|
|
|
Choosing an ICF Supplier for Lake Tahoe Ca Build
|
Sort:
|
|
Prev Next |
You are not authorized to post a reply. |
|
steve burke
 New Member
 Posts:26
 |
| 02 Feb 2013 10:16 AM |
|
Hi, We are building (3300 conditioned space, not all "living") in Olympic Valley (aka Squaw Valley) Ca -- alpine conditions. The lot is a downslope of ~ 25%, we will have a walkout "basement" (one bedroom/bath) and two living floors above. The top floor will be at the same level as the street.
We are considering ICF, and will appreciate any insights from you all in terms of selecting an ICF supplier (how do costs compare? or cost/sq ft of wall), number of people requried to efficiently set blocks and rebar (I will contract out the footings & slabs), the place concrete (expect at least three pours, one for each level).
Finally, we plan to use a local civil engineer for the plans but understand from some posts that this may be more costly than using an ICF engineer -- comments here will be helpful.
Many thanks, Steve |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ICFHybrid
 Veteran Member
 Posts:3039
 |
| 02 Feb 2013 11:10 AM |
|
Really interesting project. I think ICF would make a comfy alpine build. For example: could it be built avalanche-resistant? Inquiring minds want to know. :-) I'm not sure why a regular civil engineer would be more expensive than an "ICF Engineer", unless you are talking about a non-licensed "engineer" who would design your place to the "ICF Cookbook" prescription. |
|
|
|
|
steve burke
 New Member
 Posts:26
 |
| 02 Feb 2013 01:01 PM |
|
Thanks for you post ICFHyrid. Regarding the engineering calcs, some of my recent bids have had an adder for ICF. My take is that the ICF industry has CAD/Engineering Details that are readily available and do not need to be recalced by the project engineer..this is just a waste of money paid by the homeowner.
Instead, the project engineer should make use of the expertise of the ICF engineering that has already been done. Using readily available standard from the ICF community can bring down the "engineering adder" for ICF and make it more competitive with stick.
That said, perhaps you can give me some insight on why the price for ICF seems to be high. In my simple minded calculations i see pricing for a single 2" 4x8 sheet of eps $24 that gives about 75 cents/sq foot. Note that this is price for one sheet (just googled it) and if i was buying a housefull, i would expect to save ~15% simply on the volume.
Given an ICF that is roughly 4.25" think, 4' long, 12" tall, one "block" is approximately equivalent to half a sheet (actual is 0.53 if you calculate by volume). That means that in terms of EPS material, one "block" should have $12 of EPS in it (note that this is for two sides at 4.25" each). In rough terms this is $3/sq foot for eps.
Clearly this does not include the added cost of manufacturing, the plastic ties in the form, but it also does not capture the fact that the manufacturing equipment for ICF is probably fully depreciated by now, and when buying ICF you are ordering a truckload (i.e. there should be a volume benefit).
As far as avalanche resistance, this should be an intrinsic benefit of ICF (along with standard detail) that i can use that might lower my overall engineering expense and motivation to go ICF. If you know where i can find a standard detail from the ICF manufacturers, i will be more than happy to include it.
I'd like to hear other thoughts on this, including where my logic may be flawed. Thanks, Steve |
|
|
|
|
sailawayrb
 Veteran Member
 Posts:2283

 |
| 02 Feb 2013 02:07 PM |
|
If your building is fairly conventional, I would say that conventional ICF build is likely adequate. However, in the end it really depends on what your city/county building department has to say about it. We just designed an ICF two building home site (1800 SF rambler plus detached garage/shop with 400 SF guest living space). Because the design was passive solar (i.e., larger than normal passive solar roof overhangs which result in higher than normal lateral wind loads), higher than normal walls, larger than normal headers for larger than normal south wall fenestration, and seismic D1, we had to have the concrete rebar schedule engineered. Cost was less than $1K for the entire concrete design (floor slabs, masonry heater slab, stem walls, ICF walls, truss fasteners, etc) to have both building designs stamped by a structural civil PE. Relative to ICF cost, I tend to agree. Seems like $12/SF is a common rate and that seems way high to me too. I reckon we will just have to wait for the Chinese products to arrive and allow supply/demand economics to prevail. |
|
| Borst Engineering & Construction LLC - Competence, Integrity and Professionalism are integral to all that we do! |
|
|
steve burke
 New Member
 Posts:26
 |
| 02 Feb 2013 02:37 PM |
|
Our project is on a 25% downslope, but we tried to keep things as simple as possible. That said, we have endeavored to keep a single gable across house (58' deep, 36' wide, max ht is 43' from bottom of footing to top of roof. house is ~3300 sq ft of conditioned (not necessarily living) space. Seismic zone 3.
Can you please advise on your selecteion rationale for your ICF supplier....we are sorting through our criteria and top of mind is cost given the relatively large square footage of exterior walls. if at all possible, providing a rough cost per sq foot of wall will be enormously helpful. Thanks, Steve |
|
|
|
|
sailawayrb
 Veteran Member
 Posts:2283

 |
| 02 Feb 2013 02:50 PM |
|
There are so many factors that affect ICF manufacturer selection (your location relatiive to the available product and your available installers experienced with the selected product perhaps being critical factors), it is a highly debatable subject, and frankly we are not experts in this area to really provide definitive recommendations. However, I am sure that there are members of this forum that can provide you some guidance/recommendations. |
|
| Borst Engineering & Construction LLC - Competence, Integrity and Professionalism are integral to all that we do! |
|
|
BrucePolycrete
 Advanced Member
 Posts:524
 |
| 02 Feb 2013 05:25 PM |
|
Steve, Regarding the cost of ICF vs sheet EPS: EPS sheets are a generic material. They can be Type I density, Type II or other densities. ICFs are an engineered concrete form. They are always at least Type II or stronger. ICFs also must pass a litany of rigorous tests with regard to EPS strength, both flexural and compressive. The tie/fastener system must pass other tests such as screw pull, etc. These tests are required to be performed by a third party testing service and they cost hundreds of thousands of dollars. In addition to the third party testing, reputable ICF manufacturers have continuous programs of research and development. This R&D infrastructure also costs money, and results in improvements to the products on the market. Then you have marketing costs. ICF manufacturers spend a fortune on marketing. Generic EPs molders don’t. They have a trade group that does marketing and the product is generally understood by the A/E and construction community. The product performs in a predictable way day in and day out and there is little product differentiation between EPS sheet/block molders. The ICF industry on the other hand spends an exorbitant amount of money educating the A/E community and builders. They regularly conduct seminars and training events. ICFs are not well understood and began life under a cloud. In the early years, bad products, deceptive salespeople and a misguided marketing approach led to many failed installations and black eyes to the industry. There are (at least) three tiers of ICF manufacturers. There are low level products that just meet the ICC (building code) requirements. There are others that generally do a passable job for building basic structures but can be quirky and require a really talented installer to result in a good straight and plumb wall. Then there are the top tier ICFs that are successfully used to build large multi-story commercial buildings. The low cost products are typically the low quality ones. You’re on this forum, so you’re doing the homework. The biggest hurdle you will have is to find a top flight installer. Let your installer pick the product he likes best and is most familiar with. The best installers use the best products. An experienced and well regarded installer is the key to your successful ICF project. Due diligence is the watchword. Interview your installer and check his references. Good luck.
PS: Don't hold your breath waiting for Chinese ICFs. Shipping cost is too high, Chinese labor costs are rising fast and US energy prices are dropping like a rock. Manufacturing's hot new scheme is "Re-shoring". |
|
|
|
|
steve burke
 New Member
 Posts:26
 |
| 02 Feb 2013 08:09 PM |
|
Thanks for the perspective. That said, while i have been trying to convince my architect and builder of the merits of ICF, both have been telling me of the significant cost downside. We are quickly reaching the point in my project where i have to decide in order to do the engineering...your outline of the cost adders of ICF appear significant. Unfortunately, it looks like the architect and builder may be right, and this is not likely to be in the budget for our program. Appreciate the information. Alas.
|
|
|
|
|
ICFHybrid
 Veteran Member
 Posts:3039
 |
| 02 Feb 2013 08:24 PM |
|
this is just a waste of money paid by the homeowner. It doesn't have to be a waste of money. My engineer earned his entire fee by making certain changes that saved money in the long run. For example, we had been talking about 8" walls due to the height, but engineering allowed us to drop back to 6". We also built out with ICF in the basement which afforded us some special rooms (wine cellar, cold storage, etc) and still saved money on the overall engineering due to the bracing and support effects. My engineering bids ran from $2,500 all the way up to another outlier at $12-$14,000. Don't take the outliers. We got it done for $4500 or so. I think the stick frame engineering package would have been about $3000 anyway. Looks like you have a slope, snow loading and some seismic going, so that is pushing you out of the norm right there. The ICF industry is forced to make comparisons to stick frame because that is what everyone knows. It really isn't a comparable product and there will be some additional cost due to the additional features you get. I'm thinking about strength (seismic resistance), airtightness, sound resistance and thermal mass here, not to mention that when the walls are up the insulation is done. My walls are bulletproof, too. :-) Somewhere, there is a video of an SUV running off the road, smack into an ICF home and you can see the homeowner complaining (to the insurance company) that the concrete is chipped on one corner and that the siding will have to be repaired. If the additional features have no meaning to you, there are a lot of other types of green building that would work, but I would go after an alpine ICF home. Because most contractors are very leery of "losing their shirt" on a job, you probably won't find too many cheap incompetent ICF builders, but that doesn't rule out the possibility of some inexperienced moron giving it a shot on the lowball. What I found is that the more efficient they were, the cheaper they were. I had some sky high bids and I took the lowest one who came well recommended and had a very large amount of experience. He was an excellent performer. Worked hard and well and that's how he kept the cost down. PS, your EPS equivalent calculations may be a bit off if you used a form height of 12", as they are typically 16", and the foam thickness is a bit more than 2". I think it was 2-3/8" on the ARXX forms I used. |
|
|
|
|
Alton
 Veteran Member
 Posts:2164
 |
| 02 Feb 2013 08:28 PM |
|
Steve, Are shotcrete panels and stucco workers available in your area. If so, then get a quote for shotcrete panels and installation. This is not ICF but may still meet your needs. |
|
Residential Designer & Construction Technology Consultant -- E-mail: Alton at Auburn dot Edu Use email format with @ and period . 334 826-3979 |
|
|
Lbear
 Veteran Member
 Posts:2740

 |
| 03 Feb 2013 12:27 AM |
|
Posted By steve burke on 02 Feb 2013 08:09 PM
Thanks for the perspective. That said, while i have been trying to convince my architect and builder of the merits of ICF, both have been telling me of the significant cost downside. We are quickly reaching the point in my project where i have to decide in order to do the engineering...your outline of the cost adders of ICF appear significant. Unfortunately, it looks like the architect and builder may be right, and this is not likely to be in the budget for our program. Appreciate the information. Alas.
If your architect is not familiar with ICF, then it will be natural for them to NOT want to deal with designing it and they will naturally try and sway you away from it. Of course it will be natural for the builder to sway you on not using ICF because he is not familiar with it. If your builder isn't an ICF builder, do NOT use him for ICF. Do you want him learning on how to do ICF on your home? With ICF, you will get a upfront flat cost from the ICF contractor and this will be for the complete ICF wall structure (ICF's, stacking, rebar, concrete, labor, window bucks, door bucks, etc). When all is said and done, you will have a completed wall structure that is ready for exterior stucco or interior drywall. Stick frame homes involve a lot more trades to get a finished wall assembly that ICF walls don't. As you will soon find out, the devils in the details when it comes to building "energy homes" and there are more "details" AKA - $$$ in stick frame builds. ICF
costs are measured in square foot of wall area while stick frame
costs are measured in square foot of floor area. NAHB did a study and they concluded that ICF homes cost about 5% more than wood framed wall homes. US Dept of Housing Study |
|
|
|
|
ICFHybrid
 Veteran Member
 Posts:3039
 |
| 03 Feb 2013 09:51 AM |
|
while i have been trying to convince my architect and builder of the merits of ICF Like Lbear said, that is an uphill battle. I started with an architect who designed for ICF and when I solicited contractors with the planset, every one of the first half dozen I visited, said they did ICF, but then tried to turn it to a conventional build once I was sitting in the office with a cup of coffee. |
|
|
|
|
Chris Johnson
 Advanced Member
 Posts:878
 |
| 03 Feb 2013 01:54 PM |
|
Ed Zweigle is right there, he is a distributor and can set you up with Designers and Builders if needed XXX-XXX-XXXX (Phone #s and e-mail addresses are not allowed in forum posts)
|
|
| Chris Johnson - Pro ICF<br>North of 49 |
|
|
IcfKent
 New Member
 Posts:1
 |
| 10 Oct 2013 07:30 PM |
|
Try Performance Wall Systems they do a lot of jobs in Northern Ca and NV
They sell Arxx, Logix and Fox block and have contacts for design and construction. |
|
|
|
|
TerryGrayson
 New Member
 Posts:1
 |
| 22 Nov 2013 12:09 AM |
|
Hi Steve Burke If you have yet to pick a builder we have built dozens of ICF buildings and Residential Homes and will be beginning one in May again in your area. If you'd like to discuss ICF suppliers and us as a potential builder please give me a call. Terry L. Grayson Foundation Homes Your DREAM, Our REPUTATION XXX-XXX-XXXX (Phone #s and e-mail addresses are not allowed in forum posts)
|
|
|
|
|
| You are not authorized to post a reply. |
|
Active Forums 4.1
 |
Membership: |
 |
Latest:
croccohvacusa |
 |
New Today:
0 |
 |
New Yesterday:
0 |
 |
Overall:
35027 |
 |
People Online: |
 |
Visitors:
203 |
 |
Members:
0 |
 |
Total:
203 |
|
|
|