I think my contractor may have screwed up...
Last Post 23 Nov 2007 09:58 AM by Mark Ross. 41 Replies.
Printer Friendly
Sort:
PrevPrev NextNext
You are not authorized to post a reply.
Page 2 of 3 << < 123 > >>
Author Messages
irnivekUser is Offline
Basic Member
Basic Member
Send Private Message
Posts:229

--
06 Sep 2007 09:18 AM

So....

Lots more of the "we're so great" lots of words and time put in typing, but not even as much as your simple design mix to help the rest of us get moving toward the holy grail of ART proficiency.  Or should I say from now on, the artists formerly known as ART.

Come on, its time to give the consumer a big warm bear hug, to tell them they are pioneers and will have success using ICF especially by working with a value added experienced REGIONAL distributor, not some fear inducing rethoric that it takes years to pour a wall consolidated or plumb. 

Once again, the consumer leaves this forum feeling fearful and overwhelmed.  And starts asking every installer they meet about gravelling, to which the response is probably jagged and not well thought out.  Partially because it is an artist formerly known as ART' own self- coined term, is it not? 

With proper industry set protocols, this "gravelling" becomes a non issue.  We just moved to Wyoming, where fly ash in the mix is not available.  We received a mix that would hardly pump our first pour;  Great concrete, just hard to pump.  I took some time and stripped foam, no problems-because our protocols are in place.  Yes, it is a wonderful idea to check ones own pour after the fact.

I am not a concrete design mixer, I do so much want to learn, but this "knowledge is power, lets keep the knowledge but boast publicly about our incredible feats" has got to stop.  Its shows the difference between being sales based and service/consumer based, an area the ICF industry is shifting to. 

Ian Gielser as never been perfect (sorry Ian) but his websites, link and link speak volumes about who he works for.  THE CONSUMER.


Mark:

I am glad some of the ICF leads I'm sending your way are working out for you.

It's really not if you're drinking, sometimes its what you're smoking that worries some of us....  

For the consumer who sees this as bickering, I sincerely apologoze.  In a self regulating industry, some simply must be proactive and at times tough to properly edify the entire industry.  I meet too many homeowners excited to build with technology, but scared stiff of "problems" who build conventionally.  Later, they have told me they regret not spending the $5K ICF surcharge for a basement.  What a shame.

In the future, I hope to be able to unite industry wide, not only "ex ART now INTERNAL wide" for the long term benefit of the consumer and the environment.  Yep, there may be some pain, but that was the whole point of the Revolution, wasn't it?

Kevin

walltechUser is Offline
Basic Member
Basic Member
Send Private Message
Posts:390

--
06 Sep 2007 01:34 PM
Mark & Wolf: Mark I see in your previous post your stating that you don't use this site as a means for advertising, but at the same time your saying you don't post much here anymore. Fact is every time a subject about concrete floors or hydronic heat pops up, Wolf, Eldon and Tom are the first to reply. It always starts out as some sort of advice and ends up with a "call ART".
The guys that post solutions on hear quite regularly have figured out long by now that these guys are ART proteges, and the leads will end up back at an ART door. So if you really don't pay much attention to post anymore I guess you do know now they advertise all the time.
Secondly, anybody would have to be an idiot to believe that graveling could cause a wall to lean out, and I'm surprised to believe you haven't figured out by now what causes the lean with your vast knowledge and follow-up inspections of ICF pours.
Even if the customer above checked this wall for "Honeycombing" and it did have some in the area of the lean it would only prove you to be wrong, because that would mean the honeycombing would be on the straight walls also. An as far as that minor honeycombing goes, it has no affect on the walls integrity and would be of no concern to an Engineer and should not be used as a scare tactic to flush unsuspecting customers to the ART team.

Dave

Dave
GreenHauseHomesLtdUser is Offline
New Member
New Member
Send Private Message
Posts:4

--
09 Sep 2007 07:32 PM
Posted By walltech on 08/28/2007 8:09 AM
By all means this wall is currently safe, but your concerns for it getting worse above is a valid concern. Is the sub floor installed yet? and if not is it back filled. There's no reason for it being out of plumb, but I would have suspected you would have said not straight. A little puzzling that you wouldn't have seen that first considering if the corners are plumb, and the walls out 5/8 the wall would have a 5/8 bow in it. It's possible due to its height the contractor bowed it out slightly to accommodate back-fill pressure, if the framers wanted to 1/2 back-fill before framing. We need more info to answer this one.

Dave

I have never used ICFs befroe, but the principles for pouring concrete are the same regardless of the method used.

As stated elsewhere, while not desireable, the 1/2- 5/8" out of plumb should not be a problem. Structurally, they are perfectly sound, they just might not look pretty :) We had a wall (poured using 3/4" plywwod forms) 20' high that was almost 2" out of plumb, and it still passed the engineers inspection.

Good luck :)
Mark RossUser is Offline
New Member
New Member
Send Private Message
Posts:73

--
10 Sep 2007 11:47 AM
Mix design is a standard 3000 mix with 5/8" to 3/4" crushed granite course (you may have to import, and its not that much more) NO ADDITIVES.
4.5 to max 5" slump (look in the back of the truck on an idle drum turn, look to see that the concrete flows over the mixing fins with no "holes", evenly do not allow it to become so fluid that it simply "waterfalls" over, there should be about 1/3rd the width of the flow at the bottom, compared to the top of the flow.
Placement of steel must allow for min 2.5" clear from outside of form.
Blocks must be placed preciesly, with a 1/4" max variance out of level, over 10'
Change double steel header designs to single larger bar header designs.
Use a 2" commercial vibrator. better action, feel the wall by leaning your thigh on it, and the shaft by holding it directly, there should be no sudden loss of the suttle "humming" feeling in your hand or thigh. Additionally, listen to the vibrator motor for a surge in RPM, the motor should be under a constant, and steady work load. Lastly, look for a fairly clear water seeping just slightly from each vertical joint in the ICF block, along with a surface condensation (so long as it is not dry and/or windy) forming within about 10 minutes, this should cover the entire wall and prooves proper consolidation.
Place lifts of concrete in 4'-5' max, to allow trapped air to be worked out to the top of the lift.
Look at the concrete, it should "flow" about 24" both sides of the vibrator, as you are placing.
If a blow out or buldge occures DO NOT STOP VIBRATING PROPERLY, this will result in issues, as many a blow out has incorect concrete bonding throughout. And most of all, do not stop the pour, simply move, cold joints in rough, unconsolodated concrete will result in non-homogenous material at the joint.
do not use a reducing fitting on the pump, pour out of the 5" hose, this is easily accomodated by laying the hose horizontally, with the end sitting on the inside foam edge of the block, and pumping at a rate that the concrete simply flows against the opposite foam panel, which flattens it out, and allows it to drop down the 2.5" wide space we left between the panel and rebar. Remember also to fill each cavity, do not drop it on the ties, it will seperate and cause excessive air pockets in the mix. The stiff mix places well this way, is very clean, vibrates easier, and most of all, is not hard on the forms as there is little impact energy at the bottom of the wall. This is placing, not dropping the concrete in.
The 3/4" crushed, bonds better in the mix, providing a stronger wall AND MOST OF ALL, allows for the vibrator to perform very effectively with little pressure on the forms.
Line the walls up straight, and with each pass, re-straighten. Have two people that this is all they do, when you are done, stick around for a few hours, drink beer, relax, and just fine tune all the walls.
Remeber that thinner mixes tend to force installers to bring bracing centers closer, and cause a lot of form floatation, wobbles between braces and at headers, as well as unwanted movement in the forms. For those who believe that honeycombing is OK, then thats your perogative, I would much rather a consistent concrete section, than one with honeycombing. Yes graveling exists, your call on what you want to do here, I will let commonsense pervail on these issues.

As for headers, they should be perfectly straight, and if you drop concrete directly on a wood form, very often you force the blocks up, resulting in raised headers, or twisted headers which typically is the result of mis-aligned panel cuts, or forced floatation, form construciton is very important to get right, your blocks should be cut well enough, that you cannot see the joints.

There is a lot more, however I simply dont have the time to go through a book on this website, there are so many questions with respect to form construction, reinforcement, wall alignment, shoring and concrete placement, that I really cannot put it within a post here.

Again, I would like to advise that I am not naming names here, nor slamming anyone or any block, I wish that the same respect and consideration would be extended toward myself as well.

Mark Ross
ICF372User is Offline
Basic Member
Basic Member
Send Private Message
Posts:111

--
10 Sep 2007 06:27 PM

Wow I can't believe I was included in this post,  sence I never posted. And a protege nun the less.

It's a pretty soggy day here so I have a little time.

I have had voids in some of my walls. Probably more than I'm aware of, being that we were taught "not" to internaly vibrate in the those early days. It's a lot of work paching a concrete void. So these days we are using 1.5 to 2" vibraters.  I'd rather rasp a little foam bulge than have a poorly built structure.
I've have had walls that leaned as well, much to my suprise because they were straight when we left the site.
When you work with home owner assited projects you learn a  lot about pushing the limits.


Such as: 

 Poorly assembled forms, Forms overhanging the footings " this will make a wall lean", forms settling.
And reciently a poorly manufactured " home made" bracing witch will make a wall lean at the bottom and middle of the wall.

The repairative measure for a leaning ,but structural safe wall, will most likly be: rasping foam on one side and adding foam on the other and then rasping it flat.

 Avoiding all of these problems while improving our craft is where this whole ART thing came into play for me.
And if there actualy is a "protege" involved it is this shared knowlage.

Oh! I almost forgot . Would anyone like some SpeedFloor?

Eldon Howe<br>Howe Construction

[email protected]

<br><br>Total Concrete Homes provide positive cash flow , DAY ONE .
eric monkmanUser is Offline
Basic Member
Basic Member
Send Private Message
Posts:262
Avatar

--
10 Sep 2007 08:12 PM
Out of plumb shows lack of experience and appropriate strategy. To bad so sad.

But really Mr Ross..... 3/4 agg . and a 2 inch vibe ?

In itself specing a 3/4 mix will add to honeycomb issues as the RM suppliers will tend to cut back on powder.

A 2in vibe In the hands of an amateur, in a foam form, could lead to yet more trouble :-) Why bother ?

Most manufacturers are still specifying 3/8 aggregate, and rightfully so, because it consolidates easier.

3/8 aggregate, polyheed, and a Makita vibe for the lintels is our gig.
Takes the pain out of dragging a 10 ft vibe with a 2 in head around. Takes 2 guys out of the crew to do that. waste of energy.

Better mud is always worth the money.
Mark RossUser is Offline
New Member
New Member
Send Private Message
Posts:73

--
10 Sep 2007 08:51 PM

Working with an open mind, can bring people forward.  It took me a long time to step away from super plasticized, 3/8" pea gravel high slump mixes because I was concerned about voids, honeycombing and such related items.  When I did, and listened to the professionals around me, and gave it an honest try, I was very suprized to find that it worked very, very well.  With the expierience of seeing a 2" vibrator PLUS two 1" vibrators at the bottom of a stiff mix, course aggregate pour, with no bulging or bowing, and perfect consolodation for over one minute (yes they were all turned on and runnig).  I can say that I have the confidence in the older, tried and true methods of standard concrete placement.  As for the reduction in portland, I was trying to advise that I get a standard, ACI partitioned mix, not a strength mix, which is both economical, and has lots of portland in it. Best part is that it is actually cheaper to purchase by the yard for the most part.

Please take the time to open your mind, try something new, however please also do so with an expierienced individual, as you have to commit to the entire process, not just the mix, or placement or vibrating, it has to be all or nothing, with an honest effort placed.

Not Placeing or consolodating your concrete properly is not only against all codes, it is against good standards of practice.  Please take the time to read recent posts with reference to a real life expierience of this boards general advise on proper consolodation.  Additionally, please read the PCA report bulliten RD134  Concrete Consolodation and the potential for voids in ICF walls by the PCA written by John Gagda and Amy Dowel.

Its pretty descriptive and self explainatory, and as an independant and reputable organization, backs up what we have been saying for years.

Mark Ross

eric monkmanUser is Offline
Basic Member
Basic Member
Send Private Message
Posts:262
Avatar

--
10 Sep 2007 10:00 PM
Mr Ross:
I 've poured structural concrete for 26 yrs and dragged around my fair share of vibrators.
If I can buy a mix design that's close to self-consolidating, I will.
Easier to pump, easier to place, and no chance of honeycombing.
I've had some walls sawcut for openings , in change of use situations, and the consolidation was perfect.
I'm often on the hose yet,as you can see everything that's happening at the pump, at the mixer, and in the wall.
I'm sure what works for you, works for you.. as you know the intricasies of your systems .
It's just not for me in an ICF situation.


link

link
woulfccUser is Offline
Basic Member
Basic Member
Send Private Message
Posts:147

--
11 Sep 2007 01:59 AM
Lets have an icf rodeo at the world of concrete.
We can stack and pour,
We can win a big belt buckle.
Or is this off the original post
Sorry
How about the original poster are you still here?
We should move this in to a new area so we can help the home owner.
I am sorry, we are here for YOU. I know we all get a Little wrapped up in this stuff.
What do you expect from men that play with Lego's
Just needed that out their.
Lot's of good imfo here to read ,what ever happened to the open form? 
Changing How the World BUILDS!<br>Green , Done , Easy<br>Woulf c.c. of Wisconsin
eric monkmanUser is Offline
Basic Member
Basic Member
Send Private Message
Posts:262
Avatar

--
11 Sep 2007 08:42 AM
Chuckle Wolfy. LOL. Do I need to bring my 1 page resume to the games ?

The only point I would hammer home, is to build using the specifications that the block manufacturers have in their manuals.

Mark RossUser is Offline
New Member
New Member
Send Private Message
Posts:73

--
11 Sep 2007 12:37 PM

Assuming that thier specifications are code compliant and up to date with the latest available information, as well as complete, accurate and tested, with ICC and/or CMHC approvals.

Remember that most installation manuals are not written by qualified individuals or have any real reasearch behind them.  There are two that particularily stand out as quality manuals, The old greenblock manuals (Argosol) where well written and complete, as well as Integraspecs manuals, which I am personally aware of being well researched and complete as well.  Most others hinge off of the writers or manufacturers personal and most often local experience and tend to be very vauge about concrete, the prescriptive method, which is lacking in current information and needs to be updated, or worse yet, no manual other than form construction instructions at best.

Having written a couple of install manuals for ICF manufacturers, and been actively involved in research associated with approvals and installation methods testing, I would say that the manuals I read, are sparse at best, and dont really detail all that is truely needed.  We need a new book written on construction practices associated with ICF formwork, including standards of practice as well as forming standards, which have never been defined.

Mark Ross

lkazanov2User is Offline
Basic Member
Basic Member
Send Private Message
Posts:177

--
11 Sep 2007 02:50 PM
Mark,

This is an article that I came across....

link

This is the "winning mix" design contest. What do you think?

Leonard

walltechUser is Offline
Basic Member
Basic Member
Send Private Message
Posts:390

--
11 Sep 2007 04:08 PM
Eric, it appears you also have the same results as we do. We have designed our own mix that consolidates excellently, and only requires vibration around windows and doors. Can't imagine making a pour harder by pouring a stone that is not recommended by the manufacture (right or wrong) and having the extra man power to run an internal through out the whole pour.

In my youth of ICF's and after a few other brands we used Amvic which at the time had no brick ledge form available so we made them. We ran 8" forms to the brick level, and tapered that form one sided like current taper tops, and then switched to 6". The next day sadly enough we stripped the 6" from brick up to top of foundation (basement only) to create our 4" ledge. Some of these if not most where walk outs, so we had to strip the whole wall at some locations up to the top of wall. This resulted in anywhere from a couple hundred sq ft to as much as a thousand sq ft of exposed concrete wall. The results where always the same, the walls where as smooth as a granite counter top and you couldn't even insert the tip of a ball point pen into the wall anywhere.

So I guess its all about your available mix, the forms you use, and your personal techniques that work best for you. And I hope we all can just talk ICF and keep the advertising and such out of the picture.

Your friend always

Dave
Mark RossUser is Offline
New Member
New Member
Send Private Message
Posts:73

--
11 Sep 2007 05:53 PM
I found the following remark in the mix design competition very intrigueing.

"To score well in the contest, the mix
must exhibit good flow characteristics, because
40% of the total score was based on
the U-box test result. For the second round,
all of the mix designs had a lower flow result
than in round one, even though the
average slump results increased slightly.
This supports the argument that a
high slump does not necessarily result in
a high degree of workability or ease of
placement. Slumps of 41⁄2 inches in different
mixes produced flow in one concrete,
but none in another."

Interesting. However more so, the mix design winning was an SCC, I wonder what kind of form pressures, floatation and other such issues such a mix may have an effect on. Combined with Gadja's report, there is more to think about here. I am also concerned about the static effects and drag effects. Thanks for the insightful information.

Mark Ross
eric monkmanUser is Offline
Basic Member
Basic Member
Send Private Message
Posts:262
Avatar

--
11 Sep 2007 06:33 PM
Dave : Victor Amend should give you a medal for your brickledge tenacity. Good that they've improved on things since then.
Knew there had to be some common sense around this site !
North America is way behind EU on self-consolidating / plasticized mixes and applications. We are easily 10 years behind.


link
walltechUser is Offline
Basic Member
Basic Member
Send Private Message
Posts:390

--
11 Sep 2007 08:02 PM
Thanks, and I would have to agree to the statement that we are years behind also.

Dave
irnivekUser is Offline
Basic Member
Basic Member
Send Private Message
Posts:229

--
11 Sep 2007 11:55 PM
We were working with Irving Materials (IMI) out of Indy on some mixes, they have a nice self levelling no finish flatwork mix poured at a 20 slump. No pea gravel, because it would float.... It breaks at 10,000 psi because of all the admixtures in it. It's called their 180 mix.
They said that it would work great in ICF because the admixtures reduced the head pressure, and reported pouring an 8 ft. ICF wall without problems. But then they tried it on a 4 inch wall which I heard blew to pieces. I actually know, because the ICF rep who borrowed my braces brought them back in a BAD mood covered with concrete...

irnivekUser is Offline
Basic Member
Basic Member
Send Private Message
Posts:229

--
11 Sep 2007 11:58 PM
Mark Ross:
I appreciate the extra time you've invested in helping me/us understand. Keep up the great work.

Kevin
greenbuilderUser is Offline
New Member
New Member
Send Private Message
Posts:21

--
22 Nov 2007 07:53 PM
Folks

I have been reading this forum for quite some time and have only recently began to reply. The reason I began to reply is that there is more opinions that are based upon incorrect information supplied by egotistical salesmen, overzealous installers and wanna be floor importers. I have personally dealt with ART, IntegraSpec and Speed floor and quite frankly their is only one of the three that I now, or ever have considered to be viable. Guess what the? The one I would keep is Integra Spec. However, I will add this. They have a great product but one lousy company to support it. And yes they are in bed with ART and it is not just Nick or Mark it is or should I say was both. I know neither of the two of them any way other than professional and feel that therefore I can speak freely and honestly.

I am an architect and General Contractor with almost 25 years experience and the past 12 years in the ICF business. And let me tell you guys, there are a heck a lot of other guys out there such as my self and Dave that has as much and more experience as these guys do or did. They just made it more public and bragged more than anyone else. I am so tired of hearing about Tifton GA, that I think I will puke if I hear one more person tell me they were trained by those guys on that job. Once again they just exploited their situation by getting their job built with virtually free labor. That project is small in comparison to many projects going on around the country and in the Caribbean at the present.

So lets all get over the fact that ART is a business that failed because two partners did not make it and that happens every day people. Who cares why or who started it or who kept what. In the end we will all know by who surfaces where and in what capacity. And lets wish them both well where ever or what ever they do. If you dont like them don't do business with them in the future. I have started 8 companies in 25 years and three have eventualy folded or closed. Lets move on and realize that there is many more qualified and smart and innovative installers and product distributors out there. If you want a good floor system look at link. I use this system and prefer it over speed floor anytime.

Sorry for the rude and curt comments but enough is enough. One last thing, kudos to Dave this is not the place to discuss peoples personal business. Call them direct and complain. Hope everyone had a blessed Thanksgiving and remebered to set a plate for a soldier who was alone in a foreign land so we could complain about what is and isn't right or fair. God Bless! Randy
Mark RossUser is Offline
New Member
New Member
Send Private Message
Posts:73

--
22 Nov 2007 09:06 PM
Greenbuilder:

Please refrain, I have not asked to be judged or otherwise, unless you know the story of ART, which I garantee you do not, then please dont judge what you know little about why an ongoing and successfull company closed.

I am here to provide information, and its nice that you have done many large buildings, however, before you think that the one I wont mention so you dont puke, is the largest or only commercial project I have done, then you are in for a bit of a suprize.  I have done much larger and more noted projects, this one had special considerations, without consideration for your proposed cheap labor.

I dont know you, and would not take the time to dishonour a christian, please extend the same respect.

Mark Ross

You are not authorized to post a reply.
Page 2 of 3 << < 123 > >>


Active Forums 4.1
Membership Membership: Latest New User Latest: croccohvacusa New Today New Today: 0 New Yesterday New Yesterday: 0 User Count Overall: 35027
People Online People Online: Visitors Visitors: 195 Members Members: 0 Total Total: 195
Copyright 2011 by BuildCentral, Inc.   Terms Of Use  Privacy Statement