|
|
|
Electric vs Gas Water Heaters for DSH
Last Post 19 Sep 2008 11:55 AM by geodean. 26 Replies.
|
Sort:
|
|
Prev Next |
You are not authorized to post a reply. |
|
|
|
Bill Neukranz
 Veteran Member
 Posts:1103
 |
| 17 Sep 2008 09:51 PM |
|
Here's an update - now X axis covers 8 hours.
HW from direct-connected gas-fired HWH continues to drop steadily due to usage and thermal losses via HWH tank. HW temp is low enough at the moment, and DSH is running frequently enough at the moment, such that DSH is providing benefit at this time. Thus, HWH tstat hasn't turned on gas burner yet (I've got a gas on/off indicator that will show up as a black line).
I probably don't have the HWH's tstat turned down low enough to prevent reverse heat flow from the DSH water loop to the R410 gas loop after the HWH's burner turns off, but, we'll see.
The second chart shows the maximum temp the R410A refrigerant got to today. Looks to be about 124°.
Best regards,
Bill |
Attachment: InstantaneousDeSuperHeaterPerformance copy.jpg
|
Energy reduction & monitoring</br> American Energy Efficiencies, Inc - Dallas, TX <A href="http://www.americaneei.com"> (www.americaneei.com)</A></br> Example monitoring system: <A href="http://www.welserver.com/WEL0043"> www.welserver.com/WEL0043</A>
|
|
|
Bill Neukranz
 Veteran Member
 Posts:1103
 |
| 17 Sep 2008 10:12 PM |
|
Posted By engineer on 09/17/2008 5:54 PM That warm green line (and somewhat cooler orange line) suggests to me continuous loss of heat from HWH into DSH (and thus GSHP) whenever GSHP not running.
Why is green always relatively warm even when GSHP off? Is DSH circ pump running continuously? That would not be good. Cause could also be natural convection. The challenge here is to keep in mind that Domestic HW (red line) isn't flowing very often. A sudden spike upward of the red line signals Domestic HW flow. So far, in the chart above, other than minor HW flows for washing hands in a sink, there have been 2 hot showers. These correspond to the substantial drops for the DSH Input (green) line. This makes sense because the DSH Input is connected to Domestic CW input at the HWH. DSH pump only runs when GSHP runs, and is indicated by blue line. Below is a connection diagram that includes actual temp values, showing how DSH is supposed to work, I believe. Best regards, Bill |
Attachment: system.jpg
|
Energy reduction & monitoring</br> American Energy Efficiencies, Inc - Dallas, TX <A href="http://www.americaneei.com"> (www.americaneei.com)</A></br> Example monitoring system: <A href="http://www.welserver.com/WEL0043"> www.welserver.com/WEL0043</A>
|
|
|
joe.ami
 Veteran Member
 Posts:4377

 |
| 17 Sep 2008 10:44 PM |
|
This is an aside, but I don't see a mention of the fact that most R-410 systems are 2 stage and as a DSH provides 10% of BTU value on a good day, 2 stage units are at a terrific disadvantage. Operating cost software routinely points out that a single stage unit (most often R-22) makes up ground on hot water production (as I've mentioned costs projections are often less than $100 year apart in spite of greater efficiencies). Less waste, less leftover heat. J |
|
Joe Hardin www.amicontracting.com We Dig Comfort! www.doityourselfgeothermal.com Dig Your Own Comfort! |
|
|
Bill Neukranz
 Veteran Member
 Posts:1103
 |
| 17 Sep 2008 11:24 PM |
|
Posted By joe.ami on 09/17/2008 10:44 PM ... most R-410 systems are 2 stage and as a DSH provides 10% of BTU value on a good day, 2 stage units are at a terrific disadvantage. Operating cost software routinely points out that a single stage unit (most often R-22) makes up ground on hot water production (as I've mentioned costs projections are often less than $100 year apart in spite of greater efficiencies). Less waste, less leftover heat. J Not sure I understand all of these points, but for the points I do understand, I agree and think they're good points. My R410A system (WaterFurnace Envision 2-stage 3 ton) never runs in anything other than 1st stage, and never will. In fact, my geo system was designed to prevent usage of 2nd stage, and further, this appears to be prevalent design intent in the Dallas area. Best regards, Bill |
|
Energy reduction & monitoring</br> American Energy Efficiencies, Inc - Dallas, TX <A href="http://www.americaneei.com"> (www.americaneei.com)</A></br> Example monitoring system: <A href="http://www.welserver.com/WEL0043"> www.welserver.com/WEL0043</A>
|
|
|
Bill Neukranz
 Veteran Member
 Posts:1103
 |
| 18 Sep 2008 10:55 AM |
|
OK, after about a day of looking at the numbers, it sure looks like what I noted a year ago, when I too wanted to know the answer to whether or not it works to have a DSH direct-connected to a gas-fired HWH.
(This is specifically for (and limited to) a water-to-air (WaterFurnace Envision series) R410A 2-speed 3 ton GSHP, in cooling mode, where it's DSH is direct connected to a 50 gal. natural gas burning HWH. It may or may not apply to heating mode, R22 systems, and/or something other than water-to-air GSHPs.)
As seen from the below 4 hour chart, when the HWH's burner kicked on, HW temp was raised above the temp of the R410A refrig going into the DSH.
So, my observations is:
To make the DSH provide economic benefit, the HWH's tstat has to be turned down enough to minimize the amount of time the GSHP runs in a less than normal efficient manner. Turning down the tstat will maximize DSH performance / minimize GSHP efficiency impact.
And obviously personal comfort and geographic region will substantially affect tstat setting.
I've got a 20 hour chart now set up to accumulate, to check this observation.
Hope this has helped on this subject.
Best regards,
Bill |
Attachment: InstantaneousDeSuperHeaterPerformanceA.jpg
|
Energy reduction & monitoring</br> American Energy Efficiencies, Inc - Dallas, TX <A href="http://www.americaneei.com"> (www.americaneei.com)</A></br> Example monitoring system: <A href="http://www.welserver.com/WEL0043"> www.welserver.com/WEL0043</A>
|
|
|
Bill Neukranz
 Veteran Member
 Posts:1103
 |
| 19 Sep 2008 11:47 AM |
|
I collected more data, enough so that I'm ready to summarize my observations.
I realize these summary observations do not agree with well stated and respected contributions here, from either owners who are satisfied with their DSH's performance when direct-connected to a gas-fired HWH, or professionals who do install GSHP DSHs direct-connected to gas-fired HWHs. I don't have an explanation for why my observations are not consistent with these contributions.
My summary observations (see charts below):
(1) The amount of heating contribution to Domestic HW from the DSH is minimal. Most of the time the HW temp increase contribution is just a few degrees. It's tough to add heat to the HW when the HW incoming to the DSH is on the order of 110 - 120°.
(2) During the time when the gas burner is on, and for a time period after the gas burner turns off, there is a reverse heat flow. Heat flows from the HW to the refrigerant. This results in a small amount of cooling of the HW, and a small amount of GSHP efficiency reduction. It's tough to avoid this situation since the HW is being heated to a higher temp than the R410A refrigerant.
(3) The situation can be improved favorably with a substantially lowered HWH tstat setting, but loss of considerable comfort is a result.
My specific conditions:
(1) Water-to-air (WaterFurnace Envision series) R410A 2-speed 3 ton GSHP (2) In cooling mode (3) DSH is direct-connected to a 50 gal. natural gas burning HWH
I don't know if my observations are applicable to heating mode, R22 systems, or something other than water-to-air GSHPs.
The charts below, and other charts, are available in real-time at http://welserver.com/WEL0043/ .
Best regards,
Bill |
Attachment: InstantaneousDeSuperHeaterPerformance4.jpg
|
Energy reduction & monitoring</br> American Energy Efficiencies, Inc - Dallas, TX <A href="http://www.americaneei.com"> (www.americaneei.com)</A></br> Example monitoring system: <A href="http://www.welserver.com/WEL0043"> www.welserver.com/WEL0043</A>
|
|
|
Palace Geothermal
 Veteran Member
 Posts:1609
 |
| 19 Sep 2008 11:55 AM |
|
Posted By a0128958 on 09/19/2008 11:47 AM I collected more data, enough so that I'm ready to summarize my observations.
I don't have an explanation for why my observations are not consistent with these contributions.
Bill I suspect the reason is because you have data and the rest are only offering opinions. ( thanks engineer :) ) What you have demonstrated most clearly is the need for a preheat tank. As others on this forum have been vigorously promoting. Thanks for sharing
|
|
Dewayne Dean <br>www.PalaceGeothermal.com<br>Why settle for 90% when you can have 400%<br>We heat and cool with dirt!<br>visit- http://welserver.com/WEL0114/- to see my system |
|
|
| You are not authorized to post a reply. |
|
Active Forums 4.1
 |
Membership: |
 |
Latest:
croccohvacusa |
 |
New Today:
0 |
 |
New Yesterday:
0 |
 |
Overall:
35027 |
 |
People Online: |
 |
Visitors:
147 |
 |
Members:
0 |
 |
Total:
147 |
|
|
|