu if freeze-up is a concern, since the Mitsubishi units will turn off at some low temp (below -18F) but automatically restart when temps rise to -13F. Fujitsu units will just keep on keeping-on at arbitrarily low temperatures. But the he existing electric baseboards could also serve as the hail- Mary backup plan for when the mini-split can't keep up (or fails unexpectedly), or for when a Mitsubishi goes into it's auto-shutdown mode for a few hours. If any of that glass is single-pane it's worth installing low-E storm windows (or insulating shutters) over them, even assuming 50F standby operation.
Dana, Thanks so much for the excellent detailed reply. To make things even more dire, the forced air propane furnace is installed in a 24" head height dirt floored crawl space under the cabin that lacks a vapor barrier of any type. The foundation has a couple of inches of extruded polystyrene applied to the interior surface but one can picture the immense amount of heat being absorbed by the always cool earth below. the heat runs. The vaulted roof of the cabin appears to be poorly insulated when you observe the pattern of snow melt that occurs on days where the temperature is in the low 20s with no sun. On the bright side the roof is nearly in need of a new shingle job and it would be a great time to install a thick layer of recycled sheet insulation on top of the roof decking at that time. There are several sides of the house with sufficient roof overhand to do the same thing. After a winter of living here we'll weigh the pros and cons of making improvements versus moving on. Right now we need to get the cost of heating pared to a reasonable level. Wood pellets are quite reasonably priced here at ~ $225 per ton and a we have a fireplace chimney that would function as a venting passage without even drilling a wall. The heat would be generated in the living space instead of under it The technology is quite mature with knowledgeable local repair people with parts on hand. One thing about air source heat pumps that would worry me is the lack of experienced local installation and repair people. That's the next thing to investigate. Best Regards, Hugh |
|
|
|
|
Dana1
 Senior Member
 Posts:6991
 |
| 11 Dec 2017 11:15 PM |
|
With the propane furnace in an unvented crawlspace with naked polystyrene on the walls (no thermal barrier) there is a potential fire/explosion hazard. I'm not sure what current code is for that sort of installation. Propane is heavier than air, and will tend to settle into the lowest enclosed space and hang around there. On the floor of the crawlspace a couple inches of reclaimed EPS or XPS under a vapor barrier and a ~1.5-2" rat-slab might be in order over the longer term, but that's not the highest priority. Fireplaces are notorius heat leaks, with 24/365 air leaks until you plug it with something. Plugging the flue with a pellet stove vent would be a good start! Pellet stoves are certainly going to have a lower installed cost than a mini-split, but when you're away for weeks at a time I'm not sure how you're going to manage keeping it fueled and operating when you're not there. Since there is a pre-existing ducted distribution system, it's possible that you can use a Fujitsu RLFCD type mini-duct cassette in lieu of the (likely oversized) propane furnace. The 1-ton 12RLFCD is good for about 16,000 BTU/hr @ +17F, and still has a tested-rated output at -4F would keep going even at lower temps, and would probably cover the heat load well into negative double digits at an indoor design temp of +50F (your "away" mode.) The 9RLFCD might do it too. You might need/want to hack the ducts to make the runs shorter but higher velocity and better "throw", since the cassette isn't as powerful as a furnace air handler. But if it's all wide open an xxRLS3 type wall coil would do just fine, more efficient, and easier to install. http://www.fujitsugeneral.com/us/resources/pdf/support/downloads/submittal-sheets/12RLFCD.pdf http://portal.fujitsugeneral.com/files/catalog/files/9RLFCD.pdf https://portal.fujitsugeneral.com/files/catalog/files/12RLS3H6.pdf There are installation & service outfits for mini-splits within a reasonable drive of your place, including a couple of better trained Fujitsu "Elite" contractors within 40 miles of that ZIP code: http://contractors.fujitsugeneral.com/search/index.cfm?int_radius=100&str_zip=13325&contractor_type=Residential Mitsubishi won't tell you who is covering your area without sharing some personal info on their contractor-finder site, but apparently none of their better-trained "Diamond" contractors are currently serving that zip code: http://www.mitsubishicomfort.com/contractors So, run some heat load numbers, at both 50F indoors and at 70F, at an outside design temp of say, -5F (which is pretty close to your 99% outside design temp.)
|
|
|
|
|
SciGuy
 New Member
 Posts:33
 |
| 11 Dec 2017 11:48 PM |
|
Posted By Dana1 on 11 Dec 2017 11:15 PM
With the propane furnace in an unvented crawlspace with naked polystyrene on the walls (no thermal barrier) there is a potential fire/explosion hazard. I'm not sure what current code is for that sort of installation. Propane is heavier than air, and will tend to settle into the lowest enclosed space and hang around there. On the floor of the crawlspace a couple inches of reclaimed EPS or XPS under a vapor barrier and a ~1.5-2" rat-slab might be in order over the longer term, but that's not the highest priority. Fireplaces are notorius heat leaks, with 24/365 air leaks until you plug it with something. Plugging the flue with a pellet stove vent would be a good start! Pellet stoves are certainly going to have a lower installed cost than a mini-split, but when you're away for weeks at a time I'm not sure how you're going to manage keeping it fueled and operating when you're not there. Since there is a pre-existing ducted distribution system, it's possible that you can use a Fujitsu RLFCD type mini-duct cassette in lieu of the (likely oversized) propane furnace. The 1-ton 12RLFCD is good for about 16,000 BTU/hr @ +17F, and still has a tested-rated output at -4F would keep going even at lower temps, and would probably cover the heat load well into negative double digits at an indoor design temp of +50F (your "away" mode.) The 9RLFCD might do it too. You might need/want to hack the ducts to make the runs shorter but higher velocity and better "throw", since the cassette isn't as powerful as a furnace air handler. But if it's all wide open an xxRLS3 type wall coil would do just fine, more efficient, and easier to install. http://www.fujitsugeneral.com/us/resources/pdf/support/downloads/submittal-sheets/12RLFCD.pdf http://portal.fujitsugeneral.com/files/catalog/files/9RLFCD.pdf https://portal.fujitsugeneral.com/files/catalog/files/12RLS3H6.pdf There are installation & service outfits for mini-splits within a reasonable drive of your place, including a couple of better trained Fujitsu "Elite" contractors within 40 miles of that ZIP code: http://contractors.fujitsugeneral.com/search/index.cfm?int_radius=100&str_zip=13325&contractor_type=Residential Mitsubishi won't tell you who is covering your area without sharing some personal info on their contractor-finder site, but apparently none of their better-trained "Diamond" contractors are currently serving that zip code: http://www.mitsubishicomfort.com/contractors So, run some heat load numbers, at both 50F indoors and at 70F, at an outside design temp of say, -5F (which is pretty close to your 99% outside design temp.)
Dana, Thanks for the additional well considered bits and pieces. The thought of the fire potential for the propane in the crawl space is really unsettling. The propane furnace which is direct vented draws its combustion air from the interior of the cabin through an access hole in the floor of a closet the houses the electric hot water heater. When it's firing, I can feel a strong draft coming around the poorly sealed door to the mud room. There was a 3/4" gap under this door when I first came that I sealed with a flexible sweep but now I'm wondering if I cut down the furnace's combustion air supply. I would think the furnace should have its own air intake. The folks that came and serviced it didn't mention any problem:( In regards to doing a rat slab, there's currently only 24" between the soil and the bottom of the floor joists. If one installed 2" of EPS + 2" of concrete you'd be down to 20". I'm claustrophobic in a 36" crawl space and can't imagine how you'd get concrete in there. It probably wasn't clear but we intend to live in the cabin full time, probably not leaving for any great amount of time in the winter. So we're more interested in heating to ~70*F as apposed to just the 50*F level. The locals tell us it's often in the below -15*F area for days at a time. I've contacted two of the closer Fujitsu installers listed on their web page and will be interested to hear what they have to say. Best Regards Hugh |
|
|
|
|
Dana1
 Senior Member
 Posts:6991
 |
| 12 Dec 2017 03:56 PM |
|
It is literally NEVER < -15F in the area for days at a time (OK, maybe that happened frequently during the last ice age...) but during a cold snap that could be the daily LOW temperature for several days in a row. The number of days over the past decade where it didn't break in to positive digits for a daily high can probably be counted on your fingers. (The Polar Vortex cold snap event of 2014 probably accounted for half of those days.) The draft you are feeling when the furnace is running is not combustion air. About 99.9% of the time that sort of symptom can be traced to duct imbalance &/or duct leakage issues. Running the load numbers for both 50F and 70F is still useful, to know what your relative efficiency will be while away, and to be able to guarantee sufficient capacity while you're there. If you have a heating history on this place it's possible to estimate the heat as-is heat load by fuel consumption. Exact fill-up dates & quantities during a winter period during which the place was continuously heated would be the most accurate. The methods for the napkin-math (it's OK to use a spreadsheet tool :-) ) are spelled out here: http://www.greenbuildingadvisor.com/blogs/dept/guest-blogs/out-old-new Using a totally crummy rule-of thumb approach, fairly tight 2x4 framed house with medium glazing area of clear-glass (not low-E) double panes or storms over single panes and at least R19 in the attic/roof would come in between 15-20 BTU/hr per foot of conditioned space @ 0F, about 15% higher than that at -10F. It'll be on the low end of that range if the foundation is insulated (check), but at the high end if there is a lot of glazed area (also check). If it leaks a lot of air (maybe) it could even hit 25 BTU/hr per foot @ 0F, 30 BTU/hr per ft @ -10F. So absolute worst-casing it at 800 square feet & 30 BTU/hr per square foot you'd be looking at 24,000 BTU/hr @ -10F, but reality is more likely to be 600' x 20 BTU/ft= 12,000 BTU/hr, literally half the absolute worst-case. That's quite a range using WAG rules of thumb, and THAT is why it's necessary to run a real heat load calculation. As a backup (or even primary) heating system it might be better to put a small (<35,000 BTU) wood stove or fireplace insert rather than a pellet stove, on the basis that wood stoves don't need power to operate, whereas mini-splits and pellet stoves do. A wood stove with a bit of thermal mass such as a soapstone or ceramic type would be able to keep a 600' cabin from turning into a sauna. When the local grid goes down in a howling winter storm it makes a difference! |
|
|
|
|
SciGuy
 New Member
 Posts:33
 |
| 12 Dec 2017 11:20 PM |
|
More excellent feedback! Perhaps the locals are attempting to strike terror into our hearts. If you have a heating history on this place it's possible to estimate the heat as-is heat load by fuel consumption. Exact fill-up dates & quantities during a winter period during which the place was continuously heated would be the most accurate. The methods for the napkin-math (it's OK to use a spreadsheet tool :-) ) are spelled out here: It looks like we used 2/80 of the 200 gallon capacity over the past three days to keep the cabin at at ~ 60*F. So that's ~ 5 gallons X 91,333 BTUs/ gallon X .8 (?) /72 hours or about 5100 BTUs per hour to hold the cabin at ~ 60*F. I realize that's too short a time for precision especially in light of the propane tanks gauge granularity but it at least gives and an order of magnitude based on the furnace having an 80% efficient. I'll send my diminutive gal pal into the craw space to get its particulars. The weather has varied from low teens at night to just bumping 32*F today. I bet i can get the approximate heating degree days from a reasonable source. That appear to be in line with your back of the napkin math. I'm timing the furnace duty time as I sit here with it 25*F outside and 60*F inside and see ~4 minutes on and 16 off or about 20% How small did they make those furnaces? As a backup (or even primary) heating system it might be better to put a small (<35,000 BTU) wood stove or fireplace insert rather than a pellet stove, on the basis that wood stoves don't need power to operate, whereas mini-splits and pellet stoves do. A wood stove with a bit of thermal mass such as a soapstone or ceramic type would be able to keep a 600' cabin from turning into a sauna. When the local grid goes down in a howling winter storm it makes a difference! A wood stove is attractive for the reason you mentioned but I worry that running one at a low burn long term for the low load would be an invitation for creosote production and chimney fires. Been there, done that and it's way too exciting. Might a small kerosene heater with 10 or 15 gallons in reserve might make for a cost effective power out heat source for a few days of power out? The chimney on the cabin is external to the living space and is well thermally coupled to that space by the 8' X 5' fire place. If one was attempting to build a way to lose heat from a structure they'd be well served to copy this double flue monstrosity/ If we decide to stay here it's being torn down. Thanks so much fr you well reason help. Hugh |
|
|
|
|
upstatepuzzle
 New Member
 Posts:3
 |
| 12 Dec 2017 11:39 PM |
|
to clarify something Dana1 said, the minisplit has a "minimum heat" setting of 50°. you initially mentioned going there on a weekend and it would take 2 days to warm it up, which is what i believe he was responding to. rest assured the minisplit does better than that! i have 2 houses both around 700 ft² on the 5/6 climates zone border upstate NY, if i might share my thoughts and strategies.... one has a minisplit, the other has a woodstove and will soon have a minisplit. i don't expect full heating from the new minisplit on the coldest nights, but expect it to be a great baseline while the woodstove can provide the extra warmth in active hours. I'm getting a fujitsu rls9 the ultra low heat model, it also has wifi so i can keep it on minimum heat all week and then crank it from afar when i head up. wood stove, not pellet stove. how often does the power go out? it's goes out all the time at my place, get a newer, high efficiency EPA standard stove. you'll burn less wood and produce faaaar less pollution than an older stove, and the new ones generally have glass windows where you can watch the fire. they're great. you will need dry seasoned firewood if you intend to use it this winter, which means you'll have to buy it. you'll come close to paying for the price difference for an efficient stove in the reduced wood cost the first winter. if you are just "testing the waters" you might want to stop there- the minisplit will be ~4000$, totally worth it if you intend to stay for a few years, but i don't think it adds to the resale value because people are not familiar with them. in an open plan situation i wouldn't bother trying to tie it into the existing ducts, again keeping costs low if you are testing the waters. despite dana1's excellent calculations, you might also want to consider undersizing the unit slightly as i did- the rls9 is more efficient than the rls12. while initially it might not keep up fully, you have the wood stove to make up the difference, and then air sealing improvements can often drastically reduce the heat load of a structure. my house was initially a summer house and air sealing was not even considered. any part time use house built when energy costs were lower will be similar. you will be amazed at the dramatic difference a tighter envelope makes. i can't believe the difference just a tighter front door makes for the heat in my place. now, for that jalousie window in the living room and the 1/4 in gap between ceiling drywall and wall in the kitchen... as for the crawl space, consider looking for rolled vinyl flooring- used, shortends, scraps- far more robust than 6 mil poly (uh, it's flooring!) if you need to be accessing the crawlspace semi regularly. to sum it up: minisplit and EPA woodstove for the win!
|
|
|
|
|
upstatepuzzle
 New Member
 Posts:3
 |
| 13 Dec 2017 12:19 AM |
|
small, hot fires in an EPA woodstove won't give you creosote. i have a jotul f100, bought used for $400 iirc, is a very small stove (they say it heats up to 100ft²-that must be a newly built, tight, insulated 1000 square feet!) no smoke comes out of it except a tiny bit at start up. (or if i try burning from the thoroughly dry pile of spruce branch cuttings that are mostly bark. bark=smoke. lesson learned). for me, pollution is a bigger concern than creosote, but the two go hand in hand. for low heating loads, once i get it up to temp i let it burn down to coals and then add small pieces of wood rather than big loads. even with a bigger load turned down low, as long as i don't let it smoulder there is no visible smoke coming out of the chimney. i accept it will not give me the all night burn that my hillbilly neighbor tries to get while filling the neighborhood with acrid smoke, but i have an electric radiator to keep the house warm enough until i can start the stove up in the morning... and when i replace that radiator with a minisplit i expect my comfort to rise while my electric bills drop drastically. |
|
|
|
|
SciGuy
 New Member
 Posts:33
 |
| 13 Dec 2017 01:19 AM |
|
Thanks for the many insightful additions to an already productive thread. I'm still hesitant on a wood stove as I just hate the monster heat sucking chimney system that would go along with it. I'll have to post a picture as it's one of those things that has to be seen to be believed. I could imagine a team of scientists sitting around discussing "now how can we conduct absolutely the most heat possible out of this structure?" So I really want to tear that sucker down and fill in the space left with a nicely insulated wall. The Fujitsu is attractive. I contacted the two installers within 50 miles of me an one doesn't work this for out and the other is working in Utah now. So that's a hurdle to get over too.
Thanks for the idea of vinyl in the crawl space. It certainly would beat bare moist soil. The former owners who were also the builders have the downspouts from the eve troughs coming straight down right next to the foundation with no effort to direct the water away. It's quite mind boggling. why they did some things they did.
We'll learn a lot this first winter and with luck will turn this into a reasonable place to heat.
Kind regards,
Hugh
|
|
|
|
|
upstatepuzzle
 New Member
 Posts:3
 |
| 13 Dec 2017 11:40 AM |
|
I've got one better than the downspouts.... in one of my houses they ran the heating distribution copper pipe through the slab. at some point i discovered i was pumping hot water under the slab. the boiler was ancient and rusty and i decided to replace the whole system with the minisplit. then we had the polar vortex winter, and i had not yet put on place all the planned envelope upgrades and my tenant reported being very cold.... the uninsulated slab on grade of that house functions similarly to your stone chimney as a massive heat sink. but you should be able to run single-wall stove pipe quite close to it and up to where you switch to double wall to go through the roof, then when/if you get around to demolishing the chimney you've lost nothing and gained heat and comfort. that's a drag about the minisplit installers, but you might apply that money to envelope upgrades that could potentially produce big efficiency improvements. i don't know much about propane heat, but intuitively it doesn't seem right that combustion air is drawn from the house. that would seem to place the house under negative pressure, drawing in cold air. gaps around doors windows and behind mouldings can add up to the equivalent of a window being open, intensified that much more if you are creating a negative pressure situation. insulation is great but if you keep a window open (or its equivalent) it won't keep you nearly as warm as it should. best of luck! |
|
|
|
|
Dana1
 Senior Member
 Posts:6991
 |
| 13 Dec 2017 07:54 PM |
|
Posted By SciGuy on 12 Dec 2017 11:20 PM
More excellent feedback! Perhaps the locals are attempting to strike terror into our hearts. If you have a heating history on this place it's possible to estimate the heat as-is heat load by fuel consumption. Exact fill-up dates & quantities during a winter period during which the place was continuously heated would be the most accurate. The methods for the napkin-math (it's OK to use a spreadsheet tool :-) ) are spelled out here: It looks like we used 2/80 of the 200 gallon capacity over the past three days to keep the cabin at at ~ 60*F. So that's ~ 5 gallons X 91,333 BTUs/ gallon X .8 (?) /72 hours or about 5100 BTUs per hour to hold the cabin at ~ 60*F. I realize that's too short a time for precision especially in light of the propane tanks gauge granularity but it at least gives and an order of magnitude based on the furnace having an 80% efficient. I'll send my diminutive gal pal into the craw space to get its particulars. The weather has varied from low teens at night to just bumping 32*F today. I bet i can get the approximate heating degree days from a reasonable source. That appear to be in line with your back of the napkin math. I'm timing the furnace duty time as I sit here with it 25*F outside and 60*F inside and see ~4 minutes on and 16 off or about 20% How small did they make those furnaces? As a backup (or even primary) heating system it might be better to put a small (<35,000 BTU) wood stove or fireplace insert rather than a pellet stove, on the basis that wood stoves don't need power to operate, whereas mini-splits and pellet stoves do. A wood stove with a bit of thermal mass such as a soapstone or ceramic type would be able to keep a 600' cabin from turning into a sauna. When the local grid goes down in a howling winter storm it makes a difference! A wood stove is attractive for the reason you mentioned but I worry that running one at a low burn long term for the low load would be an invitation for creosote production and chimney fires. Been there, done that and it's way too exciting. Might a small kerosene heater with 10 or 15 gallons in reserve might make for a cost effective power out heat source for a few days of power out? The chimney on the cabin is external to the living space and is well thermally coupled to that space by the 8' X 5' fire place. If one was attempting to build a way to lose heat from a structure they'd be well served to copy this double flue monstrosity/ If we decide to stay here it's being torn down. Thanks so much fr you well reason help. Hugh
The temperature outdoors varied by quite a bit over those few days. Don't guess- find a local weather station on degreedays.net, (KNYCONST7 on Highmarket road is probably good enough, but there are several others) and download the daily heating degree-day data using a base temperature about 5F below your indoor temperature (Ef you were keeping the place at 60F, use base 55F.)
Then from the BTU/gallon and furnace efficiency, figure out how many BTUs per heating degree-day were used, and divide by 24 hours to derive the BTUs per degree-hour it takes to heat the house. This is the key linear heating constant by which you can estimate the load at any arbitrary outdoor temperature.
Then note that if you want to heat the place to 70F the heating/cooling balance point will be about 65F, and if the local 99% outside design temp is -5F (about right), it means you have 65F-(-5F) = 70F heating degrees.
So the heat load at -5F will be about (your derived BTU/degree-hour heating constant) x 70F. The heat load at -15F will be (heating constant) x 80F.
The error over time periods as short as three days is pretty high, even IF you had better accuracy on the fuel meter. It's easier to use fill-up dates & volumes, and more accurate over periods of 50 winter days or more. |
|
|
|
|
SciGuy
 New Member
 Posts:33
 |
| 13 Dec 2017 10:06 PM |
|
Posted By Dana1 on 13 Dec 2017 07:54 PM
Posted By SciGuy on 12 Dec 2017 11:20 PM
More excellent feedback! Perhaps the locals are attempting to strike terror into our hearts. If you have a heating history on this place it's possible to estimate the heat as-is heat load by fuel consumption. Exact fill-up dates & quantities during a winter period during which the place was continuously heated would be the most accurate. The methods for the napkin-math (it's OK to use a spreadsheet tool :-) ) are spelled out here: It looks like we used 2/80 of the 200 gallon capacity over the past three days to keep the cabin at at ~ 60*F. So that's ~ 5 gallons X 91,333 BTUs/ gallon X .8 (?) /72 hours or about 5100 BTUs per hour to hold the cabin at ~ 60*F. I realize that's too short a time for precision especially in light of the propane tanks gauge granularity but it at least gives and an order of magnitude based on the furnace having an 80% efficient. I'll send my diminutive gal pal into the craw space to get its particulars. The weather has varied from low teens at night to just bumping 32*F today. I bet i can get the approximate heating degree days from a reasonable source. That appear to be in line with your back of the napkin math. I'm timing the furnace duty time as I sit here with it 25*F outside and 60*F inside and see ~4 minutes on and 16 off or about 20% How small did they make those furnaces? As a backup (or even primary) heating system it might be better to put a small (<35,000 BTU) wood stove or fireplace insert rather than a pellet stove, on the basis that wood stoves don't need power to operate, whereas mini-splits and pellet stoves do. A wood stove with a bit of thermal mass such as a soapstone or ceramic type would be able to keep a 600' cabin from turning into a sauna. When the local grid goes down in a howling winter storm it makes a difference! A wood stove is attractive for the reason you mentioned but I worry that running one at a low burn long term for the low load would be an invitation for creosote production and chimney fires. Been there, done that and it's way too exciting. Might a small kerosene heater with 10 or 15 gallons in reserve might make for a cost effective power out heat source for a few days of power out? The chimney on the cabin is external to the living space and is well thermally coupled to that space by the 8' X 5' fire place. If one was attempting to build a way to lose heat from a structure they'd be well served to copy this double flue monstrosity/ If we decide to stay here it's being torn down. Thanks so much fr you well reason help. Hugh
The temperature outdoors varied by quite a bit over those few days. Don't guess- find a local weather station on degreedays.net, (KNYCONST7 on Highmarket road is probably good enough, but there are several others) and download the daily heating degree-day data using a base temperature about 5F below your indoor temperature (Ef you were keeping the place at 60F, use base 55F.)
Then from the BTU/gallon and furnace efficiency, figure out how many BTUs per heating degree-day were used, and divide by 24 hours to derive the BTUs per degree-hour it takes to heat the house. This is the key linear heating constant by which you can estimate the load at any arbitrary outdoor temperature.
Then note that if you want to heat the place to 70F the heating/cooling balance point will be about 65F, and if the local 99% outside design temp is -5F (about right), it means you have 65F-(-5F) = 70F heating degrees.
So the heat load at -5F will be about (your derived BTU/degree-hour heating constant) x 70F. The heat load at -15F will be (heating constant) x 80F.
The error over time periods as short as three days is pretty high, even IF you had better accuracy on the fuel meter. It's easier to use fill-up dates & volumes, and more accurate over periods of 50 winter days or more.
Well now we're cooking with gas;) I do so appreciate your experience and wisdom. So here's a small chunk of data that begins to get at a more measured result: From December 5th to the 12th there were 233.1 heating degree days at Highmarket on a 55*F base temperature. Over the course of those days the fuel level dropped from 60% to 55% so 5/80 of 200 gallons or ~ 12.5 gallons. 12.5 X 91,333 = 1141662.5 BTU X .8 and I'm guessing here efficiency factor wise = 913330 BTUs given to the house over those 233.1 degree days = 3918 BTU/DD or 163 BTU/ Degree Hour So during a -15*F cold period there would be a demand for 80 X 163 = 13,060 BTU/ hour to keep the structure at 65*F How's my math look? Obviously the precision of the propane tank gauge and the difference between Highmarket temperatures and those of John Street will impact their accuracy but we're getting closer. They just were topped off the propane today so going forward I ought to be able to make a much more precise estimate of actual usage. On an unsettling note, I watched i complete horror as icicles formed and grew off the roof on a day with temperatures never leaving the low teens and no sun. The roof is nearly in need of being redone so it would seem to be the prefect time to install a thick layer of recycled sheet insulation. It's a very simple roof layout that I would think would be perfect for such an upgrade. What do you think of a little direct vent through the wall propane heater as an emergency back up heat source? Thanks for all the guidance. Hugh |
|
|
|
|
SciGuy
 New Member
 Posts:33
 |
| 14 Dec 2017 08:06 PM |
|
It's important to provide some links to the fabled heat sucking chimney in the thread lest folks feel I exaggerated a bit.
http://i68.tinypic.com/ok3eic.jpg
http://i68.tinypic.com/jg49ag.jpg
http://i68.tinypic.com/28uphtd.jpg
There are icicles actively forming as this 14*F picture was taken. Insulation levels in the roof are obviously not up to snuff. Thoughts on installing sheet insulation during the reroof to a metal roof are appreciated.
Thanks all for your insights.
Hugh
|
|
|
|
|
Dana1
 Senior Member
 Posts:6991
 |
| 14 Dec 2017 10:53 PM |
|
If you're really designing for an outside design temp of -15F heating only with a single-head mini-split only, you're looking at the Fujitsu 15RLS3YH, which will deliver ~15,000 BTU/hr (max) at -15F (tested for efficiency modulating at 18,000 BTU/hr out at both +17F and +47F for the HSPF ratings): http://orders.sidharvey.com/IMAGES/specs/ASU15RLS3Y.pdf But the 12RLS3YH would still cover the load at -5F (which is more likely to be your 99% outside design temp)- you can run the wood stove or pellet stove or turn on a small electric space heater when the temps are expected to hit negative double-digits. One you get rid of that heat-sucking chimney (what a thing of beauty! :-) ) it will be more appropriately sized for the -15F load than the 15RLS3YH too: http://www.fujitsugeneral.com/us/resources/pdf/support/downloads/submittal-sheets/12RLS3H.pdf Regarding rooftop foam, how deep are the rafters, again?
|
|
|
|
|
SciGuy
 New Member
 Posts:33
 |
| 19 Dec 2017 05:33 PM |
|
Posted By Dana1 on 14 Dec 2017 10:53 PM
If you're really designing for an outside design temp of -15F heating only with a single-head mini-split only, you're looking at the Fujitsu 15RLS3YH, which will deliver ~15,000 BTU/hr (max) at -15F (tested for efficiency modulating at 18,000 BTU/hr out at both +17F and +47F for the HSPF ratings): http://orders.sidharvey.com/IMAGES/specs/ASU15RLS3Y.pdf But the 12RLS3YH would still cover the load at -5F (which is more likely to be your 99% outside design temp)- you can run the wood stove or pellet stove or turn on a small electric space heater when the temps are expected to hit negative double-digits. One you get rid of that heat-sucking chimney (what a thing of beauty! :-) ) it will be more appropriately sized for the -15F load than the 15RLS3YH too: http://www.fujitsugeneral.com/us/resources/pdf/support/downloads/submittal-sheets/12RLS3H.pdf Regarding rooftop foam, how deep are the rafters, again?
I couldn't believe it but I'm now convinced that the rafters are only 2 X 6s which blows my mind. There's no apparent venting at the eves for the cathedral ceiling while there is a small vented attic area so there's potential for there to be a draw of moisture from the house into the ceiling insulation via the easy exit out the mini attic. I'd think it would be an excellent situation to add exterior sheet insulation at the time of reroofing with a metal rood after the monster chimney is torn down.
Thanks again for all the very useful comments. Enjoy the holiday season,
Hugh
|
|
|
|
|
| You are not authorized to post a reply. |
|
Active Forums 4.1
 |
Membership: |
 |
Latest:
croccohvacusa |
 |
New Today:
0 |
 |
New Yesterday:
0 |
 |
Overall:
35027 |
 |
People Online: |
 |
Visitors:
156 |
 |
Members:
0 |
 |
Total:
156 |
|
|
|