Can EPS be used to insulate footer?
Last Post 22 Feb 2011 12:08 AM by guest. 13 Replies.
Printer Friendly
Sort:
PrevPrev NextNext
You are not authorized to post a reply.
Author Messages
AltonUser is Offline
Veteran Member
Veteran Member
Send Private Message
Posts:2164

--
17 Feb 2011 03:07 PM

Reference the High-R Foundations Case Study Analysis, Figure 45:  Case 12 - Interstitial XPS Insulation or Concrete-Insulation-Concrete (CIC) as we commonly call this type of wall appears to be ideal for building in the Southeast to avoid insect damage.  

However, with this Case 12 and others, there is some energy loss through the un-insulated concrete footer.  How could the footer be insulated?  Could the footer be poured in an EPS trough?  Which type of EPS would be strong enough to withstand the weight of the concrete basement wall and the main floor above?

Residential Designer &
Construction Technology Consultant -- E-mail: Alton at Auburn dot Edu Use email format with @ and period .
334 826-3979
zehbossUser is Offline
Basic Member
Basic Member
Send Private Message
Posts:216

--
17 Feb 2011 03:33 PM
Alton,

Foam treated diatomaceous earth and with boric acid is insect resistant. Geofoam is an example of the least expensive underground safe polystyrene. It was designed as fill for under hiway construction and next to large building fill around foundations. I have poured foundations into forms made of Geofoam.

Brian
ICF Solutions
Engineering, Designing, and Building Passive, Net Zero, Self-Heated, Self-Cooled, Self-Electrified, Low Cost Homes
Basic shell starting at R-50 Walls, R-80 Roof structures. for $30/square foot
(360) 529-9339
[email protected]
AltonUser is Offline
Veteran Member
Veteran Member
Send Private Message
Posts:2164

--
17 Feb 2011 04:17 PM

Brian,

Thanks.  Is Geofoam availabe in different types or grades or compressive strengths?  If so, which did you use?

Residential Designer &
Construction Technology Consultant -- E-mail: Alton at Auburn dot Edu Use email format with @ and period .
334 826-3979
FBBPUser is Offline
Veteran Member
Veteran Member
Send Private Message
Posts:1215

--
18 Feb 2011 12:31 PM
Alton - would this not be in the same ballpark as insulated shallow footings? I think there has been a number of post regarding this and I believe Viking actually set some photos and details.
Dana1User is Offline
Senior Member
Senior Member
Send Private Message
Posts:6991

--
18 Feb 2011 04:08 PM
Under slabs or highways it's easy, but with 10' of vertical concrete + the weight of the house bearing on it you need to calculate the weight bearing on it to determine the widht. But the width required is fairly simple math, if you've calculated the actual weight of the building.

Geofoam is available in multiple grades- the 2lb Geofoam (EPS100) has 14.5psi resistance ( about one ton per square foot) at a 1% deformation, EPS 50 has half the rating.:

http://www.falcongeofoam.com/

Add up the static weight of what's it's carrying, and put in a multiplier (double it?) for dynamic factor margin to come up with how many square inches of footing it takes to stay within that 1% limit. 10' of concrete (full basement + footing) takes up about 3/4 of the rating for the width of the concrete wall- the rest has to be estimated by other means. Obviously a brick clad CMU cavity wall will need much wider footer & or denser foam than vinyl siding on stick built. The weight of the fill on the exterior lobe of the footing should also be factored into the calc.

The relevance of that thermal short to the footer through the inner half of the CIC assembly is low in the southeastern US due to the relatively modest delta-T between conditioned space and deep subsoil temps. (You could probably tolerate that even in a PassiveHouse design by compensating elsewhere.)
AltonUser is Offline
Veteran Member
Veteran Member
Send Private Message
Posts:2164

--
18 Feb 2011 05:26 PM
Thanks to everyone that replied.
Residential Designer &
Construction Technology Consultant -- E-mail: Alton at Auburn dot Edu Use email format with @ and period .
334 826-3979
Dana1User is Offline
Senior Member
Senior Member
Send Private Message
Posts:6991

--
21 Feb 2011 02:45 PM
This article has a pretty good summary of the issues involved.  (And the bottom line looks pretty good.)
Viking HouseUser is Offline
New Member
New Member
Send Private Message
Posts:37
Avatar

--
21 Feb 2011 04:07 PM
We've been using EPS foundations for years and have had no problems in over 100 projects, as Dana said always calculate the load first, you can see some of our foundation details here.
Can you afford not to build a <A href="http://www.viking-house.ie">Passive House</A>? <a href="http://www.viking-house.co.uk">www.viking-house.co.uk</a>
Viking HouseUser is Offline
New Member
New Member
Send Private Message
Posts:37
Avatar

--
21 Feb 2011 04:34 PM
:)
Can you afford not to build a <A href="http://www.viking-house.ie">Passive House</A>? <a href="http://www.viking-house.co.uk">www.viking-house.co.uk</a>
Bob IUser is Offline
Veteran Member
Veteran Member
Send Private Message
Posts:1435

--
21 Feb 2011 04:53 PM
VH: have you had any problems with ants in your EPS?
Bob Irving<br>RH Irving Homebuilders<br>Certified Passive House Consultant
guestUser is Offline
New Member
New Member
Send Private Message
Posts:40

--
21 Feb 2011 08:46 PM
Remember--pour your footing on foam is good
Pour you footing on engineered gravel that is consolidated properly Unacceptable even though most buildings built more than 150 years ago were built this way unless solid rock was within practical consideration
Rubble trench was Frank Lloyd Wright's preferred method and we all know he fringe.

I saw someone bragging that , even though only 8" thick footings were the requirement, they pour 12" (the inference being they are the better builder for doing so)
I pour mine 96" thick.
#1. The bearing capacity of the existing conditions.
#2. the bearing capacity of the modified portion whether it is concrete leveling course or the wall
#3. how the calculations from above interface with what is going to be built.
At some point it all gets transfered to the bearing medium (ground) The most important factor is the engineering to determine how WIDE the FOOTing should be in relation to the bearing capacity of what it is being put on.
The main advantage to a Rubble trench approach is that it requires some thought and understanding of what the operative factors are.
A poured concrete footing can be done by people who think that JUST making it thicker makes it able to dissipate the load better. It can be a negative factor if other things are not ALSO considered.
AltonUser is Offline
Veteran Member
Veteran Member
Send Private Message
Posts:2164

--
21 Feb 2011 11:03 PM

Guest,

Please explain in more detail your statement about not pouring a footer on engineered gravel.  I understood that compacted gravel on stable soil or rock is acceptable to code officials.  In my area geotechnical engineers specify compacted gravel on a solid base for the footer.

Residential Designer &
Construction Technology Consultant -- E-mail: Alton at Auburn dot Edu Use email format with @ and period .
334 826-3979
guestUser is Offline
New Member
New Member
Send Private Message
Posts:40

--
22 Feb 2011 12:06 AM
sarcasm--reference to the many posts from "experts" who content it is "bad" construction.
guestUser is Offline
New Member
New Member
Send Private Message
Posts:40

--
22 Feb 2011 12:08 AM
To further explain to those who think it is absolutely mandatory that one has to first pour a footing, look up rubble trench
You are not authorized to post a reply.

Active Forums 4.1
Membership Membership: Latest New User Latest: croccohvacusa New Today New Today: 0 New Yesterday New Yesterday: 0 User Count Overall: 35027
People Online People Online: Visitors Visitors: 465 Members Members: 0 Total Total: 465
Copyright 2011 by BuildCentral, Inc.   Terms Of Use  Privacy Statement