Faulty Earthlinked DX systems
Last Post 07 Jul 2011 10:29 AM by drao. 212 Replies.
Printer Friendly
Sort:
PrevPrev NextNext
You are not authorized to post a reply.
Page 9 of 11 << < 7891011 > >>
Author Messages
JackHUser is Offline
New Member
New Member
Send Private Message
Posts:37

--
07 Oct 2009 06:49 PM
This is the one that we always thought had a ductwork issue.

High limit as "engineer" pointed out, can lead to short cycling like that, ...AKA, duct work to small, dirty filter, wrong air volume.

Also what kind of thermostats do you have?

Maybe Brian should put a regular PSC motor back in that one, to test against the ECM, just a thought. or keep the front door off the furnace to see what happens to short cycle.

This all goes back to," bad duct work can kill a heat pump",but it can also " kill a furnace"!


geo fanUser is Offline
Basic Member
Basic Member
Send Private Message
Posts:408

--
07 Oct 2009 07:02 PM
Ill jump in here , If the burners are on for LESS then 1 min my first thought would be stat . only because for a high limit to trip in that short amount of time the fan would have to be locked up . but the question is . Does it shut off while the stat is calling . or is the system short cycling because thats what its being told to do .


engineerUser is Offline
Veteran Member
Veteran Member
Send Private Message
Posts:2749

--
07 Oct 2009 08:08 PM
That could well be the case. I have nearly zero experience with gas home furnaces. (Gas units I deal with make 30,000 lb / hr or more steam - controls are a BIT different...)

Adding support to Geo Fan's stat theory is the short cycling of the 4 ton geo unit a page or so back in similar weather - cycles of 3-5 minutes by a geo unit could easily equate to 1 minute cycles by gas heat.

Perhaps the stat is a bit too sensitive or is improperly located near a supply


Curt Kinder <br><br>

The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is - Winston Churchill <br><br><a href="http://www.greenersolutionsair.com">www.greenersolutionsair.com</a>
joe.amiUser is Offline
Veteran Member
Veteran Member
Send Private Message
Posts:4377
Avatar

--
07 Oct 2009 11:07 PM
Posted By geo fan on 10/07/2009 7:02 PM
Ill jump in here , If the burners are on for LESS then 1 min my first thought would be stat . only because for a high limit to trip in that short amount of time the fan would have to be locked up . but the question is . Does it shut off while the stat is calling . or is the system short cycling because thats what its being told to do .

Welcome back GF, missed ya!
If the duct work were causing the short cycle folks, wouldn't it have done it pre-geo?
j


Joe Hardin
www.amicontracting.com
We Dig Comfort!
www.doityourselfgeothermal.com
Dig Your Own Comfort!
draoUser is Offline
New Member
New Member
Send Private Message
Posts:63

--
08 Oct 2009 08:27 AM
Thank you for the input.  My guess is also that it is a thermostat issue.  Brian replaced all my previous thermostats with some state of the art Honeywell ones.  I have to find out the model.  This did not happen with my gas furnace previously.     Hence it cannot be a duct problem. My electricity use with no 4Ton unit on is also higher than normal probably because of the airhandlers coming on frequently. He is coming today to check it out.

Here are the reads.




10/04/09

00139        06

2132            24

 4898          05

4155              64

           High   57F

10/05/09

00143        04

2159            27

 4900          02

4226               71

           High   57F

10/06/09

 

At 3PM , 4 Ton

Switched off and system set to Emergency Gas Mode

00149        06

2184            25

 4904          04

4296              70

           High   61F

10/07/09

 00155        06

2184            00

 4905           01

4339               43

           High   57F



JackHUser is Offline
New Member
New Member
Send Private Message
Posts:37

--
08 Oct 2009 08:36 AM
That is why I questioned the thermostat. If there is a cycle rate per hour or a heat pump/gas heat switch on the back, in the wrong position.

Or it could be as simple as, debris in the drain line, causing a backup of condensate from the furnace to shut the flame off. but if the furnace is completely shuting off after flame goes out, its probably not.


draoUser is Offline
New Member
New Member
Send Private Message
Posts:63

--
08 Oct 2009 08:43 AM
Thanks for the quick response.  I will have Brian look into these pointers when he gets here .


MasoudUser is Offline
Basic Member
Basic Member
Send Private Message
Posts:180

--
08 Oct 2009 10:10 AM
"This did not happen with my gas furnace previously. Hence it cannot be a duct problem." The ducts are the same, but there are new ECM motors pushing air through them.

Regards,

Masoud


draoUser is Offline
New Member
New Member
Send Private Message
Posts:63

--
08 Oct 2009 03:35 PM
I am told that the Honeywell thermostats are Model : TH6320R1004 with wireless capability.  To Mr. Masoud, I am not sure I understand the drift of the new ECM motors causing short cycling.  Please elaborate.  Thanks.  Brian was here this morning and checked things out.  He thinks it may be something to do with the cycling rate of the basement thermostat.  He will get in touch with their tech dept. and will have an update when he comes next week with the meters and temp sensors to monitor system run times .


MasoudUser is Offline
Basic Member
Basic Member
Send Private Message
Posts:180

--
08 Oct 2009 05:15 PM
My point was that air handlers and ducts are two major components of the air distribution system and work together. Changing one, could have changed the equation, resulting in wrong air volume that was brought up by JackH at the top of this page.

Regards,

Masoud


draoUser is Offline
New Member
New Member
Send Private Message
Posts:63

--
15 Oct 2009 10:17 AM

Here are the past week's meter reads.  Brian will be here tomorrow with the run time meters and temp sensors .  He also has a call into Honeywell for adjusting thermostat sensitivity.  My 4 Ton unit is still off and system is on emergency gas mode.

 

 

                                           2Ton                          4 Ton                            5Ton                                 Main

10/08/09

 00162        07

2184            00

 4911           06

4384               45

           High  61F

10/09/09

 00168        06

2184            00

 4911           00

4425               41

            High  52F

10/10/09

 00176        08

2184            00

 4920           09

4475               50

            High  52F

10/11/09

 00186        10

2184            00

 4932           12

4535               60

            High 43F

10/12/09

 00199        13

2184            00

 4944           12

4598               63

            High  50F

10/13/09

 00208        09

2184            00

 4952           08

4649               51

            High  49F

10/14/09

 00221        13

2184           00

 4968           16

4718                69

           High   46F


Please let me know if the 2Ton and 5Ton systems are operating as they should with the current temps.  Thanks again!



Bill NeukranzUser is Offline
Veteran Member
Veteran Member
Send Private Message
Posts:1103

--
15 Oct 2009 12:11 PM

There may be a faster way to determining if your system(s) are indeed not performing.

My recommendation is to ask your HVAC professional that's coming tomorrow to include in his measurements whatever's necessary to:

1. compute COP

2. enable look up of manufacturer's COP spec (it will vary as a function of various parameters that may need to be additionally measured).

Then, ask him to do the COP computation, look up what the spec is for the conditions of measurement, and simply tell you if the computed COP is at or below manufacturer spec.  And do this for each unit.

This is a straight forward exercise with a water-to-air GSHP.  What I don't know is how difficult this is with refrigerant-to-air (DX) technology systems.

If COP can be measured here, then it's going to give you a 'figure of merit' for the complete system - the refrigerant piping, the compressor pumping, and GSHP unit itself, that can be compared to 'good' versus 'not good.'

The reason I offer these comments is because, 9 or so pages into this thread, after a lot of expense on the part of the HVAC installer, and after a lot of aggravation / cost to the owner, still, it's very uncertain if it's the equipment or the house (including the duct system).

Hence, the suggestion here is thought to assist with at least getting quickly to the decision point of 'it's the house' or 'it's the equipment.'

Good luck.

Best regards,

Bill



Energy reduction & monitoring</br>
American Energy Efficiencies, Inc - Dallas, TX <A
href="http://www.americaneei.com">
(www.americaneei.com)</A></br>
Example monitoring system: <A href="http://www.welserver.com/WEL0043"> www.welserver.com/WEL0043</A>
Palace GeothermalUser is Offline
Veteran Member
Veteran Member
Send Private Message
Posts:1609

--
17 Oct 2009 09:41 AM
Thanks Curt,   I am anxious to try these out.


Dewayne Dean

<br>www.PalaceGeothermal.com<br>Why settle for 90% when you can have 400%<br>We heat and cool with dirt!<br>visit- http://welserver.com/WEL0114/- to see my system
draoUser is Offline
New Member
New Member
Send Private Message
Posts:63

--
10 Nov 2009 11:29 AM

Hi everyone,

                         I haven't been updating recently since there was not much to update.  Brian had to order the meters from another state and they took their time.  He is in the process of putting them in.  Hopefully, he will get it done today.  I briefly turned on the 4Ton unit(on 10/17/09 and 10/18/09) and the energy drain happened immediately.  I turned it off as in the table after talking to Brian. Both my basement and upstairs zones are on gas heat presently.  I just got my Oct 09 bill and I noted this from the bill.

Last year at the same time, I had complete geothermal heat.   Here's some data , temperature maintained 72F

Last year gas usage/day (cooking and hot water only)  : 0.248MCF

This year gas usage/day(cooking, hot water and heating basement and upstairs-4t unit area):  0.397MCF

In other words, the gas consumption for heating the area of the 4Ton unit(upstairs and basement)/day is : 0.397-0.248=0.149MCF

For 30 daysi.e. a month it is 0.1249*30= 4.47MCF=$45.14 in heating costs.($10.098/MCF)


From the statistics provided to me by Brian, this unit, in October was supposed to consume 332.6kwh translating to about $30 in heating costs.

If you observe the fact that the 4Ton unit consumed 37kwh in just one day with moderate temps, that would amount to 1110 kwh for 30 days or $100!(conservative estimate!).  Even the 5Ton unit uses less!!

So, people is it wrong for me to assert that this unit is a piece of JUNK!  
The only hole I see is the MONEY PIT!


Please offer me your well meaning comments.

Thanks!

drao

                                              2T                              4T                                 5T                                   Main

10/15/09

 00235        14

2184           00

 4989           21

4789                 71

            High  45F

 

10/16/09

 No reads taken

 No reads taken

No reads taken

No reads taken

           High   46F

10/17/09

4 Ton started back at noon with modified

Cycle times on stats

 

 

 00262         00

2190            06

 

System worked

Only 6 hrs before reading

 5021           32

4936            147

            High  47F           

10/18/09

 

Turned off 4 Ton at 8PM after talking to Brian

 00275         13

 2227           37

 5045           24

5050              114

           High   50F

10/19/09

 00287          12

 2230           03

 5048           03

5100                 50

            High  60F

10/20/09

 00292          06

 2230           00

 5048          00

5136                 36

            High  62F

10/21/09

Brian turned on   4 Ton unit to check performance for 30 mins

 00294         02

2231           01

 5048           00

5166                30

            High  67F

         

10/22/09

 00297        03

2231           00

 5048           00

5195                 29

           High  59F          

10/23/09

 00309        12

2231           00

 5053           05

5251                 56

            High  60F

10/24/09

 

 00316        07

2231           00

 5054           01

5288                37

           High   54F

10/25/09

 00325       09

2231           00

 5062           08

5343                55

           High   58F      

 

10/26/09

00333         08

2231           00

5062           00

5380                37

          High    61F

10/27/09

00338         05

2231           00 

5062            00

 5413               33

      High        55F

10/28/09

00344         06

2231           00

5062           00

 5447               34

       High      54F

10/29/09

00350         06

2231           00

5062          00

 5489               42

        High     55F

10/30/09

00357         07

 2231          00

5064         02

 5526              37

 

         High   70F

10/31/09

00361        04

  2231        00

5064           00

  5560            34

         High    61F

11/01/09

00370        09

  2231        00

5072           08

  5610            50

          High   48F

11/02/09

00383        13

  2231        00

5080           08

  5664            54

           High  49F

11/03/09

00395        12

  2231        00

5089           09

  5718            54

           High  47F

11/04/09

 

00409        14

  2231        00

5101           12

  5779            61

          High   45F

11/05/09

00421        12

  2231        00

5112            11

  5834             55

            High  47F

11/06/09

00437        16

  2231       00

5125            13

  5899             65

            High  48F

11/07/09

  No Reads     

  No Reads

No Reads

  No Reads         

             High 66F

11/08/09

00452         15

  2231        00

5132            07

  5984             85

            High  69F

11/09/09

00454         02

  2231       00

5132            00

  6014             30
             High 65F



draoUser is Offline
New Member
New Member
Send Private Message
Posts:63

--
11 Nov 2009 12:41 PM
Just an update.  The meters have been installed by Brian today and I am going to switch  to complete geothermal this evening after reads are taken- for a 24 hr period so run times may be obtained. Brian turned on the 4Ton unit temporarily to check meters installed correctly.   Tomorrow at the same time, I will switch 4Ton unit off and go back to gas heat so as to stem the energy hemorrhage. I will post data when I have it.


draoUser is Offline
New Member
New Member
Send Private Message
Posts:63

--
25 Nov 2009 11:36 AM
Just an update.  I have sent run time info with 4TON EARTHLINKED DX UNIT for 24 hrs and then switched the same to NATURAL GAS MODE FOR THE SAME AMOUNT OF TIME to Brian.  He is currently in the process of crunching numbers and will get back to me with the result which I will post promptly.  Please check for updates.  " THE TRUTH OF THE PUDDING(PUMPKIN PIE) IS IN THE EATING OF IT.  ALSO, THE GOOSE (TURKEY) IS FINALLY COOKED! HAPPY THANKSGIVING!


soxsterUser is Offline
New Member
New Member
Send Private Message
Posts:19

--
14 Dec 2009 11:40 AM
Did this finally get resolved?? I am looking at a Earthlinked DX system in southern Missouri (5 ton), and hearing cases like this, obviously gives me pause/hesitation, before jumping onto the geothermal bandwagon. I hope Earthlink reps are paying attention for future sales potential. I do not want to buy into a system that is not consumer responsive to problems with their equipment. thanks


southlineUser is Offline
New Member
New Member
Send Private Message
Posts:20

--
16 Dec 2009 10:09 PM
Well.....? What happend next?


soxsterUser is Offline
New Member
New Member
Send Private Message
Posts:19

--
20 Dec 2009 06:03 PM
I guess this got resolved I see no further gripping here.


Palace GeothermalUser is Offline
Veteran Member
Veteran Member
Send Private Message
Posts:1609

--
20 Dec 2009 08:31 PM
Posted By soxster on 12/20/2009 6:03 PM
I guess this got resolved I see no further gripping here.

Sounds like a leap of faith to me.


Dewayne Dean

<br>www.PalaceGeothermal.com<br>Why settle for 90% when you can have 400%<br>We heat and cool with dirt!<br>visit- http://welserver.com/WEL0114/- to see my system
You are not authorized to post a reply.
Page 9 of 11 << < 7891011 > >>


Active Forums 4.1
Membership Membership: Latest New User Latest: IntegratedHomes New Today New Today: 0 New Yesterday New Yesterday: 0 User Count Overall: 35026
People Online People Online: Visitors Visitors: 193 Members Members: 0 Total Total: 193
Copyright 2011 by BuildCentral, Inc.   Terms Of Use  Privacy Statement