Posted By sailawayrb on 04 Apr 2020 05:53 PM
https://dengarden.com/misc/The-Pitfalls-of-an-Underground-House
I dunno. I'd call this article "The Pitfalls Of A Badly Designed, Executed and Detailed Underground House."
The home in question here was designed with a mediocre grasp of the dynamics that was over a decade out of date when the home was built (during or after 1980).
Insufficient drainage. Fouled up site drainage implementation.
"Permanent" systems installs buried in the concrete walls.
Bituminous coating (normally used in basements) to water-seal a non-vertical surface, insuring that it'd eventually wash/scrub off.
Also, they're basically spitting distance of the New Madrid Fault and I suspect concrete domes aren't really thick enough for sub-surface application.
Looked at TerraDome's site. They have engineering docs. The crown of the dome is tapering in thickness a whopping 6", with nothing but #5 and #6 rebar supports.
On a 24-28' span.
I can see that cracking EASILY. Especially if you have 4-6 feet of fill on top of that.
Then, on some of them, they're chopping out the center and going with a skylight fixture...
I'm sure the 14' high ceilings are all well and good. But you now have to heat and cool the whole damn space. And it's all bare-faced concrete, inside and out!
I am NOT an engineer/architect by trade. Yet I can rattle off strategies to avoid these pitfalls without much effort.
As for remediation of the home in the article? It'd probably be cheaper to just implode the structure, excavate and start fresh. Thought there ARE possible remediation strategies. They're going to cost...