footings for icf on bedrock - proper method to level
Last Post 27 Nov 2010 08:58 AM by Viking House. 26 Replies.
Printer Friendly
Sort:
PrevPrev NextNext
You are not authorized to post a reply.
Page 2 of 2 << < 12
Author Messages
robinncUser is Offline
Advanced Member
Advanced Member
Send Private Message
Posts:586

--
09 Jun 2008 11:16 PM
Good info Chris! I had heard alot of that watching 'Modern Marvels' awhile back. I just don't understand why they would build these huge bridges attached to bedrock in siesmic areas (CA) but the code says you 'can't' do this with a house??
buddenUser is Offline
New Member
New Member
Send Private Message
Posts:40

--
09 Jun 2008 11:20 PM
Chris,

Pretty close.  When the Brooklyn Bridge was built, it was something of an engineering marvel of the day.  And they had to go through a lot of muck to get down to the bedrock, just as you've noted.  So the engineer put caissons in place where the piers would go -- essentially a large-diameter vertical pipe with the top sealed.  Pressurize the caisson so it won't admit water.  The work crews would airlock inside and dig.  As they went down, so did the caisson.  When they got to the rock, they stopped digging and the caisson stopped sinking; it's now a form for the pier.  (This recitation from memory)  I recall from the reading the digging job was not the safest occupation in the world.  Or even New York. 
Bruce FreyUser is Offline
Basic Member
Basic Member
Send Private Message
Posts:429

--
10 Jun 2008 06:46 AM
Posted By Chris Johnson on 06/09/2008 8:51 PM
Well...here is my dumb answer...

A bridge requires a pre determined depth into bedrock to provide not only shear stability but also to 'lock' the sides of the piers to help prevent it from moving/shifting under stresses caused by several factors including...but not limited to vehicular traffic (Live Load) Wind loads (TBD), sheer weight of the structure itself (Dead Load).

Without properly anchoring the structure to the ground the dead load by itself could very well allow the structure to collapse as the piers would be able to slide out and skid on the surface. Now if that didn't happen but you add a live load which would be causing harmonic vibrations the undue stresses could very well make everything shift and slide...hence, dig into bedrock and lock it in.




Not a dumb answer!  Every structure must deal with some horizontal loads weather it is from wind, seismic or other dynamic forces.   Keying it into bedrock is certainly one way to do it and is probably the case in the bridge example (although in seismic areas large buildings are also likely to be built on rubber or sliding dampeners  to control motion). 

On massive structures like bridges and tall buildings, the bearing capacity of the underlying material is very important.  When building on rock (especially limestone), the upper interface with the overlying soil is likely to be 'weathered' (i.e., cracked, fissured, with veins of soil).  This weathered material must usually be removed to get to sound rock and is probably the most usual reason for rock excavation.  The cores (stairs, elevators, restrooms, etc.) of tall buildings typically have higher foundation loads than the perimeter and care must be taken to minimize differential settlements, so sound bearing is important.

Just as an aside, the bends (nitrogen bubbles in the blood) was also known as "caisson disease" because the poor souls working in pressurized caissons frequently suffered from this problem.  They were definitely not nice places to work.

Bruce
huss32User is Offline
New Member
New Member
Send Private Message
Posts:1

--
18 Oct 2010 12:44 PM
Do you have any pictures of projects using this method?
Bruce FreyUser is Offline
Basic Member
Basic Member
Send Private Message
Posts:429

--
22 Oct 2010 08:24 AM
I do not know of any recent projects that have used pressurized caissons. I suspect if you google on pressurized caissons, I suspect you will find some diagrams or pix.

Bruce
insul8User is Offline
New Member
New Member
Send Private Message
Posts:7

--
05 Nov 2010 08:23 PM
In case this helps, i remembered seeing these photographs http://www.quadlock.info/photos/thumbnails.php?album=182
Viking HouseUser is Offline
New Member
New Member
Send Private Message
Posts:37
Avatar

--
27 Nov 2010 08:58 AM

This is the foundation system we use for ICF houses, it eliminates the Cold Bridge where the wall sits on the ground and the material costs are much less. The structural EPS directly under the footing can take very high loadings.

Can you afford not to build a <A href="http://www.viking-house.ie">Passive House</A>? <a href="http://www.viking-house.co.uk">www.viking-house.co.uk</a>
You are not authorized to post a reply.
Page 2 of 2 << < 12


Active Forums 4.1
Membership Membership: Latest New User Latest: croccohvacusa New Today New Today: 0 New Yesterday New Yesterday: 0 User Count Overall: 35027
People Online People Online: Visitors Visitors: 230 Members Members: 0 Total Total: 230
Copyright 2011 by BuildCentral, Inc.   Terms Of Use  Privacy Statement