Posted By ICFconstruction on 12 Sep 2011 01:19 PM
How much of a difference does location make with galvanized vs Galvalume and radiant barrier insulation? I am in MN.
I am not quite cheap, but I will quit being cheap when I have more money. Isn't galvanized brighter and more variegated in appearance?
In California under CA Title 24 rules they specify a minimum solar reflectivity & infra-red emissivity, that can be used calculate a min ASTM E1980 solar reflective index (SRI) for roofing materials depending on local climate zone and roof pitch. The most stringent is for low slope (2:12 or lower) roofs, which requires a min initial reflectivity of 0.7, and emissivity of 0.75 (which ends up being an SRI of 82). For steep roofs (>2:12) made of lower-mass materails they use minimum 3 year aged numbers for reflectivity & emissivity of 0.2 and 0.75 respectively resulting in a relatively low SRI of 11. Cement, slate, or tile roofs of a specified minimum mass get a break even from that, needing only an aged reflectivity of 0.15, emissivity 0.75 which is calculates to an SRI of 4 (!).
Where the builder/owner wants to use a material with an SRI lower than the min-spec, one of their options is to install interior radiant barrier. No matter where you are, an exterior finish with a greater than 40 will meet or beat the thermal performance of rafter-mounted radiant barrier under a high-absorption high-pitch vented roof, and anything over 30 is actually pretty good.
The initial SRIs of various Galvalume colors are listed on the last page in
this document.
Under CA Title 24 they have other options for steep roofs too :
• Use of R-0.85 insulation or a ¾” air space added to the roof deck over the attic space, or,
• Insulating and sealing existing air conditioning ducts in the attic space in accordance with Section 151(f)10, or,
• Buildings with no air conditioning ducts in the attic (do not require cool roofs), or
• In zones 10, 12, or 13, providing ventilation of at least 1 sq.ft of free ventilation per 150 sq.ft. of attic floor space and where
at least 30% of the ventilation is within 2 feet of the ridge, or,
• Having a minimum of R-30 ceiling insulation, or,
• Installing a radiant barrier that meets the requirements of Section 151(f)2, or,
• In zones 10, 11, 13, or 14, having a minimum R-3 deck insulation above a vented attic
Given that a code-min home in MN has more than R30 in the attic (IIRC R49 is code min in most of the state), and most don't have attic mounted ducts outside the insulation, the thermal benefits of Galvalume or r.b. will likely be "in the noise", but if it isn't costing extra to go for a higher SRI, it's a "why not" situation.
In most cases a code-min home in Minneapolis would save less than $5/year on utilities with rafter mounted r.b.(!). See the table on p.5- particularly the "no ducts" row at the bottom, as well as the no-ducts table on p.6:
http://www.ornl.gov/sci/ees/etsd/bt...et2010.pdfThat's about the return you'd get on a cool roof material with an SRI north of 30 too, so don't go TOO hog-wild on it, eh? If you like two colors equally and one has a higher SRI you might let that tip the balance, but don't lose any sleep over taking the darker colors with sub-30 SRIs if you like 'em better