Posted By kogashuko on 13 Jul 2013 11:27 PM
Read that and a few others. I think what I am going to do is have the rigid foam on the bottom of the rafters and have the cellulose between the roof and foam. This way the rigid foam will control the house moisture from entering the cellulose and the ridge vent will still allow drying.
To be code legal and to avoid punky roof decking you'll need a minimum of 1.5" air channel (2" is better) between the roof deck and the cellulose. Cellulose is fairly air retardent, and while it would wick moisture from the roof deck (moderately protective, in moderate climates) it renders the soffit-to-ridge venting useless.
In sufficiently moderate or warm climates you can get away with simply dense-packing the cellulose against the roof deck, as long as the rigid foam you have on the interior is semi-permeable (2" of EPS would be fine, but foil faced goods of any type would not.) More on unvented approaches
here. Take note of table 3.
There are some cellulose vendors (notably National Fiber) who claim that dense packing cellulose to ~4lbs density in unvented rafter bays is adequate on it's own even in zones 5 & 6, but it doesn't simulate as very safe using WUFI. Similarly there are those claiming half-pound foam works fine on it's own everywhere too, but that isn't borne out in the series of simulations in that RR-1001 paper.
But with 2-3" of Type-II or Type-IX EPS on the interior you would have a fairly stiff class-III (but not class-II) vapor retarder on the interior, and with full-depth cellulose plenty of seasonal moisture buffering capacity, which should work fine in most of the lower-48. You probably won't want to go below 0.5 perms or above 3 perms on the foam layer in any lower-48 climate, but the colder the climate, the lower permeance you'd need.