Posted By engineer on 29 Apr 2010 02:33 AM
I wonder if the Slim Jim requirement of 2' feet of unfrozen water above assumes static water (lake or pond).
If a Slim Jim were immersed in water with any significant flow I doubt it would need any depth above itself to transfer design heat.
Whatever heat exchanger is installed would have to deal with floods, debris and other effects of moving water, but if the water is truly always moving the heat exchanger could be much much smaller than that typically required in a pond / lake.
Agreed, but a slim jim panel partially immersed during dry season is not so good. Description of this intermittant stream has a picture in my minds eye that suggests depth may be better measured in inches during the dry season. Further the slim jim design is compact owing to the vertical installation (much like recipe cards in a file box). if you had to install them horizontally to keep them underwater, the design may stretch longer than the property line and expose a terrific amount of loop to impact damage.
OP,
I think your plan is more the product of available technologies and material than end benefit. You know where to get and how to handle PVC there fore you'd rather use it. If it is exposed in a stream, you could repair it.
If that is the case, let's consider meeting in the middile with pecs. Long runs can be buried with confidence, tools and pipe are readily available and joints can be made by tools from big box store.
Fittings and manifolds concealed by lawn irrigation box or sump well can be reached if repair is needed in future. Isolation valves in the same place permit flushing with a garden hose.
j