Posted By toddm on 26 Sep 2010 01:04 PM
My apology for misquoting you. It was Engineer who called the fed's nos "hopelessly out of date at best."
Now it is your turn. I've never had a geo system and consequently no bad experiences or axes to grind. And there is no "slant" in life cycle cost analyses. They are done thousands of times a day by hardheaded business people. The slant I find on this forum is sales types who call a geo purchase an investment when it doesn't earn income or appreciate in value and thus fails Noah Webster's two criteria, or call it cash flow positive when they really asking you to defer the hit.
I'm sorry. You find folks on a geo forum "slanted" towards geo?
Who'd a thunk it?
I missed my guess suggesting you had a bad geo experience as you are hell bent against it.
Perhaps you had a bad semantic experience so you want to discredit our use of the term investment?
My bad.
I used to invest in real estate, but that apparently is now an expense (if you aren't too hung up on semantics). I'll check Webster for the definition of "expense".
J