Magnesium Oxide Board - is it better than OSB
Last Post 16 Oct 2012 04:41 PM by MgO Corp Pty Ltd. 407 Replies.
Printer Friendly
Sort:
PrevPrev NextNext
Topic is locked
Page 5 of 21 << < 34567 > >>
Author Messages
The SipperUser is Offline
Basic Member
Basic Member
Send Private Message
Posts:264

--
17 Mar 2009 12:12 PM
Believe me, CK, I was smiling when I sent that last post!


The Sipper
SIPGUYNCUser is Offline
New Member
New Member
Send Private Message
Posts:21

--
17 Mar 2009 11:30 PM

Please correct the information you are submitting.  Neither of these companies manufacture SIPS.  Just  did not want to embarrass you on the blog.  Be careful

 



J.Jeff Harvey<br>PanelwerxSIPS<br>[email protected]<br>888-607-0538
The SipperUser is Offline
Basic Member
Basic Member
Send Private Message
Posts:264

--
18 Mar 2009 05:00 PM
SIPGUYNC, If your "warning post" was directed at me, please advise me as to which information that you think  that I need to correct. I've made it very clear many times in previous posts that my firm is a distributor for a specific brand of SIPs (R-Control). I am unaware of any rule that requires one to be a "manufacturer" of SIPs in order to post comments, and engage in related "discussions" on this website.


The Sipper
SIPGUYNCUser is Offline
New Member
New Member
Send Private Message
Posts:21

--
18 Mar 2009 09:51 PM

Sipper,

The "warning" was to JUSAXME for supplying misinformation as the manufacturing of MgOSIPs by companies whom import MgO board.  It was a heads-up to do their homework first.  Sorry for the confusion.

SIPGUYNC



J.Jeff Harvey<br>PanelwerxSIPS<br>[email protected]<br>888-607-0538
jusaxemeUser is Offline
New Member
New Member
Send Private Message
Posts:38

--
19 Mar 2009 07:30 AM
http://www.magwall.com/index.php/system
Sure looks like they make and sell them to me.


PaulcfUser is Offline
New Member
New Member
Send Private Message
Posts:27

--
09 Apr 2009 09:37 PM
Mag boards on SIPs have several issues...firstly is size, at least from our competition they only offer 8 and 9' lengths. Weight is another concern and it is very hard on the assembly crew to move these heavy panels around. Some firms I know buy mag board from China. So I have to ask what is 'green' about that? And what about "China quality"...looking at yogurt in their market, paint, drywall, and heaven's knows what else? I have also heard about de-bonding issues but don't know where that rests at this time.

Back to China sourced mag products. It has to be shipped via a less than enviro friendly truck to some ocean port, maybe Shanghai? Then it crosses the ocean and arrives in port. It has to be handled yet again and shipped via truck or train? On and on. That seems to be missing the point of SIPs and in fact the embedded energy in those SIPs made with mag product/board has got to be a LOT higher than even stick building a home with locally created materials.

Next is magnesium itself. I have a feeling that it is not in our best health interests to be surrounded by it in a building envelope. And if you're terrified by formaldehyde, better throw out all your furniture, cabinets, etc as they're full of glues (laminates too). But the good news I hear is that off gassing is a short lived affair, ends when it 'cures' after manufacture...in other words it doesn't continue indefinitely. So a win for OSB.

Finally cost. OSB I am sure has got to be extremely cheap to manufacture and it is extremely prevalent. I assume there are some mag product builders in North America but at what cost are their products? If I need waterproof, I'll get other generally available products that have been tested and extensively used.

The point of SIPs is to create an energy efficient building envelope using resources that don't come from half way around the globe. I beat every mag board SIPs quote every time so I guess that means something too?


Matt B. Phelps, P.E., R.S.User is Offline
New Member
New Member
Send Private Message
Posts:48

--
10 Apr 2009 01:13 AM

You raise some very good points about MgO and OSB; however, I think it only appropriate to point out that Expanded Poly Styrene (EPS) began life as crude oil.  Most crude oil, like MgO from China is imported from foreign countries a world away from Muleshoe Texas (my home town)!  The point being that no matter what structural skin a SIP is made from if it has an EPS core, it, like the MgO example, has taken that long boat ride from somewhere.  Most of the examples I see regarding EPS tend to focus on how the use of crude oil that is used to make the poly styrene precursor to EPS has a exponential savings of energy (crude oil?) over the life of the structure the EPS is used in.  Should this logic be applied to MgO?  I do not know?  I do know that most people who contact me regarding MgO debonding and other issues seek to replace other building trades, such as gypsum, and are of the opinion that the net savings is sufficient to pay a premium for the MgO skins.  I must admit I have not done an energy balance on this concept, so I do not know how "green" it may, or may not be.

I must agree with you that formaldehydes do pose a potential health threat; however, the APA has published numerous white papers and investigative reports that have consistently provided data that formaldehyde off gassing concentrations are so low that they do not pose a significant health threat. 

On a funny side note, I am aware that magnesium is a macro nutrient and actually has a USDA recommended minimum daily allowance.  I am not suggesting that we should start chowing down on MgO, just that it has not been identified as a unhealthy product.  I am sure the USDA has no recommend daily allowance for formaldehyde.

I also seem to recall from basic chemistry that Mg exist only as a solid (or a solid suspended in a liquid).  I may be wrong, but I do not think Mg can exist as a gas at the temperatures and pressures common to the human environment. 

I also agree that if the project needs waterproofing, use 30 lb felt or some type of home wrap. 

Yes, OSB does cost less that MgO; however, most people hoping to use MgO are looking to replace interior drywall with the interior side of the SIP being MgO.  I am not sure how well that is working, I do not know any one that has actual done this, only talked about using MgO.  I do see how replacing one or more building trades with the properties MgO could result in a lower net cost.  Additionally, I understand that MgO posses a one hour fire rating that OSB typically does not.

If anyone has actual installed SIPs made from MgO please contact me off list.  My contact information is listed below.

Good luck,

Matt B. Phelps, P.E, R.S.

SIP Engineering and Testing, LLC
201 CR 138
Hutto, Texas 78634
[email protected]
512-870-9400 office



BrawlerUser is Offline
Basic Member
Basic Member
Send Private Message
Posts:229

--
10 Apr 2009 09:18 AM
Posted By tesla-was-right on 03/11/2009 6:55 PM

Mr. Kavala,

THis is not a dump on the steel sip guy but I do not agree with the generalization that they have no quality control.  Some do and some do not--just like in the US.  Most meet ISO international standards.  There are Korean and Us companies making in China.  (By the way, they make steel sips as well)

I have seen good ones and not as good ones.

One company is fully tested in the US and several others others either are or will soon be.

Anything is better than firewood and embalming fluids to build a house.

I would say to have samples sent and look at the testing certifications



Tesla was right and Teslastones both have great concern for houses built of firewood. Interesting choice of words. Also a MGO connection. Are yall the same person. If not the exactly who are you?


The SipperUser is Offline
Basic Member
Basic Member
Send Private Message
Posts:264

--
10 Apr 2009 03:08 PM
He/they also refer to EPS as "Nalpalm", Brawler, these two posters are obviously the same individual, and now it appears that he may be posting under still another user name, that is "jusaxeme". At least, "jusaxme" didn't say "no" when I asked that question in a post on The "residential" forum where you, I, and others, are questioning the agenda(s) of this, or these,
poster(s).

These forums could really be turned into a circus if the use of multiple user names became a widespread practice. It doesn't take much imagination to see how things might evolve.

I don't think that any of the regular participants on these forums would question anyone's right to criticize products that they don't believe in, and to promote products and concepts that they feel offer better solutions. However, I think that most of us resent those who consistently use scare tactics, personal insults, and manipulation of data from reports and studies, to further their agenda. Actually, as has been observed by myself and others, the excerpts from such reports, studies, etc., that have been posted in this regard, never really make the intended point anyway.

Having said all of that, I would suggest that anyone who thinks that they have a better solution to the subject at hand, start promoting his agenda, on the GBT Residential Forum, be it building products/systems, consulting services, books, or??, (hopefully under one user name) That way we can all learn about them. Maybe some, or all, of us will decide to "change horses" when we are exposed to "the light".

In the meantime, I'm going to "keep on Sippin" (I'm not sure that sounds right, but I'm sure that everyone get's my drift.)





The Sipper
DonnerwetterUser is Offline
Basic Member
Basic Member
Send Private Message
Posts:100

--
10 Apr 2009 04:09 PM
Sipper...What are you sippin on? TF systems??? :)


The SipperUser is Offline
Basic Member
Basic Member
Send Private Message
Posts:264

--
10 Apr 2009 05:26 PM
DW........Nope, I'm "sippin" on this forum and "TF iing" on the ICF forum. Actually, we're looking at some projects where we may be "sippin and TF ing" at the same time, mostly in NorCal but have some things going on down South too. We're easy to find on the GBT directory.


The Sipper
want to buildUser is Offline
New Member
New Member
Send Private Message
Posts:92

--
14 Apr 2009 02:49 PM
I have not read all the posts on this thread, but I found these that I'm interested in:

http://www.mag-wall.com/


LiviuUser is Offline
New Member
New Member
Send Private Message
Posts:36

--
19 Apr 2009 04:29 PM
Yes it much better. I just came from China where I was visiting a few factories for MgO. We are going to have this product here in short time in two thicknesses, 1/4 and 1/2 inc. The reason why the product is mainly made in China is because the raw material is there in high quantities, also the price . After visiting those factories I am sure that this product will never  be made in USA due to the DEQ regulations here. This product is also used for fireproof doors, ventilation and A/C ducting/ tubing, it can be laminate, it can be used for furnitures, it can be used for floors, ceiling, walls , outside, inside, it can be cut, nailed , screwed, etc.. I am just amazed about this product. I do believe that it will replace everything that is used now strting from the OSB and finishing with the drywall. We are going to import thicker MgO , tongue and groove for floors also.


siphomesnwUser is Offline
New Member
New Member
Send Private Message
Posts:1

--
11 May 2009 02:39 PM
We are using MgO on the inside our SIP homes, and it is a great product. We are ICC tested and it is excellent for sheetrock alternative, hardiback altnerative, or whatever need you have. It saves quite a bit of time in the building process simply because there is less labor involved when you don't need to hang sheetrock, and there are more than 1/2 the seams to tape and mudd. We are using it more and more and people love it.


Sip Supply IncUser is Offline
New Member
New Member
Send Private Message
Posts:44

--
11 May 2009 02:56 PM
Posted By The Sipper on 03/16/2009 8:47 PM
That's OK, CK, I'll just wait until you get your website up.
you can view power point and details at



http://www.storyq.net/boxes/7417


[email protected]
MagDaddyUser is Offline
New Member
New Member
Send Private Message
Posts:60

--
12 May 2009 12:35 PM
Posted By siphomesnw on 05/11/2009 2:39 PM
We are using MgO on the inside our SIP homes, and it is a great product. We are ICC tested and it is excellent for sheetrock alternative, hardiback altnerative, or whatever need you have. It saves quite a bit of time in the building process simply because there is less labor involved when you don't need to hang sheetrock, and there are more than 1/2 the seams to tape and mudd. We are using it more and more and people love it.


If you dont mind me asking what company are you with ?


Matt B. Phelps, P.E., R.S.User is Offline
New Member
New Member
Send Private Message
Posts:48

--
12 May 2009 06:29 PM
I am very interested in your post. I quick check of the ICC-ES web site and search for magnesium oxide and MgO only returns one product that has an ICC-ES report, it is for a product called Dragonboard and the ICC is for basement use only. The ICC-ES report number is ESR-2716 for the Dragonboard product and is a basement finishing system only. The report holder is TEMO, INC from Michigan.

I have tested a few MgO skins in our structural testing lab and have found them to be fraught with problems in SIP construction. I would like to request a copy of your engineers report. Please respond to my contact information listed below.

Best of luck to you,


Matt B. Phelps, P.E.
SIP Engineering & Testing, LLC
201 CR 138
Hutto, Texas 78634
512/670-9400 (o)
[email protected]


cmkavalaUser is Offline
Veteran Member
Veteran Member
Send Private Message
Posts:4324
Avatar

--
13 May 2009 04:45 AM
To those who don't know TEMO is an all seasons type sunroom company, who uses SIPs walls and roofs usually very small spans


Chris Kavala<br>[email protected]<br>1-877-321-SIPS<br />
Matt B. Phelps, P.E., R.S.User is Offline
New Member
New Member
Send Private Message
Posts:48

--
13 May 2009 07:52 AM
Just to clarify, the Temo ICC ESR is NOT for SIPS. It is for basement applications only and is an alternative to drywall.

Matt


WayneZhangUser is Offline
New Member
New Member
Send Private Message
Posts:12

--
17 Jul 2009 08:34 PM
I read the discussion of the mgo board with patient. I am relatively new to mgo board.
 
The major confusion is mgo board and fibre reinforced mgo board.
 
mgo base construction in China started with firebricks/bricks for furnaces in early 19 centry and it has been the dominate material since.
The bricks are burned in a way to make it very strong and block the heat from furnace.
 
With the development of the technology, some of the mgo bricks are made to be thin and about 1/2" thick and gradually leaded into the mgo board.
 
As mgo boards, at size about 4'x8', with massive production, without the traditional "baking" process, or too expensive to do so, are relataively strong and non-combustible per ASTM E 136, but have two major weakness, they are too brittle and doesn't resistant to water. 

As stated by David Mills, when they get wet the Magnesium Chloride can leach out of them which degrades the integrity of the cement.  Not to mention that magnesium chloride salts are very corrosive to metal that comes in contact with the salt. In AC 386, the last para, 5.4 it shall not be used in wet areas described in IBC Section 2502 and shall not be used in showers.

Back to mgo board, to increase the strength of traditional mgo boards, fiber reinforced mgo based sheet were developed.  And we finally have an  AC 386. But AC 386 did not specify what kind of fiber shall be used. And AC 386, failed to set up a industrial stardard other than set up the criteria based on one big company who has a deep pocket, similar to the way as AC 376. (Maybe because AC is not an industry association, but it should set up a AC creteria based on an industry standard not a single product from a company. The industry needs to set a standard for fiber reinforced mgo board.

If any organic fiber, wood, cellulose fibre(pulp) are added to make them structural applicable, ( that is to replace plywood, OSB), the amount of organic fibre added is going to make the penal strong but it will fail ASTM E 136. A number of tests conducted on samples of fibre reinforced mgo board failed ASTM E 136 while still claimed to be non-combustible. Lots fibre reinforce mgo board contains about 20% wood or celluse or fibreglass. This is why we read conflicts of properties of mgo boards.

Most of the mgo board manufactories in China are now fiber cement boards (use celluse fibres) manufacturers as well as they adapted to relatively new product similar to hardie panels.

But neither mgo boards nor fiber cement boards are intended for structural applications-more for sidding or partitioning.

Only CEMENT BONDED PARTICLE BOARD, the last member of the particle board familty, widely used in Europe in the past 80 years, are structural boards to replace OSB and plywood, which is also inflammable, moisture resistant, termite and molds resistant. In UK, CBPB is widely used for almost all buildings.



Topic is locked
Page 5 of 21 << < 34567 > >>


Active Forums 4.1
Membership Membership: Latest New User Latest: dliese New Today New Today: 0 New Yesterday New Yesterday: 1 User Count Overall: 34724
People Online People Online: Visitors Visitors: 89 Members Members: 0 Total Total: 89
Copyright 2011 by BuildCentral, Inc.   Terms Of Use  Privacy Statement