Indirect Water Heater?
Last Post 01 Dec 2010 10:17 AM by Dana1. 4 Replies.
Printer Friendly
Sort:
PrevPrev NextNext
You are not authorized to post a reply.
Author Messages
woksawiUser is Offline
Basic Member
Basic Member
Send Private Message
Posts:116

--
30 Nov 2010 05:00 PM
We have a 2 floor, 2900 sf house with radiant heating in concrete on both floors.  The house is ALL ELECTRIC.  We're about to buy an Allied Electric Boiler, and were trying to pick out an electric water heater.  The owner of the HVAC company we're using said NOT to use an indirect water heater, but his guy working on the job said it's a no brainer to use one. 

Which is correct? 

For regular water heaters, the following were recommend:

- Rheem Marathon (but this is lined with polybutylene and being sensitive, not sure I want that where the water is being stored - we have pex pipes throughout house, but I see a difference between where water will be stored versus where it will run through fast...)

- Regular Rheem Water Heater

- Bradford White

Any recommendations either way?  (indirect/direct, glass lined vs polybutylene, brand?)
jonrUser is Offline
Senior Member
Senior Member
Send Private Message
Posts:5341

--
30 Nov 2010 08:14 PM
I take it that geothermal, heat pumps and natural gas are not being considered?
woksawiUser is Offline
Basic Member
Basic Member
Send Private Message
Posts:116

--
30 Nov 2010 10:10 PM
No natural gas in that area, propane is expensive and fluctuates but most importantly, I'm super sensitive to it, and eventually we do want geo or solar but can't afford upfront costs right now because of construction problems that have occurred.  We also want to see, with AAC construction, and tons of insulation, what the first year will really be like...
ClarkUser is Offline
Basic Member
Basic Member
Send Private Message
Posts:248

--
01 Dec 2010 09:39 AM
With a natural gas boiler, an indirect water heater would be the best choice. I have a 40 gal Bradford White and am more than satisfied with its performance (standby losses, recovery time.) For an electric boiler, I'm not so sure. There likely would be greater heat losses in an indirect DHW setup. Have you compared the up front costs?
Dana1User is Offline
Senior Member
Senior Member
Send Private Message
Posts:6991

--
01 Dec 2010 10:17 AM
What you get with an indirect and a electric boiler with the indirect set up as a priority zone is MUCH faster recovery times. If the electric boiler is big enough it's pretty much an endless hot water deal, just like an on-demand tankless.

If combined with a drainwater heat recovery heat exchanger even a modestly sized electric boiler puts out enough for endless showers (but no change in tub-fill rates- the drain has to be flowing at the same time as the water flow to get the benefit.)
You are not authorized to post a reply.

Active Forums 4.1
Membership Membership: Latest New User Latest: croccohvacusa New Today New Today: 0 New Yesterday New Yesterday: 0 User Count Overall: 35027
People Online People Online: Visitors Visitors: 158 Members Members: 0 Total Total: 158
Copyright 2011 by BuildCentral, Inc.   Terms Of Use  Privacy Statement