Recommendations for ICF bracing
Last Post 23 Dec 2008 11:38 AM by tdbuilder. 52 Replies.
Printer Friendly
Sort:
PrevPrev NextNext
You are not authorized to post a reply.
Page 3 of 3 << < 123
Author Messages
BuntlyUser is Offline
Basic Member
Basic Member
Send Private Message
Posts:162

--
20 Dec 2008 08:53 PM

Vic, I am not sure what the upcharge would be for 8"o.c. studs.  See page 6 from link below.

http://tfinsulatedconcreteforms.com/images/stories/TechnicalLibrary/section3.pdf


Bunt



Bunt
timothaleUser is Offline
New Member
New Member
Send Private Message
Posts:23

--
20 Dec 2008 09:37 PM
bracing hardware used for parking garages, concrete elevator towers. freeway overpasses would be very helpful ..I considered having the owner-builder rent the hardware and building the floor before the pour. but the dealer rep talked him out of it..I think haviing the floor in place SQUARE and Level would be cost effective.  2 x lumber style with the big turnbuckels used in pour in place concrete walls form sustems  would work to hold the floor in position.  .. since you will not be pouring a foot of concrete for the floor wood 4x4 posts with ellis clamps and jacks  with  temporary beams are the easiest.  We did a ski lodge in the avalanch area.. 12 inch solid concrete  walls and 12 inch roof and had to use bridge style scaffolding.  Simpson hardware is expensive compared to other options  I forget the name but the style with 2 straps sticking out and the wrap around strap and screws are cheaper.   I have a hyd press in my shop and if I did it I would build a die and pre-bend all the wrap-around straps..the homeowner put them in and didn't rent my laser and weren't as good as they should have been. the small straight wall sections around the 45 deg corners would probably be hard to brace.  I would try to build plywood -2 x 4 form panels for those areas. you can have snap ties custom made to have cones or washers in the right spots for any width wall. ...metal gripper cones and 1/4 in. steel pencil rod with hairpins  and donuts would also work.  contractors who have been in commercial concrete buildings have solved a lot of problems you willhave .


lkazanov2User is Offline
Basic Member
Basic Member
Send Private Message
Posts:177

--
20 Dec 2008 09:39 PM
Posted By Buntly on 12/20/2008 6:27 PM

Leonard, I have installed the floor system prior to the pour before and had good results. I actually used steel joists and I did not use a ledger. Why the studs 16" o.c. to support the rim?(unless you are trying to brace the wall with these 2x4's) An Lvl ledger will easily carry the dead load of the floor system at 8' intervals or larger. I would put one at each end of a 16' Lvl and one in the center. I am not sure what kind of floor system you are installing, but with anchor bolts at 12" o.c., I don't believe the depth of the lvl would be an issue so you could save some $$ by going to a 9 1/4" or 11 7/8",.....but then again I am not sure what you are trying to do. One concern I would have, is if you fasten the ledger to the top of your wall prior to the pour and then stud down the the footing under the ledger, any form compression may "twist" the top of your wall. i.e. the outside of the top block will compress while the inside is restrained which may result in a crooked wall. I have found that the quality of the footing and the type of block used definatley affect  the amound of compression.

Bunt


Bunt,

Thank you for responding.  To clarify, the 16" LVL was chosen to match the 16" open web floor trusses from Universal Forest Products (aka, OJ2000).  These will be hung from the LVL.  The floor system is robust.   It is 16" OC and will utilize advantech 1" subfloor.  We spec'd for L/480 floor system.  You are correct in your assumption in that the shoring at 16" will also serve as a brace.  So getting back to your concerns would slotting the openings in the lumber when screwed to the forms allow for compression?  Since the LVL's J bolt connection will be cropped this wil allow some tolerance.   Bunt, how much compression would you expect at the top course of a 10' pour?  Approximately 1-2" or less?  This is the advantage of TF.  With vertical single piece tie at 12" OC their form technically cannot settle.  Am I wrong on this?  Having spoken to the TF engineers they say the slots in the bracing are not required for their system. As such, I think that the floor prior to the pour may work best with TF since the compression issue may be moot.  

My concern with TF is their corners need external bracing.  Diagonal whalers for sure but still external.  Their 45's require external horizontal strapping about 4 intervals in a 10' wall.  Their 12" system costs more because steel tie is required.  With quadlock the tie cost is about the same.  If it were not for the corner issue TF is almost ideal.    Their biggest advantage is the fact that you can make any form by simply ripping the panel and slotting for the tie.  It is extremely elegant.

To the prior question regarding TF 8" OC, they have this now to accomodate addional form pressures from SCC mixes.  Again, you can make your own spacing by simply ripping the panels and slotting for the ties.  (you just buy more ties).  Also, the ability to erect the system from the ground up and full height with single pass is a definite plus if not a morale booster.

If the prepour, floor system, shoring concept works better with TF I might reconsider....

Again, Bunt, Manfred, and to everyone who contributes to my thread I thank you.

Leonard




BuntlyUser is Offline
Basic Member
Basic Member
Send Private Message
Posts:162

--
20 Dec 2008 10:25 PM

I always try to eliminate joist hangers when possible. Eliminating the hangers eliminates the potential for squeaks. I typically use a top chord bearing floor truss @ 19.2" o.c.. I typically use a 9 1/4" lvl anchored to the wall. I will then take a 2x4 or 2x6 and fasten to lvl ledger with an approved nailing or screw schedule (3 1/4" brg). I will then use a top chord bearing floor to bear on the ledger.  http://www.trulinetruss.com/html/body_floor_truss.html   http://www.sbcindustry.com/images/publication_images/ttb%20floor%20truss%20fact%20sheet.pdf . If the span of the joist is over 30' or so, I will rest the trusses on a beam which splits the span and I will use a top chord bearing there as well. One truss will sit on to the other,.....kind of like a keyway. This gives me some adjustment (an inch or so) in case the walls are not truly parallel. I slide the truss so it is tight to the lvl and run a 4.5" simpson sds screw thru the floor truss into the ledger. The OJ 2000's are not a true floor truss. I believe they are a 3x2  vs a 4x2. Also I don't believe you can get custom end details similar to that on a floor truss.

I have spoken with several who have poured the tf system. They say there is absolutely no compression which is understandable because of the design. I always use external corner bracing no matter what form I use. The external bracing gives me a plumb corner to work off of. I just leave in place for the pour. 

If you have an inch of compression in  a 10' pour, you have some serious problems. I have seen up to a 1/2" in a 10'8" pour though. All depends on the footing, how well the blocks are interlocked, and how the concrete is poured.  I use panel jack bracing and I have seen the screw in the top block go from the top of the slot to the bottom, and then some after an 11' pour. I think the slots are a 1/2" or so. This doesn't happen all the time, but I do see it from time to time.  I poured a small job with quad lock a few years ago, but I never paid attention the how much vertical movement there was. I have a few quad lock block sitting in the shop. When I put them together they seem like they have a solid connection.

Bunt



Bunt
lkazanov2User is Offline
Basic Member
Basic Member
Send Private Message
Posts:177

--
21 Dec 2008 12:09 AM
Bunt,

Thank you...the idea of bearing a truss on top of the ledger vs hanging is certainly an option...definitely will save on the joist hangers. (And I have no doubt that this may be a more solid connection). I see that a 2x4 is used a rim (fits in a key) to support the subfloor between the joists. My concern is how does the finish wall look withe ledger below the floor system. It will project into the finish wall by the thickness of the ledger. How do you finish this off? I imagined that wall sheetrock will be flat from the floor system to the joists above.

With regards to the OJ 2000...they are a true floor truss. They are available in 2x4 and MSR 2x4 depending on the span. I have chosen this particular system because the wood members making up the truss are glued. They are not roll-press stapled with plates. From my understanding these rolled metal connection stamps may give with time and cause squeaks? Opinions?

Thanks again....

Leonard



lkazanov2User is Offline
Basic Member
Basic Member
Send Private Message
Posts:177

--
21 Dec 2008 12:12 AM
Bunt,

I am sorry..I finally understood what you said that the floor is hung by "top cord." This certainly covers the LVL if it is less wide then the depth of the truss. But again, what do you think of the glued "truss" vs the metal connected truss?

Leonard



BuntlyUser is Offline
Basic Member
Basic Member
Send Private Message
Posts:162

--
21 Dec 2008 09:26 AM
If you send me your email, I will send you some pics on Monday. I have been an independent engineer for a truss company for about 10 years now, and I have never had or heard of an issue where the metal connector plates squeak. In my region, floor trusses are basically the same $$/ft regardless of the depth. With that said I would go as deep as you can. The strength and stiffness is in the depth. The TCA recommends min of L/360 LL deflection and L/240 TL for tile. I always install floors that meet L/480 TL deflection using 65# loading. If there is stone or marble, I use L/720 TL deflection with 75 psf loading.  I also always install at 19.2" o.c unless there is some reason not to.

I actually had one instance where I installed a 14" deep floor truss system and had a squeak. There was a 3/4" subfloor, hardibacker, then ceramic tile. I finished the floor and noticed that there was one location where the floor squeaked. I thought about it for a few days, and tore out the tile and hardibacker in a 5'x5' area where I thought the squeak was. I thought possibley that the hardibacker may not have been screwed down enough. I replaced the hardibacker and the tile. After it dried I walked on it and it squeaked in the same damn place. I went in the basement and had someone walk on floor above. I noticed one of the screws I used to screw the hardibacker down protruded thu the subfloor about 3/16" and rubbed against the side of a truss plate. I took a dremel and ground of the head of the screw and the squeak was gone. This is the only instance I have ever heard of where the floor system squeaked, but obivously had nothing to do with the design or manufacturing of the floor truss.

I have been on many jobs as I'm sure others here have, where a new floor system is installed and there are squeaks right away. It seems like 9 times out of 10 the squeaks are when hangers are used and improperly installed. There are then the squeaks that develop after the house is dried in.
I see many people who glue the subloor and nail, then come back a few days later and screw the heck out of it. To me this is bad practice, the  floor needs to be screwed when the glue is still wet otherwise the subfloor is not tight to the joist and squeaks are inevitable, kinda like nail pops in drywall.

Bunt


Bunt
tdbuilderUser is Offline
New Member
New Member
Send Private Message
Posts:67

--
21 Dec 2008 05:07 PM
On one of the homes I built in early summer we put the floor in first, and your right it work great. First the floor shored up the top of the system with the plywood on, it was easy to work on but working off my knees to finish it off and run the vibrator down sucked. I used the Simpsons for speed reasons. If you use the anchor bolts you will have to go under the floor after and give the bolts a couple of light hits to ensure the bolts are in and that they are encased with the concrete. We used TF on this one and did not have to use any 2x4s to hold the floor up the system held it up its self. We screwed to the plastic I beams with 3" screws (the Simpson were just in to the foam) and it held great. This floor also had 1 1/2" of light weight concrete on it after the building was done. I will try to post a pic of it with the walls set up and poured if I have any. With it all said and done the the floor can not sink because when screwed to the I beams there is no place for it to go. As far as the external braces, when you are installing it they are not really a big deal. They go up fast and with the turnbuckles to the top you can adjust them if needed when the wall is completed of the scaffold/floor. With it all said and done we will still install other systems if the customer insist, but my crews are going to keep using TF for speed, less waste, versatility, easy assembly, and all around comfort with the system. Now if I could get them to give me a better brake on the price so I could have a bigger profit margin so I wouldn't have to bid so tight on labor.


BuntlyUser is Offline
Basic Member
Basic Member
Send Private Message
Posts:162

--
22 Dec 2008 09:21 AM
tdbuilder when you poured as mentioned above, I assume you had the ledger attached correct? If so, you mention that you poured without supporting the ledger and relied on the ties to support the joists and the plywood during the pour is that correct? If so, thats pretty impressive.

Bunt


Bunt
tdbuilderUser is Offline
New Member
New Member
Send Private Message
Posts:67

--
22 Dec 2008 11:53 AM
Yes, that is what we did. I dont know what the manufactor would say about it but worked and we had no problems.


lkazanov2User is Offline
Basic Member
Basic Member
Send Private Message
Posts:177

--
22 Dec 2008 12:38 PM
Posted By tdbuilder on 12/22/2008 11:53 AM
Yes, that is what we did. I dont know what the manufactor would say about it but worked and we had no problems.

That is really impressive how strong this ICF system is.  I would definitely still shore.  Perhaps not at 16" OC but still...I think that is very cheap security.

Leonard




GuyBUser is Offline
New Member
New Member
Send Private Message
Posts:52

--
23 Dec 2008 10:53 AM
Tdbuilder,

This seems like a great way of putting up walls. I have two questions:

Is there any need to adjust the wall when you construct using this method? It would seem that the 3" screws into the webs and the rigidity of the joists and subfloor would make any adjustment impossible.

What is the purpose of the turnbuckles on the corners if the floor is in place?

Thanks,
Guy



tdbuilderUser is Offline
New Member
New Member
Send Private Message
Posts:67

--
23 Dec 2008 11:38 AM
You can adjust up to the point, where you start to put the trusses on. After that it is real hard to move. It still can be moved on the walls that run parallel with the trusses. The turnbuckles on the corners are for the leveling of the walls before the floor is on. You can still fine tune them after, but they have to be close at the point of setting up the floor. If you are working on scaffold you can reach over the corner to adjust them if need be. If I need to slide a panel up for some reason (like I had dropped my makita impact driver in) I can slide the outside panel up (the inside was attached to the ledger already). I loosened the closest corner turnbuckle to take the pressure off and the panel slide up nicely, then pushed it back down and re leveled it. By the way the lumber has to be some what straight, I had a couple that were twisted prttey bad and after stuggling with them some got cut up for the short runs some got returned.


You are not authorized to post a reply.
Page 3 of 3 << < 123


Active Forums 4.1
Membership Membership: Latest New User Latest: croccohvacusa New Today New Today: 0 New Yesterday New Yesterday: 0 User Count Overall: 35027
People Online People Online: Visitors Visitors: 192 Members Members: 0 Total Total: 192
Copyright 2011 by BuildCentral, Inc.   Terms Of Use  Privacy Statement