Posted By arkie6 on 12/22/2009 10:42 AM
The Mooney Wall looks like a neat idea. I wonder if it could be improved on just a bit by adding 1/2" XPS or Polyiso on the interior side. This would bring the wall thickness out to a standard 2x6 framed wall thickness of 5.5" (3.5" stud + 1.5" 2x strapping + 0.5" foam = 5.5"). This would make installation of standard exterior door casings for 2x6 walls fit better, plus it adds another thermal break and 2.5 to 3.0 of R value to the wall insulation. This could be done on the outside as well if using fiber faced Polyiso.
Great minds think alike!
All thermal breaks are good. The Mooney Wall approach reduces the unbroken thermal bridging to the intersections where they overlap. But just 1/2" strips between the 2x4 and the cross-members would be as effective as full sheets on the interior (!).
I'd think this is an application where double-layered pads/short-strips of 1/4" Thermablok aerogel may be be more cost-effective than full sheets of XPS or similar:

http://www.thermablok.com/http://www.thermablok.com/pdf/Thermablok_Product_Information_20090601.pdfBut full stud-length strips of 1/2" XPS would have reasonable compression characteristics to handle the lateral members, would easy to field-fabricate, and wouldn't interfere with blowing insulation. Low density iso would be too squishy to use between the framing in the same way- you'd need to find a source for 2lb density iso sheets in 1/2" thickness (and I'm not sure it exists.) 1/2" of aerogel would have an R value of ~4+, compared to R2.5 for XPS. The thermal break on the rest of the stud with 2" (of framing + XPS/aerogel framing spacers) of cellulose offered is about R6-R7, so aerogel spacers would even that out considerably.