Posted By cmkavala on 29 Apr 2010 03:27 PM
I once replaced a roof that was designed for a 10 ft. span and it was actually spanning 20 ft., it did for about 2 years before it failed.
I didn't mean to imply that SIP roofs are more prone to failure. In fact I think the opposite is true. They should be able to more dynamically disperse impacts as long as the skin is not pierced. I would think a metal panel with metal roof is ideal.
The difference is a SIP roof panel can have 10 or more feet of unsupported panel allowing for some (preferably minor) long term creep/deflection in the middle of the span. A truss roof seldom has more than a couple of feet of unsupported roof between trusses and individual chords along the truss itself.
The limitations in span length are based on deflection which is much more stringent than expected failure (degree depends on material). In addition it would be an unusual event to actually experience the design roof loads. I would expect gross overspanning like you mentioned to be required to actaully have a roof fail. I was just cautioning about pushing the span limit in terms of looks. I would not want a noticable deflection in my roof to develop over time even if it was of no consequence structurally.