Badger:
I wanted to set the record straight regarding the design and installation of the WB system: GC vs. radiant sub installing the boards.
The mechanical system design is still done by the radiant folks. The orientation of the WB panels is dictated by the joist direction, certainly, but the zoning, tube run lengths, manifold placement, and every other variable regarding the heating portion is done with the radiant designer calling the shots. It is a somewhat more complicated endeavor simply because there is one more level of coordination of trades to consider, and because that coordination happens sooner in the building cycle, BUT the people at WB are skilled at quarter-backing all that. I believe there are heating people on this forum that can attest to that first-hand.
If the radiant installer/designer team were more aware of the asset they have in WB for the coordination of design, I doubt that it would be the issue that it seems to be on the surface. The coordination of design between the structural aspects and thermal performance aspects simply requires all the parties to work together. Your WB rep can be the pivot person for that. Just do it early in the design process before the engineering work is complete.
Having said that, the system design notwithstanding, there are some advantages to the construction process to just get the house built and deal with the radiant installation later. That is one of the calling cards of the after-subfloor panel systems, including the one I sell in the Northwest: Ecowarm. These products can go into new construction or retro-fit equally as well, provide similar performance in some cases, and have a much reduced impact on the pre-planning required for WB or any cementitius pour.
I will withhold a response to Montysc because I feel a sales pitch coming on - my left eye is beginning to twitch and my fingers on the keyboard are starting to tighten up.
