New ASHRAE Building Science Article on Thermal Mass
Last Post 03 May 2014 03:24 PM by jonr. 1 Replies.
Printer Friendly
Sort:
PrevPrev NextNext
You are not authorized to post a reply.
Author Messages
LbearUser is Offline
Veteran Member
Veteran Member
Send Private Message
Posts:2740
Avatar

--
03 May 2014 11:35 AM
New study was released in December 2013:

The building industry is continually moving toward higher insulation levels and continuous insulation. Many building codes and standards recognize that thermally massive buildings need less insulation because they can store and gradually release heat compared to lightweight metal or wood-framed buildings. This relative reduction in required minimum insulation values for a massive building compared to a lightweight building varies by climate, but in general, ASHRAE Standard 90.1 allows about a 30% reduction in insulation levels. California's energy code allows up to an 86% reduction in insulation levels for "mass heavy" walls in certain climate zones.

However, most state building codes and energy standards do not currently reflect whether the thermal mass is located on the interior or exterior side of the insulation in the wall system. Also, the building type, geometry, window-to-wall ratio, and internal loads are not considered with respect to thermal mass in the prescriptive tables of ASHRAE 90.1 and various state energy codes. Our paper discusses the results of a series of whole-building energy simulations that we completed using the EnergyPlus computer program to study the effect of thermal mass relative to these parameters.

Our results show that the increased U-factors in the prescriptive tables in ASHRAE 90.1 and various state energy codes are justified in terms of accounting for the benefit of thermal mass. However, in all cases, having insulation on the exterior side of the thermal mass outperforms cases where the thermal mass is on the exterior side of the insulation.We show the most important parameters to maximize the benefit of thermal mass with regards to energy efficiency and demonstrate how the prescriptive tables in ASHRAE 90.1 and most state energy codes do not currently account for these benefits or parameters.

Presented at Thermal Performance of Exterior Envelopes of Whole Buildings XII, December 2013

Citation: Thermal Performance of Exterior Envelopes of Whole Buildings XII



Anyone out there with this study? It's probably worth the $15 to download but I am curious as to what it has to say about ICF.

jonrUser is Offline
Senior Member
Senior Member
Send Private Message
Posts:5341

--
03 May 2014 03:24 PM
However, in all cases, having insulation on the exterior side of the thermal mass outperforms cases where the thermal mass is on the exterior side of the insulation.


Sounds wrong in cases where you maintain the interior at a fixed temperature (no heat change to store) or where you use thermostat setback (thermal mass makes it less effective). And then there are all the practical issues of internal mass - having to open/close windows, condensation on the walls, air quality, etc.
You are not authorized to post a reply.

Active Forums 4.1
Membership Membership: Latest New User Latest: IntegratedHomes New Today New Today: 0 New Yesterday New Yesterday: 1 User Count Overall: 35026
People Online People Online: Visitors Visitors: 222 Members Members: 0 Total Total: 222
Copyright 2011 by BuildCentral, Inc.   Terms Of Use  Privacy Statement